Abstract
To link microbial community 16S structure to a measured function in a natural soil, we have scaled both DNA and β-glucosidase assays down to a volume of soil that may approach a unique microbial community. β-Glucosidase activity was assayed in 450 individual aggregates, which were then sorted into classes of high or low activities, from which groups of 10 or 11 aggregates were identified and grouped for DNA extraction and pyrosequencing. Tandem assays of ATP were conducted for each aggregate in order to normalize these small groups of aggregates for biomass size. In spite of there being no significant differences in the richness or diversity of the microbial communities associated with high β-glucosidase activities compared with the communities associated with low β-glucosidase communities, several analyses of variance clearly show that the communities of these two groups differ. The separation of these groups is partially driven by the differential abundances of members of the Chitinophagaceae family. It may be observed that functional differences in otherwise similar soil aggregates can be largely attributed to differences in resource availability, rather than to the presence or absence of particular taxonomic groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Anderson MJ . (2006). Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62: 245–253.
Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL et al (2011). Navigating the multiple meanings of beta diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14: 19–28.
Bailey VL, Bilskis CL, Fansler SJ, McCue LA, Smith JL, Konopka A . (2012). Measurements of microbial community activities in individual soil macroaggregates. Soil Biol Biochem 48: 192–195.
Bailey VL, Fansler SJ, Bandyopadhyay S, Smith JL, Waters KM, Bolton H . (2010). Direct detection of soil mRNAs using targeted microarrays for genes associated with lignin degradation. Soil Biol Biochem 42: 1793–1799.
Bailey VL, McCue LA, Fansler SJ, Boyanov MI, DeCarlo F, Kemner KM et al (2013). Micrometer-scale physical structure and microbial composition of soil aggregates. Soil Biol Biochem; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.02.005.
Bailey VL, Smith JL, Bolton H Jr . (2002). Fungal-to-bacterial ratios in soils investigated for enhanced carbon sequestration. Soil Biol Biochem 34: 997–1007.
Berga M, Szekely AJ, Langenheder S . (2012). Effects of disturbance intensity and frequency on bacterial community composition and function. PLoS One 7: e36959.
Cai P, Huang QY, Zhang XW . (2006). Interactions of DNA with clay minerals and soil colloidal particles and protection against degradation by DNase. Environ Sci Technol 40: 2971–2976.
Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ et al (2009). The ribosomal database project: Improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D141–D145.
Crawford JW, Deacon L, Grinev D, Harris JA, Ritz K, Singh BK et al (2012). Microbial diversity affects self-organization of the soil-microbe system with consequences for function. J R Soc Interface 9: 1302–1310.
Dandurand LM, Schotzko DJ, Knudsen GR . (1997). Spatial patterns of rhizoplane populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Appl Environ Microb 63: 3211–3217.
Dokic L, Savic M, Narancic T, Vasiljevic B . (2010). Metagenomic analysis of soil microbial communities. Arch Biol Sci 62: 559–564.
Ellingsoe P, Johnsen K . (2002). Influence of soil sample sizes on the assessment of bacterial community structure. Soil Biol Biochem 34: 1701–1707.
Gans J, Wolinsky M, Dunbar J . (2005). Computational improvements reveal great bacterial diversity and high metal toxicity in soil. Science 309: 1387–1390.
Girvan MS, Campbell CD, Killham K, Prosser JI, Glover LA . (2005). Bacterial diversity promotes community stability and functional resilience after perturbation. Environ Microbiol 7: 301–313.
Jiang X, Wright AL, Wang X, Liang F . (2011). Tillage-induced changes in fungal and bacterial biomass associated with soil aggregates: a long-term field study in a subtropical rice soil in china. Appl Soil Ecol 48: 168–173.
Jost L . (2007). Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88: 2427–2439.
Kumaresan D, Stralis-Pavese N, Abell GCJ, Bodrossy L, Murrell JC . (2011). Physical disturbance to ecological niches created by soil structure alters community composition of methanotrophs. Env Microbiol Rep 3: 613–621.
Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N . (2009). Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microb 75: 5111–5120.
