Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
The efficiency of the North Carolina expt. III and the selfing, backcrossing series for estimating additive and dominance variation
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 August 1980

The efficiency of the North Carolina expt. III and the selfing, backcrossing series for estimating additive and dominance variation

  • M J Kearsey1 

Heredity volume 45, pages 73–82 (1980)Cite this article

  • 1080 Accesses

  • 10 Citations

  • Metrics details

Summary

The optimum family structure of two experimental designs ((i) Non segregating generations plus F2's and backcrosses; (ii) The North Carolina Expt. III) have been investigated with respect to the estimation of additive (D) and non additive (H) genetic variation for a quantitative trait. In the former design it is shown that the generations should ideally be replicated in proportion to the total variation of each generation (if this is known) while in the latter, one should aim to sample at least 20 F2 plants. The relative efficiencies of the two designs are compared and the considerable advantages of the N.C. Expt. III design are illustrated and emphasised.

Similar content being viewed by others

A design optimized prime editor with expanded scope and capability in plants

Article 23 December 2021

A look-ahead Monte Carlo simulation method for improving parental selection in trait introgression

Article Open access 16 February 2021

Stresses affect inbreeding depression in complex ways: disentangling stress-specific genetic effects from effects of initial size in plants

Article Open access 29 June 2021

Article PDF

References

  • Comstock, R E, and Robinson, H F. 1952. Estimation of average dominance of genes. Heterosis, Chap. 30. Iowa State College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J L, and Perkins, J M. 1969. The detection of linked epistatic genes for a metrical trait. Heredity, 24, 465–575.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J L, and Perkins, J M. 1972. Predicting the range of inbred lines. Heredity, 28, 399–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kearsey, M J. 1970. Experimental sizes for detecting dominance variation. Heredity, 25, 529–542.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kearsey, M J, and Jinks, J L. 1968. A general method of detecting additive dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. 1. Theory. Heredity, 23, 403–409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K M, and Jinks, J L. 1971. Biometrical Genetics. Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pooni, H S, and Jinks, J L. 1976. The efficiency and optimal size of triple test cross designs for detecting epistatic variation. Heredity, 36, 215–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, England

    M J Kearsey

Authors
  1. M J Kearsey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kearsey, M. The efficiency of the North Carolina expt. III and the selfing, backcrossing series for estimating additive and dominance variation. Heredity 45, 73–82 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1980.51

Download citation

  • Received: 12 February 1980

  • Issue date: 01 August 1980

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1980.51

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Genetics underlying inbreeding depression in Mimulus with contrasting mating systems

    • Michele R. Dudash
    • David E. Carr

    Nature (1998)

  • Statistical power of the North Carolina Experiment III design in determining the likelihood of success of pedigree breeding programs in selfing plants

    • Eric M Hallerman
    • Jacques S Beckmann
    • Morris Soller

    Heredity (1987)

  • Predicting the frequencies of transgressive segregants for yield and yield components in wheat

    • J. W. Snape

    Theoretical and Applied Genetics (1982)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited