Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Random focusing of tsunami waves

Abstract

Tsunamis exhibit surprisingly strong height fluctuations. An in-depth understanding of the mechanisms that lead to these variations in wave height is a prerequisite for reliable tsunami forecasting. It is known, for example, that the presence of large underwater islands1 or the shape of the tsunami source2 can affect the wave heights. Here we show that the consecutive effect of even tiny fluctuations in the profile of the ocean floor (the bathymetry) can cause unexpectedly strong fluctuations in the wave height of tsunamis, with maxima several times higher than the average wave height. A novel approach combining stochastic caustic theory and shallow water wave dynamics allows us to determine the typical propagation distance at which the strongly focused waves appear. We demonstrate that owing to this mechanism the small errors present in bathymetry measurements can lead to drastic variations in predicted tsunami heights. Our results show that a precise knowledge of the ocean’s bathymetry is absolutely indispensable for reliable tsunami forecasts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Random focusing of a tsunami wave by the weakly fluctuating depth profile of the Indian Ocean.
Figure 2: Sensitivity of forecasts to errors in ocean topography.
Figure 3: Can we predict the mean distance to the strongest wave intensities?

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berry, M. V. Focused tsunami waves. Proc. R. Soc. A 463, 3055–3071 (2007).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanoglu, U. et al. Focusing of long waves with finite crest over constant depth. Proc. R. Soc. A 469, 20130015 (2013).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ward, S. N. & Day, S. Tsunami thoughts. Recorder J. Can. Soc. 30, 38–44 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Topinka, M. A. et al. Coherent branched flow in a two-dimensional electron gas. Nature 410, 183–186 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aidala, K. E. et al. Imaging magnetic focusing of coherent electron waves. Nature Phys. 3, 464–468 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maryenko, D. et al. How branching can change the conductance of ballistic semiconductor devices. Phys. Rev. B 85, 195329 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, B. & Heller, E. J. Stability of branched flow from a quantum point contact. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 236804 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolfson, M. A. & Tomsovic, S. On the stability of long-range sound propagation through a structured ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 2693–703 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Höhmann, R., Kuhl, U., Stöckmann, H.-J., Kaplan, L. & Heller, E. J. Freak waves in the linear regime: A microwave study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 093901 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barkhofen, S., Metzger, J. J., Fleischmann, R., Kuhl, U. & Stöckmann, H.-J. Experimental observation of a fundamental length scale of waves in random media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 183902 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. White, B. S. & Fornberg, B. On the chance of freak waves at sea. J. Fluid Mech. 355, 113–138 (1998).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Heller, E. Freak waves: Just bad luck, or avoidable? Europhys. News 36, 159–162 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heller, E. J., Kaplan, L. & Dahlen, A. Refraction of a Gaussian seaway. J. Geophys. Res. 113, C09023 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kulkarny, V. A. & White, B. Focusing of waves in turbulent inhomogeneous media. Phys. Fluids 25, 1770–1784 (1982).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaplan, L. Statistics of branched flow in a weak correlated random potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 184103 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Metzger, J. J., Fleischmann, R. & Geisel, T. Universal statistics of branched flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 020601 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Metzger, J. J., Fleischmann, R. & Geisel, T. Intensity fluctuations of waves in random media: What is the semiclassical limit? Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 013901 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Metzger, J. J., Fleischmann, R. & Geisel, T. Statistics of extreme waves in random media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 203903 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ward, S. N. in The Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology (ed. Meyers, R. A.) 175–191 (Academic Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sandwell, D., Gille, S. & Smith, W. Bathymetry from space: Oceanography, geophysics, and climate, geoscience professional services, Bethesda, Maryland (2002).

  21. Metzger, J. J. Branched Flow and Caustics in Two-Dimensional Random Potentials and Magnetic Fields PhD thesis, Niedersächsische Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen (2010).

  22. Stöckli, R., Vermote, E., Saleous, N., Simmon, R. & Herring, D. The Blue Marble Next Generation—A True Color Earth Dataset Including Seasonal Dynamics From MODIS (NASA Earth Observatory, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  23. George, D. L. Finite Volume Methods and Adaptive Refinement for Tsunami Propagation and Inundation PhD thesis, Univ. Washington (2006).

  24. Shankar, R. in Tsunamis and Nonlinear Waves (ed. Kundu, A.) 263–272 (Springer, 2007).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Berry, M. V. & Upstill, C. Catastrophe optics: Morphologies of caustics and their diffraction patterns. Prog. Opt. 18, 257–346 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dutykh, D. & Dias, F. Energy of tsunami waves generated by bottom motion. Proc. R. Soc. A 465, 725–744 (2009).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin, P. Numerical Modeling of Water Waves (Taylor and Francis, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kramer, T., Heller, E. J. & Parrott, R. E. An efficient and accurate method to obtain the energy-dependent Green’s function for general potentials. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 99, 012010 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank E. Bodenschatz for fruitful discussions. This work has been supported by the DFG research group 760.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The project was devised by J.J.M. and R.F., and developed jointly by all authors. All numerical work was performed by H.D. and J.J.M. The manuscript was written by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theo Geisel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Degueldre, H., Metzger, J., Geisel, T. et al. Random focusing of tsunami waves. Nature Phys 12, 259–262 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3557

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3557

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing