Abstract
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) allows individuals to obtain genetic tests directly from companies without necessarily involving health professionals. This study explores genetic health professionals' opinions of health-related DTC-GT and the reported frequency of individuals presenting to clinical genetics services after undertaking testing. Genetic counsellors and clinical geneticists, members of the Human Genetics Society of Australasia, completed an online survey in mid 2011. The 130 genetic counsellors (estimated response fraction=43%) and 38 clinical geneticists (estimated response fraction=46%) had mixed opinions regarding DTC-GT, with only 7% confident in accurately interpreting and explaining DTC-GT results. Nineteen respondents (11%) reported one or more client(s) referred to them after undertaking DTC-GT. Descriptions of 25 clients were extracted from responses, and respondents reported that all clients were concerned for the health of either themselves or family members. Most clients presented to genetic clinics specifically as a result of their DTC-GT (96%) and were self or GP referred (92%). Respondents perceived that their clients typically undertook DTC-GT because they wanted to identify monogenic conditions, including carrier testing and/or know their susceptibility or predisposition for complex conditions (88%). The majority of clients needed help interpreting DTC-GT results (80%), however in general were not questioning the validity of their DTC-GT results (92%) nor seeking further genetic testing (84%). Currently, DTC-GT is not a major reason for referral to clinical genetics services in Australia and New Zealand and the majority of genetic health professionals lack confidence in being able to accurately interpret and explain DTC-GT results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Geransar R, Einsiedel E : Evaluating online direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests: Informed choices or buyers beware? Genet Test 2008; 12: 13–23.
Field A, Krokosky A, Terry SF : Direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests: Access does not reflect clinical utility. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2010; 14: 731–732.
Janssens AC, van Duijn C : An epidemiological perspective on the future of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Invest Genet 2010; 1: 10.
Bloss CS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ : Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Genomewide Profiling to Assess Disease Risk. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 524–534.
Borry P, Howard H, Sénécal K, Avard D : Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a review of companies' policies with regard to genetic testing in minors. Familial Cancer 2010; 9: 51–59.
Howard HC, Avard D, Borry P : Are the kids really all right? Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in children: are company policies clashing with professional norms? Eur J Hum Genet 2011; 19: 1122–1126.
Lee SS-J, Crawley L : Research 2.0: Social Networking and Direct-To-Consumer (DTC) Genomics. Am J Bioeth 2009; 9: 35–44.
Resnik DB : Direct-to-consumer genomics, social networking, and confidentiality. Am J Bioeth 2009; 9: 45–46.
Wasson K : Direct-to-consumer genomics and research ethics: Should a more robust informed consent process be included? Am J Bioeth 2009; 9: 56–58.
Ashley EA, Butte AJ, Wheeler MT et al: Clinical assessment incorporating a personal genome. Lancet 2010; 375: 1525–1535.
Roberts M, Riegert-Johnson D, Thomas B : Self diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome using direct to consumer genetic testing: A case study. J Genet Couns 2011; 20: 327–329.
Saunders K, Nazareth S, Pressman P : BRCA in the Ashkenazi population: Are current testing guidelines too exclusive? Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2011; 9: 3.
Imai K, Kricka LJ, Fortina P : Concordance study of 3 direct-to-consumer genetic-testing services. Clin Chem 2011; 57: 518–521.
Kutz G : Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Misleading Test Results are Further Complicated by Deceptive Marketing and Other Questionable Practices. United States Government Accountability Office, 2010
Richards M : Reading the runes of my genome: a personal exploration of retail genetics. New Genet Soc 2010; 29: 291–310.
Gollust SE, Gordon ES, Zayac C et al: Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: Perspectives from research participants. Public health genomics 2011; 15: 22–30.
Graves KD, Peshkin BN, Luta G, Tuong W, Schwartz MD : Interest in genetic testing for modest changes in breast cancer risk: Implications for SNP testing. Public Health Genomics 2011; 14: 178–189.
McGuire AL, Diaz CM, Wang T, Hilsenbeck SG : Social Networkers' Attitudes Toward Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing. Am J Bioeth 2009; 9: 3–10.
Wilde A, Meiser B, Mitchell PB, Schofield PR : Public interest in predictive genetic testing, including direct-to-consumer testing, for susceptibility to major depression: preliminary findings. Eur J Hum Genet 2010; 18: 47–51.
Giovanni MA, Fickie MR, Lehmann LS et al: Health-care referrals from direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2010; 14: 817–819.
Hock KT, Christensen KD, Yashar BM, Roberts JS, Gollust SE, Uhlmann WR : Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefs. Genet Med 2011; 13: 325–332.
Ohata T, Tsuchiya A, Watanabe M, Sumida T, Takada F : Physicians' opinion for ‘new’ genetic testing in Japan. J Hum Genet 2009; 54: 203–208.
Kolor K, Liu T, St Pierre J, Khoury MJ : Health care provider and consumer awareness, perceptions, and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests, United States, 2008. Genet Med 2009; 11: 595.
Powell K, Cogswell W, Christianson C et al: Primary care physicians' awareness, experience and opinions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. J Genet Counseling 2011; 1–14.
Bloss CS, Ornowski L, Silver E et al: Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments. Genet Med 2010; 12: 556–566.
Wright CF, Gregory-Jones S : Size of the direct-to-consumer genomic testing market. Genet Med 2010; 12: 594.
Roukos DH : Innovation versus evidence: to trust direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests? Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2011; 11: 1–4.
Murray ABV, Carson MJ, Morris CA, Beckwith J : Illusions of scientific legitimacy: misrepresented science in the direct-to-consumer genetic-testing marketplace. Trends Genet 2010; 26: 459–461.
Acknowledgements
This study was completed in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Master of Genetic Counselling, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and was supported by the Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program. JH is funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council Senior Research Fellowship (436904). We would like to thank the HGSA and ASGC for facilitating recruitment and the genetic health professionals who kindly completed the survey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on European Journal of Human Genetics website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brett, G., Metcalfe, S., Amor, D. et al. An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice. Eur J Hum Genet 20, 825–830 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.13
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.13
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review of healthcare professionals’ knowledge and views, and ethical and legal concerns
European Journal of Human Genetics (2022)
-
Public reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic health tests: A comparison across the US, UK, Japan and Australia
European Journal of Human Genetics (2020)
-
Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study
European Journal of Human Genetics (2018)
-
Improving family communication after a new genetic diagnosis: a randomised controlled trial of a genetic counselling intervention
BMC Medical Genetics (2014)
-
Survey of European clinical geneticists on awareness, experiences and attitudes towards direct-to-consumer genetic testing
Genome Medicine (2013)
