Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

An siRNA screen identifies the GNAS locus as a driver in 20q amplified breast cancer

Abstract

Poor-prognosis oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer is characterised by the presence of high-level focal amplifications. We utilised a focused small interfering RNA screen in 14 breast cancer cell lines to define genes that were pathogenic in three genomic regions focally amplified in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, 8p11-12, 11q13 and 20q. Silencing the GNAS locus, that encodes the G protein alpha stimulatory subunit Gαs, specifically reduced the growth of 20q amplified breast cancer cell lines. Examination of a publically available small hairpin RNA data set confirmed GNAS silencing to be selective for 20q amplified cancer cell lines. Cell lines with 20q amplification were found to overexpress specifically the extra long Gαs splice variant (XLαs). Overexpression of XLαs induced cAMP levels to a greater extent than Gαs, suggesting that amplification of the GNAS locus, and overexpression of the XLαs variant in particular, enhanced cAMP signalling. GNAS silencing in amplified cell lines reduced extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation, and conversely overexpression of exogenous XLαs in a non-amplified cell line increased MEK–ERK1/2 phosphorylation, identifying one potential downstream consequence of enhanced cAMP signalling. Our data indicate that amplification of the GNAS locus may contribute to the pathogenesis of breast cancer, and highlight a previously unrecognised role for the GNAS XLαs variant in cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chin K, DeVries S, Fridlyand J, Spellman PT, Roydasgupta R, Kuo WL et al. Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. Cancer Cell 2006; 10: 529–541.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Curtis C, Shah SP, Chin SF, Turashvili G, Rueda OM, Dunning MJ et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 2012; 486: 346–352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, Holt JA, Wong SG, Keith DE et al. Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science 1989; 244: 707–712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 783–792.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Courjal F, Cuny M, Simony-Lafontaine J, Louason G, Speiser P, Zeillinger R et al. Mapping of DNA amplifications at 15 chromosomal localizations in 1875 breast tumors: definition of phenotypic groups. Cancer Res 1997; 57: 4360–4367.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sircoulomb F, Nicolas N, Ferrari A, Finetti P, Bekhouche I, Rousselet E et al. ZNF703 gene amplification at 8p12 specifies luminal B breast cancer. EMBO Mol Med 2011; 3: 153–166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Holland DG, Burleigh A, Git A, Goldgraben MA, Perez-Mancera PA, Chin SF . ZNF703 is a common Luminal B breast cancer oncogene that differentially regulates luminal and basal progenitors in human mammary epithelium. EMBO Mol Med 2011; 3: 167–180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Turner N, Pearson A, Sharpe R, Lambros M, Geyer F, Lopez-Garcia MA et al. FGFR1 amplification drives endocrine therapy resistance and is a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Cancer Res 2010; 70: 2085–2094.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiss J, Sos ML, Seidel D, Peifer M, Zander T, Heuckmann JM et al. Frequent and focal FGFR1 amplification associates with therapeutically tractable FGFR1 dependency in squamous cell lung cancer. Sci Transl Med 2010; 2: 62ra93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Collins C, Rommens JM, Kowbel D, Godfrey T, Tanner M, Hwang SI et al. Positional cloning of ZNF217 and NABC1: genes amplified at 20q13.2 and overexpressed in breast carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 8703–8708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nonet GH, Stampfer MR, Chin K, Gray JW, Collins CC, Yaswen P . The ZNF217 gene amplified in breast cancers promotes immortalization of human mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 1250–1254.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gelsi-Boyer V, Orsetti B, Cervera N, Finetti P, Sircoulomb F, Rouge C et al. Comprehensive profiling of 8p11-12 amplification in breast cancer. Mol Cancer Res 2005; 3: 655–667.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ormandy CJ, Musgrove EA, Hui R, Daly RJ, Sutherland RL . Cyclin D1, EMS1 and 11q13 amplification in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003; 78: 323–335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hodgson JG, Chin K, Collins C, Gray JW . Genome amplification of chromosome 20 in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003; 78: 337–345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stephens PJ, McBride DJ, Lin ML, Varela I, Pleasance ED, Simpson JT et al. Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes. Nature 2009; 462: 1005–1010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Brough R, Frankum JR, Sims D, Mackay A, Mendes-Pereira AM, Bajrami I et al. Functional viability profiles of breast cancer. Cancer Discov 2011; 1: 260–273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Prahallad A, Sun C, Huang S, Di Nicolantonio F, Salazar R, Zecchin D et al. Unresponsiveness of colon cancer to BRAF(V600E) inhibition through feedback activation of EGFR. Nature 2012; 483: 100–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mackay A, Tamber N, Fenwick K, Iravani M, Grigoriadis A, Dexter T et al. A high-resolution integrated analysis of genetic and expression profiles of breast cancer cell lines. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 118: 481–498.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neve RM, Chin K, Fridlyand J, Yeh J, Baehner FL, Fevr T et al. A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. Cancer Cell 2006; 10: 515–527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Beroukhim R, Getz G, Nghiemphu L, Barretina J, Hsueh T, Linhart D et al. Assessing the significance of chromosomal aberrations in cancer: methodology and application to glioma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 20007–20012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Press MF, Sauter G, Buyse M, Bernstein L, Guzman R, Santiago A et al. Alteration of topoisomerase II-alpha gene in human breast cancer: association with responsiveness to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 859–867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang L, Yang N, Huang J, Buckanovich RJ, Liang S, Barchetti A et al. Transcriptional coactivator Drosophila eyes absent homologue 2 is up-regulated in epithelial ovarian cancer and promotes tumor growth. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 925–932.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barretina J, Caponigro G, Stransky N, Venkatesan K, Margolin AA, Kim S et al. The Cancer cell line encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature 2012; 483: 603–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheung HW, Cowley GS, Weir BA, Boehm JS, Rusin S, Scott JA et al. Systematic investigation of genetic vulnerabilities across cancer cell lines reveals lineage-specific dependencies in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 12372–12377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wadhawan S, Dickins B, Nekrutenko A . Wheels within wheels: clues to the evolution of the Gnas and Gnal loci. Mol Biol Evol 2008; 25: 2745–2757.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Z, Turan S, Wehbi VL, Vilardaga JP, Bastepe M . Extra-long Galphas variant XLalphas protein escapes activation-induced subcellular redistribution and is able to provide sustained signalling. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 38558–38569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Mariot V, Wu JY, Aydin C, Mantovani G, Mahon MJ, Linglart A et al. Potent constitutive cyclic AMP-generating activity of XLalphas implicates this imprinted GNAS product in the pathogenesis of McCune-Albright syndrome and fibrous dysplasia of bone. Bone 2011; 48: 312–320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Luttrell DK, Luttrell LM . Not so strange bedfellows: G-protein-coupled receptors and Src family kinases. Oncogene 2004; 23: 7969–7978.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Consonni SV, Gloerich M, Spanjaard E, Bos JL . cAMP regulates DEP domain-mediated binding of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Epac1 to phosphatidic acid at the plasma membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 3814–3819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Enserink JM, Christensen AE, de Rooij J, van Triest M, Schwede F, Genieser HG et al. A novel Epac-specific cAMP analogue demonstrates independent regulation of Rap1 and ERK. Nat Cell Biol 2002; 4: 901–906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldsmith ZG, Dhanasekaran DN . G protein regulation of MAPK networks. Oncogene 2007; 26: 3122–3142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bos JL, Rehmann H, Wittinghofer A . GEFs and GAPs: critical elements in the control of small G proteins. Cell 2007; 129: 865–877.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmitt JM, Stork PJ . PKA phosphorylation of Src mediates cAMP's inhibition of cell growth via Rap1. Mol Cell 2002; 9: 85–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dhillon AS, Pollock C, Steen H, Shaw PE, Mischak H, Kolch W . Cyclic AMP-dependent kinase regulates Raf-1 kinase mainly by phosphorylation of serine 259. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22: 3237–3246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith FD, Langeberg LK, Cellurale C, Pawson T, Morrison DK, Davis RJ et al. AKAP-Lbc enhances cyclic AMP control of the ERK1/2 cascade. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12: 1242–1249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Freda PU, Chung WK, Matsuoka N, Walsh JE, Kanibir MN, Kleinman G et al. Analysis of GNAS mutations in 60 growth hormone secreting pituitary tumors: correlation with clinical and pathological characteristics and surgical outcome based on highly sensitive GH and IGF-I criteria for remission. Pituitary 2007; 10: 275–282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kan Z, Jaiswal BS, Stinson J, Janakiraman V, Bhatt D, Stern HM et al. Diverse somatic mutation patterns and pathway alterations in human cancers. Nature 2010; 466: 869–873.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu J, Matthaei H, Maitra A, Dal Molin M, Wood LD, Eshleman JR et al. Recurrent GNAS mutations define an unexpected pathway for pancreatic cyst development. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3: 92ra66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Turner NC, Lord CJ, Iorns E, Brough R, Swift S, Elliott R et al. A synthetic lethal siRNA screen identifying genes mediating sensitivity to a PARP inhibitor. EMBO J 2008; 27: 1368–1377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Aydin C, Aytan N, Mahon MJ, Tawfeek HA, Kowall NW, Dedeoglu A et al. Extralarge XL(alpha)s (XXL(alpha)s), a variant of stimulatory G protein alpha-subunit (Gs(alpha)), is a distinct, membrane-anchored GNAS product that can mimic Gs(alpha). Endocrinology 2009; 150: 3567–3575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Natrajan R, Weigelt B, Mackay A, Geyer FC, Grigoriadis A, Tan DS et al. An integrative genomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals molecular pathways and networks regulated by copy number aberrations in basal-like, HER2 and luminal cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 121: 575–589.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Natrajan R, Lambros MB, Rodriguez-Pinilla SM, Moreno-Bueno G, Tan DS, Marchio C et al. Tiling path genomic profiling of grade 3 invasive ductal breast cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15: 2711–2722.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Barretina J, Caponigro G, Stransky N, Venkatesan K, Margolin AA, Kim S et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature 2012; 483: 603–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Murat Bastepe for supplying cDNA contructs for Gαs and XLαs. This work was supported by grants from Cancer Research UK and Breakthrough Breast Cancer. Dr Nicholas Turner is a CRUK Clinician Scientist. We acknowledge NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N C Turner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on the Oncogene website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garcia-Murillas, I., Sharpe, R., Pearson, A. et al. An siRNA screen identifies the GNAS locus as a driver in 20q amplified breast cancer. Oncogene 33, 2478–2486 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2013.202

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2013.202

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links