Marschner P, Marhan S, Kandeler E . (2012). Microscale distribution and function of soil microorganisms in the interface between rhizosphere and detritusphere. Soil Biol Biochem 49: 174–183.
McGrath KC, Mondav R, Sintrajaya R, Slattery B, Schmidt S, Schenk PM . (2010). Development of an environmental functional gene microarray for soil microbial communities. Appl Environ Microb 76: 7161–7170.
Morales SE, Holben WE . (2011). Linking bacterial identities and ecosystem processes: can 'omic' analyses be more than the sum of their parts? FEMS Microbiol Ecol 75: 2–16.
Mummey DL, Stahl PD . (2004). Analysis of soil whole- and inner-microaggregate bacterial communities. Microb Ecol 48: 41–50.
Naeem S, Duffy JE, Zavaleta E . (2012). The functions of biological diversity in an age of extinction. Science 336: 1401–1406.
Pallud C, Dechesne A, Gaudet JP, Debouzie D, Grundmann GL . (2004). Modification of spatial distribution of 2,4-dichloro-phenoxyacetic acid degrader microhabitats during growth in soil columns. Appl Environ Microb 70: 2709–2716.
Pietramellara G, Ascher J, Borgogni F, Ceccherini MT, Guerri G, Nannipieri P . (2009). Extracellular DNA in soil and sediment: fate and ecological relevance. Biol Fert Soils 45: 219–235.
Poll C, Thiede A, Wermbter N, Sessitsch A, Kandeler E . (2003). Micro-scale distribution of microorganisms and microbial enzyme activities in a soil with long-term organic amendment. Eur J Soil Sci 54: 715–724.
Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J et al (2007). Silva: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 7188–7196.
Ranjard L, Poly F, Combrisson J, Richaume A, Gourbiere F, Thioulouse J et al (2000). Heterogeneous cell density and genetic structure of bacterial pools associated with various soil microenvironments as determined by enumeration and DNA fingerprinting approach (RISA). Microb Ecol 39: 263–272.
Ruamps LS, Nunan N, Chenu C . (2011). Microbial biogeography at the soil pore scale. Soil Biol Biochem 43: 280–286.
Saiya-Cork KR, Sinsabaugh RL, Zak DR . (2002). The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biol Biochem 34: 1309–1315.
Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB et al (2009). Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 7537–7541.
van Zyl WH, du Plessis L, Rose SH . (2010). Exploring improved endoglucanase expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl Microbiol Biotech 86: 1503–1511.
Wang Y, Morimoto S, Ogawa N, Fujii T . (2011). A survey of the cellular responses in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 growing in sterilized soil by microarray analysis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78: 220–232.
White JR, Nagarajan N, Pop M . (2009). Statistical methods for detecting differentially abundant features in clinical metagenomic samples. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000352.
Wooley JC, Godzik A, Friedberg I . (2010). A primer on metagenomics. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000667.
Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN et al (2009). A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of bacteria and archaea. Nature 462: 1056–1060.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Microbial Communities Initiative LDRD Program at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, a multiprogram national laboratory operated by Battelle for the DOE under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on The ISME Journal website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bailey, V., Fansler, S., Stegen, J. et al. Linking microbial community structure to β-glucosidic function in soil aggregates. ISME J 7, 2044–2053 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.87
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.87
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Soil pH indirectly determines Ralstonia solanacearum colonization through its impacts on microbial networks and specific microbial groups
Plant and Soil (2023)
-
Elevated atmospheric CO2 alters the microbial community composition and metabolic potential to mineralize organic phosphorus in the rhizosphere of wheat
Microbiome (2022)
-
Microscale heterogeneity of soil bacterial communities under long-term fertilizations in fluvo-aquic soils
Soil Ecology Letters (2022)
-
Different Degrees of Niche Differentiation for Bacteria, Fungi, and Myxomycetes Within an Elevational Transect in the German Alps
Microbial Ecology (2019)
-
Divergent responses of bacterial activity, structure, and co-occurrence patterns to long-term unbalanced fertilization without nitrogen, phosphorus, or potassium in a cultivated vertisol
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2019)
