Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Testing quantum correlations versus single-particle properties within Leggett’s model and beyond

Abstract

Quantum theory predicts and experiments confirm that nature can produce correlations between distant events that are non-local in the sense of violating a Bell inequality1. Nevertheless, Bell’s strong sentence ‘Correlations cry out for explanations’ (ref. 2) remains relevant. The maturing of quantum information science and the discovery of the power of non-local correlations, for example for cryptographic key distribution beyond the standard quantum key distribution schemes3,4,5, strengthen Bell’s wish and make it even more timely. In 2003, Leggett proposed an alternative model for non-local correlations6 that he proved to be incompatible with quantum predictions. We present here a new approach to this model, along with new inequalities for testing it. These inequalities can be derived in a very simple way, assuming only the non-negativity of probability distributions; they are also stronger than previously published and experimentally tested Leggett-type inequalities6,7,8,9. The simplest of the new inequalities is experimentally violated. Then we go beyond Leggett’s model, and show that we cannot ascribe even partially defined individual properties to the components of a maximally entangled pair.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Alice’s (green) and Bob’s (red) measurement settings used to test inequality (4).
Figure 2: Experimental set-up.
Figure 3: Violation of Leggett’s model.
Figure 4: Experimental test of the generalized Leggett inequality for different degrees of purity η.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell, J. S. On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, J. S. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics 152 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett, J., Hardy, L. & Kent, A. No signaling and quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010503 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Acín, A., Gisin, N. & Masanes, L. From Bell’s theorem to secure quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 120405 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Acín, A. et al. Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leggett, A. J. Nonlocal hidden-variable theories and quantum mechanics: An incompatibility theorem. Found. Phys. 33, 1469–1493 (2003).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gröblacher, S. et al. An experimental test of non-local realism. Nature 446, 871–875 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Paterek, T. et al. Experimental test of nonlocal realistic theories without the rotational symmetry assumption. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 210406 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Branciard, C. et al. Experimental falsification of Leggett’s nonlocal variable model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 210407 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Popescu, S. & Rohrlich, D. Quantum nonlocality as an axiom. Found. Phys. 24, 379–385 (1994).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Stefanov, A., Zbinden, H., Gisin, N. & Suarez, A. Quantum correlations with spacelike separated beam splitters in motion: Experimental test of multisimultaneity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 120404 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stefanov, A., Zbinden, H., Gisin, N. & Suarez, A. Quantum entanglement with acousto-optic modulators: Two-photon beats and Bell experiments with moving beam splitters. Phys. Rev. A 67, 042115 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Suarez, A. Nonlocal ‘realistic’ Leggett models can be considered refuted by the before–before experiment. Found. Phys. 38, 583–589 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Colbeck, R. & Renner, R. Hidden variable models for quantum theory cannot have any local part. Preprint at <http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.2218> (2008).

  15. Cerf, N. J., Gisin, N., Massar, S. & Popescu, S. Simulating maximal quantum entanglement without communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 220403 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Toner, B. F. & Bacon, D. Communication cost of simulating Bell correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 187904 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brunner, N., Gisin, N. & Scarani, V. Entanglement and non-locality are different resources. New J. Phys. 7, 88 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Ekert and C. Simon for comments. C.B., N.B. and N.G. acknowledge financial support from the EU project QAP (IST-FET FP6-015848) and Swiss NCCR Quantum Photonics. A.L.L. and C.K. acknowledge ASTAR for financial support under SERC grant No 052 101 0043. This work is partly supported by the National Research Foundation and Ministry of Education, Singapore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cyril Branciard.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information and Supplementary Figure 1 (PDF 149 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Branciard, C., Brunner, N., Gisin, N. et al. Testing quantum correlations versus single-particle properties within Leggett’s model and beyond. Nature Phys 4, 681–685 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1020

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1020

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing