Abstract
Erythropoiesis, the process underlying the production of red blood cells, which are essential for oxygen transport, involves the development of hematopoietic stem cells into mature red blood cells. This review focuses on the critical roles of transcription factors and epigenetic mechanisms in modulating gene expression critical for erythroid differentiation. It emphasizes the significance of chromatin remodeling in ensuring gene accessibility, a key factor for the orderly progression of erythropoiesis. This review also discusses how dysregulation of these processes can lead to erythroid disorders and examines the promise of genome editing and gene therapy as innovative therapeutic approaches. By shedding light on the genomic regulation of erythropoiesis, this review suggests avenues for novel treatments for hematological conditions, underscoring the need for continued molecular studies to improve human health.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Erythropoiesis, the process of red blood cell formation, is a fundamental pillar of human physiology, ensuring the efficient transport of oxygen from the lungs to tissues across the body. This complex process is initiated in the embryonic stage and continues throughout an individual’s life, adapting to the body’s changing needs from early development through adulthood. The journey of an erythroid cell from a pluripotent hematopoietic stem cell in the bone marrow to a fully mature, enucleated erythrocyte in the bloodstream exemplifies the remarkable complexity and precision inherent in human biology. This review explores the multifaceted stages of erythropoiesis, highlighting the genome-level and molecular mechanisms that govern the differentiation and maturation of erythroid cells. It delves into the roles of key transcription factors and epigenetic modifications in orchestrating these processes, the advancements in ex vivo erythroblast production for research and therapeutic purposes, and the consequences of pathway dysregulation leading to various erythroid disorders. By focusing on genomic-level regulation, this review sheds light on the intricate nature of erythropoiesis and provides insights into potential therapeutic targets for addressing erythroid disorders and advancing therapeutic strategies.
Generation and maturation of erythroid cells
Erythropoiesis is an essential process for oxygen transport that occurs throughout life, from embryonic development to adulthood. This process evolves in complexity from primitive to definitive erythropoiesis, adapting to the changing requirements of the body from the embryonic stage, through fetal development, to lifelong maintenance1. Primitive erythroblasts, which are large nucleated cells, fulfill the oxygen requirements of early embryos but are soon replaced by more efficient erythrocytes produced through definitive erythropoiesis. In adults, erythropoiesis predominantly occurs in the bone marrow, where the process is regulated to yield mature, enucleated red blood cells that are optimal for oxygen carriage.
The widely accepted model posits that erythropoiesis is initiated when hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the bone marrow differentiate into myeloid progenitors2,3. The progenitors further differentiate into erythroid progenitors, specifically the burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) and subsequently the colony-forming unit-erythroid (CFU-E). The CFU-E matures through several erythroblast stages—proerythroblast, basophilic, polychromatic, and orthochromatic erythroblast—synthesizing hemoglobin and undergoing cellular transformations in preparation for enucleation. The orthochromatic erythroblast expels its nucleus to form a reticulocyte, which enters the bloodstream and matures into a functional erythrocyte within approximately one week. The resultant biconcave, an enucleated cell-laden with hemoglobin, is primed for effective oxygen transport (Fig. 1).
HSC hematopoietic stem cell, BFU-E burst-forming unit-erythroid, CFU-E colony-forming unit-erythroid, ProE proerythroblast, BasoE basophilic erythroblast, PolyE polychromatic erythroblast, OrthoE orthochromatic erythroblast.
The production of erythroblasts in liquid culture from CD34+ cells or stem cells represents a significant research avenue in regenerative medicine and hematological studies. This ex vivo process begins with the isolation of CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, which are recognized for their capacity to differentiate into various blood cell types, including erythroblasts. In a carefully controlled liquid culture environment, these CD34+ cells are exposed to a specific combination of growth factors and cytokines, prominently erythropoietin (EPO), which is essential for erythroid differentiation4,5. Additional factors, such as stem cell factor (SCF) and interleukin-3 (IL-3), may augment the proliferation and maturation of erythroid cells. Over time, the CD34+ cells proliferate and begin to differentiate into erythroblasts, undergoing stages of maturation characterized by changes in morphology and hemoglobin synthesis and, ultimately, loss of the cell nucleus to form reticulocytes. This ex vivo production of erythroblasts offers a valuable model for studying erythropoiesis, understanding disorders of red blood cell development, and potentially providing a source of erythroblasts for therapeutic purposes.
