Abstract
Stochastic mechanisms are ubiquitous in biological systems. Biochemical reactions that involve small numbers of molecules are intrinsically noisy, being dominated by large concentration fluctuations1,2,3. This intrinsic noise has been implicated in the random lysis/lysogeny decision of bacteriophage-λ4, in the loss of synchrony of circadian clocks5,6 and in the decrease of precision of cell signals7. We sought to quantitatively investigate the extent to which the occurrence of molecular fluctuations within single cells (biochemical noise) could explain the variation of gene expression levels between cells in a genetically identical population (phenotypic noise). We have isolated the biochemical contribution to phenotypic noise from that of other noise sources by carrying out a series of differential measurements. We varied independently the rates of transcription and translation of a single fluorescent reporter gene in the chromosome of Bacillus subtilis, and we quantitatively measured the resulting changes in the phenotypic noise characteristics. We report that of these two parameters, increased translational efficiency is the predominant source of increased phenotypic noise. This effect is consistent with a stochastic model of gene expression in which proteins are produced in random and sharp bursts. Our results thus provide the first direct experimental evidence of the biochemical origin of phenotypic noise, demonstrating that the level of phenotypic variation in an isogenic population can be regulated by genetic parameters.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gillespie, D.T. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 81, 2340–2361 (1977).
McAdams, H.H. & Arkin, A. It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. Trends Genet. 15, 65–69 (1999).
McAdams, H.H. & Arkin, A. Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 814–819 (1997).
Arkin, A., Ross, J. & McAdams, H.H. Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage λ-infected Escherichia coli cells. Genetics 149, 1633–1648 (1998).
Elowitz, M.B. & Leibler, S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403, 335–338 (2000).
Barkai, N. & Leibler, S. Biological rhythms: circadian clocks limited by noise. Nature 403, 267–268 (2000).
Berg, O.G., Paulsson, J. & Ehrenberg, M. Fluctuations and quality of control in biological cells: zero-order ultrasensitivity reinvestigated. Biophys. J. 79, 1228–1236 (2000).
Thieffry, D., Huerta, A.M., Pérez-Rueda, E. & Collado-Vides, J. From specific gene regulation to genomic networks: a global analysis of transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli. BioEssays 20, 433–440 (1998).
Lutz, R. & Bujard, H. Independent and tight regulation of the transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 1203–1210 (1997).
LØbner-Olesen, A. Distribution of minichromosomes in individual Escherichia coli cells: implications for replication control. EMBO J. 18, 1712–1721 (1999).
Vellanoweth, R.L. & Rabinowitz, J.C. The influence of ribosome-binding-site elements on translational efficiency in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli in vivo. Mol. Microbiol. 6, 1105–1114 (1992).
Thattai, M. & & van Oudenaarden, A. Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8614–8619 (2001).
Paulsson, J., Berg, O.G. & Ehrenberg, M. Stochastic focusing: fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7148–7153 (2000).
von Dassow, G., Meir, E., Munro, E.M. & Odell, G.M. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406, 188–192 (2000).
Becskei, A. & Serrano, L. Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation. Nature 405, 590–593 (2000).
Chapon, C. Expression of malT, the regulator gene of the maltose regulon in Escherichia coli, is limited both at transcription and translation. EMBO J. 1, 369–374 (1982).
Trotot, P. et al. Comparative analysis of the cya locus in enterobacteria and related Gram-negative facultative anaerobes. Biochimie 78, 277–287 (1996).
Botsford, J.L. & Harman, J.G. Cyclic AMP in prokaryotes. Microbiol. Rev. 56, 100–122 (1992).
Spudich, J.L. & Koshland Jr, D.E. Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell. Nature 262, 467–471 (1976).
Levi, M.D., Morton-Firth, C.J., Abouhamad, W.N., Bourret, R.B. & Bray, D. Origins of individual swimming behavior in bacteria. Biophys. J. 74, 175–181 (1998).
Ptashne, M. et al. Autoregulation and function of a repressor in bacteriophage λ. Science 194, 156–161 (1976).
Weiss, R., Homsy, G.E. & Knight Jr, T.F., Towardin vivodigital circuits. Proceedings of the DIMACS Workshop on Evolution as Computation(1999).
Hasty, J., McMillen, D., Isaacs, F. & Collins, J.J. Computational studies of gene regulatory networks: in numero molecular biology. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 268–279 (2001).
Gardner, T.S., Cantor, C.R. & Collins, J.J. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature 403, 339–342 (2000).
Kepler, T.B. & Elston, T.C. Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences and mathematical representations. Biophys. J. 81, 3116–3136 (2001).
Plumbridge, J. How to achieve constitutive expression of a gene within an inducible operon: the example of the nagC gene of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol 178, 2629–2636 (1996).
Baumeister, R., Flache, P., Melefors, O., von Gabain, A. & Hillen, W. Lack of a 5′ non-coding region in Tn1721 encoded tetRmRNA is associated with a low efficiency of translation and a short half-life in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 4595–4600 (1991).
Kelley, R.L. & Yanofsky, C. trp aporepressor production is controlled by autogenous regulation and inefficient translation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 3120–3124 (1982).
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Bell, E.M. Judd, H.H. McAdams, W.F. Burkholder and R. Weiss for critically reviewing the manuscript. E.O. was funded through a Merck fellowship. This work was supported by the Edgerly Science Partnership fund, DARPA and a National Science Foundation CAREER award.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ozbudak, E., Thattai, M., Kurtser, I. et al. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nat Genet 31, 69–73 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng869
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng869
