Illness severity scores are essential for NICU outcome comparisons and should predict both morbidity and mortality. Current validated scores include CRIB (clinical risk index for babies < 1500g, 6 items) and SNAP-PE (SNAP perinatal extension, 37 items). We have evaluated the ability of NAPPI-ES(neonatal acute physiology parameters index, extended score)(14 items) to predict morbidity. Outcomes: Data and variables needed to calculate SNAP, SNAP-PE and CRIB were collected from 10,213 infants in 17 Canadian NICUs in 1996. The development of NAPPI-ES and its validation for prediction of neonatal mortality is described elsewhere. Grade 3 IVH, periventricular leucomalacia, intraparenchymal echogenicity or hydrocephalus were classified as adverse cerebral outcomes (n=347). Chronic lung disease (CLD) was defined as oxygen dependency at 28 days (n=436). Logistic regression of the scores against the outcomes was used to calculate probabilities of the outcomes. NAPPI-ES SNAP-PE and CRIB were compared using area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) to assess their predictive ability in infants of all birthweights and in infants under 1500 g (n=2005). Results: Both NAPPI-ES and SNAP-PE are as effective as CRIB in prediction of adverse cerebral outcome and are better predictors of CLD among infants < 1500g(p< 0.0001). NAPPI-ES and SNAP-PE are significantly better than CRIB (p< 0.0001) in predicting morbidity for all birth weights. NAPPI-ES compares well with SNAP-PE in prediction of morbidity among infants of all birth weights. Table

Table 1 No caption available.
Full size table

Log in or create a free account to read this content

Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com

Access through your institution

or

Sign in or create an account
Continue with Google
Continue with ORCiD