In addition, cell lines have traditionally played a crucial role in enhancing our understanding of erythropoiesis. The human chronic myeloid leukemia cell line K562 exhibits multipotent characteristics and can be directed to differentiate along the erythroid lineage when exposed to specific inducers that mimic physiological cues for erythropoiesis6. This capability makes K562 cells an invaluable model for studying various aspects of human erythropoiesis. Similarly, murine erythroleukemia cells derived from mouse erythroleukemia can also be induced and differentiated into erythroid lineage cells, providing valuable insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying erythropoiesis7. Another mouse cell line, G1E/G1ER cells, exhibits a conditional expression of GATA-1, a key regulator of erythroid development, facilitating studies that require precise temporal regulation of gene expression during erythropoiesis8,9. Despite noticeable differences between mouse and human erythropoiesis, such as the expression of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) and globin gene regulation patterns, mouse models remain indispensable. The conservation of major transcriptional regulators across species suggests that the fundamental aspects of erythropoiesis can still be effectively studied using these model systems, particularly for developmental research, genetic manipulations, and exploring in vivo interactions10,11.
Genomic regulation of erythropoiesis
Regulating erythropoiesis at the genomic level involves a complex network of mechanisms directing the expression of genes essential for the development, maturation, and function of erythrocytes. Central to this regulatory system are transcription factors and epigenetic modifications, which collaborate to finely tune the expression of specific genes throughout various erythropoiesis stages. The discourse begins with an exploration of key transcription factors, underscoring their significant contributions to the regulation of erythroid gene expression and erythrocyte production. Effective gene regulation within this context requires alterations in the epigenetic landscape, notably modifications in the accessibility of erythroid lineage-specific cis elements to transcription factors. In the subsequent section, we delve into how DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin remodeling impact erythrocyte development. Each component plays a crucial role in a comprehensive regulatory network that orchestrates the smooth progression of erythropoiesis, manipulating the chromatin environment to either promote or inhibit gene expression as necessary.
Transcription factors
GATA-1
GATA-1 is a pivotal transcription factor in the regulation of erythropoiesis and is distinguished by its affinity for the GATA motif12,13,14, which is found in regulatory elements of all erythroid-expressed genes. It plays an essential role in activating genes vital for erythroid cell differentiation and maturation, including those encoding globins, heme biosynthesis enzymes, and erythroid cell membrane proteins15,16,17,18,19. GATA-1 is expressed in distinct lineages within the hematopoietic system, such as erythroid, megakaryocytic, eosinophil, and mast cell lineages, and its loss leads to defects in the maturation processes of erythroid and megakaryocyte populations, underscoring its pivotal role in hematopoietic lineage fidelity12,20,21,22. In addition, GATA-1 has been shown to collaborate with multiple cofactors, including FOG-1 (friend of GATA), PU.1, and p300/CBP, highlighting its central role in orchestrating the regulation of genes essential for hematopoietic lineage development and maturation processes20,23,24. These cooperative interactions potentially enhance its regulatory capabilities, ensuring precise control over the differentiation and maturation of blood cells.
TAL1/SCL
TAL1/SCL, a basic helix–loop–helix transcription factor, is crucial for early hematopoiesis. TAL1 knockout mice exhibit embryonic lethality due to an absence of hematopoiesis, and TAL1-deficient embryonic stem cells fail to contribute to any hematopoietic lineages in adult chimeric mice25,26. At the molecular level, TAL1 functions by dimerizing with the E proteins E12/E47 and binding to the E-box DNA motif within the promoters and enhancers of target genes, modulating their transcriptional activity27,28. This regulatory mechanism is essential for the proper expression of genes involved in cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation within the hematopoietic system. Moreover, TAL1 interacts with cofactors, including LMO2, GATA-1, LDB1, and RUNX1, to form transcriptional complexes that enhance its specificity and functional impact on hematopoiesis. Aberrant expression of TAL1, resulting from genetic anomalies such as chromosomal translocations, has been implicated in the development of hematologic malignancies, notably T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL)29,30. A comprehensive understanding of the role of TAL1 in normal hematopoiesis and its dysregulation in leukemogenesis emphasizes its importance as a potential therapeutic target in blood disorders.
KLF1/erythroid Krüppel-like factor (EKLF)
KLF1, also known as EKLF, is distinguished by binding to a specific DNA sequence, CCM-CRC-CCN, through its C2H2 zinc finger DNA-binding domains31. It is indispensable for the terminal progression of erythroid cell development and maturation and plays a pivotal role in regulating β-globin gene expression32,33,34. Targeted inactivation of the KLF1 gene in mice leads to a defect in hemoglobin production, resulting in lethal β-thalassemia, and mutations in this gene are associated with altered globin regulatory patterns35. In the final stages of erythroid maturation, the transition from proliferation to differentiation is carefully coordinated, partly through the regulation of the cell cycle. Transcriptomic analysis of KLF1 knockout mice revealed significant disturbances in gene networks responsible for cell cycle control36. In fact, the loss of KLF1 results in improper entry into the S phase during erythropoiesis, underscoring the crucial role of KLF1 in ensuring proper cell cycle progression37.
c-MYB
c-Myb, an evolutionarily conserved transcription factor, is pivotal for the proliferation, differentiation, and survival of hematopoietic cells38,39,40,41. Knockout of exon 6 in the c-Myb gene in mice allows the generation of primitive erythrocytes but results in defects in definitive hematopoiesis42,43. This observation is consistent with the results of antisense RNA experiments targeting Myb in human bone marrow mononuclear cells, further emphasizing the essential function of c-Myb in the regulation of adult hematopoiesis44. The expression level of c-Myb influences hematopoietic cell fate, with high levels being pivotal for erythroblast formation, directing cells toward differentiation rather than proliferation45,46. On the other hand, ectopic c-Myb expression is associated with hematopoietic malignancies, where continuous c-Myb expression interferes with the genetic program governing myeloid differentiation47. This highlights the complex role of c-Myb in supporting normal hematopoiesis and its contribution to the pathogenesis of blood cancers.
Cis-regulatory elements
A crucial aspect of understanding erythropoiesis at the molecular level involves examining the regulatory regions that control gene expression, notably the locus control region (LCR) and the globin locus. Located upstream of the 5′ end of the β-globin gene cluster, the LCR functions as an enhancer that interacts with specific promoters of globin genes to alter chromatin structure and ensure tissue-specific and developmental stage-specific expression48. This region, composed of several hypersensitive sites, is essential for the proper transcriptional regulation of globin genes during erythroid differentiation. It allows the binding of various transcription factors, including GATA-1, NF-E2, and TAL1, which efficiently and precisely regulate hemoglobin synthesis and erythroid development49,50,51. This sophisticated regulatory mechanism underscores the complexity of genetic control in erythropoiesis and illustrates how uniquely programmed gene expression is fine-tuned to meet the physiological demands of oxygen transport in mammals.
Epigenetic modifications
DNA methylation and histone modifications
DNA methylation has been extensively studied for its critical role in development and exhibits lineage-specific patterns in hematopoiesis52,53,54,55,56,57. It undergoes widespread dynamic changes, often aligning with lineage-associated enhancers and transcription factor-binding sites, highlighting the role of DNA methylation in the differentiation and maturation of erythroid cells58,59. Furthermore, genes implicated in DNA methylation are critical for shaping the landscape of hematopoietic differentiation54,60,61. The key factors involved in the DNA methylation process include DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), such as DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B, which are responsible for adding methyl groups to DNA, thereby modulating gene expression52,55,60. Additionally, the ten–eleven translocation (TET) enzymes, including TET1, TET2, and TET3, play complementary roles by catalyzing the conversion of methylcytosine to hydroxymethylcytosine, facilitating DNA demethylation52,53,60. This dynamic interplay between methylation and demethylation by DNMTs and TET enzymes, respectively, is crucial for the precise regulation of gene expression, impacting the differentiation and maturation of erythroid cells within the complex process of hematopoiesis.
Concurrently, histone modifications—namely, methylation, acetylation, and phosphorylation—serve as an additional layer of epigenetic regulation, influencing chromatin structure and facilitating transcriptional regulation, which is essential for erythroid differentiation62. These modifications modulate chromatin accessibility by either promoting transcription factor binding and gene expression or compacting chromatin to suppress gene activity. For example, histone acetylation is often associated with the activation of erythroid-specific genes, while methylation may signal either gene activation or repression, depending on the residues that are modified63. The key players in these processes include histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs), which are crucial epigenetic modifiers54,64,65. HATs add acetyl groups to histones, leading to an open chromatin structure that facilitates gene expression. Conversely, HDACs remove these acetyl groups, resulting in a more compact chromatin structure and gene repression. This dynamic interplay among HATs, HDACs, and other epigenetic modifiers, such as histone methyltransferases, is pivotal in regulating erythroid development and maturation62,66,67,68,69. The aberrant expression of these factors can disrupt this delicate balance, leading to hematological malignancies, underscoring the critical role of epigenetic regulation in maintaining hematopoietic health and preventing disease.
Chromatin remodeling
The dynamic structuring of chromatin is fundamental for the ability of transcription factors to access cis-elements, facilitating the sequential activation and repression of gene expression, which is crucial for the various stages of erythropoiesis. Chromatin remodeling factors are pivotal in this process because they adjust chromatin accessibility to the transcriptional machinery, influencing gene expression patterns. By repositioning nucleosomes and altering chromatin compaction, these remodelers enable the precise temporal and spatial regulation of genes required for erythroid development. For example, the SWI/SNF complex, an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler, is recruited through interactions with master transcription factors involved in erythropoiesis, altering nucleosome structure and regulating erythroid development70,71,72,73. Similarly, the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylation complex, in collaboration with transcription factors such as FOG-1, induces changes in chromatin accessibility, a process essential for maintaining lineage fidelity and reinforcement during hematopoiesis74,75,76. Recently, this intricate narrative of chromatin’s role in erythropoiesis has been further enriched by findings on the inner nuclear protein Matrin-3, which negatively affects cell fate transitions in erythroid cells by stabilizing chromatin organization, adding a new dimension to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing erythroid development77 (Fig. 2).
Transcription factors and epigenetic modifications collaborate to precisely regulate gene expression during erythropoiesis. Chromatin remodeling factors and nuclear proteins modify chromatin architecture, making erythroid lineage-specific cis elements accessible to transcription factors. This adjustment is crucial for the orderly progression of erythropoiesis, guiding the development from HSCs to mature red blood cells.
Erythroid disorders and treatment
The transformation of HSCs to mature blood cells involves a complex, highly regulated process. At each step, a network of regulatory mechanisms ensures the precise activation of genes necessary for guiding cells to their specific destinies. Disruptions in this balanced system can lead to a range of hematopoietic disorders. For example, irregularities in red blood cell differentiation can result in inadequate development and maturation, leading to conditions such as anemia. Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA) is a rare congenital disorder caused by mutations in ribosomal protein genes, resulting in insufficient production of red blood cells due to defects in erythroid maturation78,79. Similarly, β-thalassemia is characterized by reduced or absent β-globin synthesis, leading to ineffective erythropoiesis and decreased mature red blood cell counts, thus causing anemia80,81.
Furthermore, altered gene expression related to cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation can initiate the clonal expansion of abnormal cells, a critical step in the development of hematopoietic malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). AML results from the transformation of hematopoietic stem or early myeloid progenitor cells in the bone marrow to malignant clones, primarily due to genetic mutations and chromosomal abnormalities82,83,84. This results in the uncontrolled growth of abnormal cells, which accumulate in the bone marrow and enter the bloodstream, thereby impairing healthy blood cell production. Erythroleukemia, an AML subtype, specifically affects red blood cell precursors, causing anemia and related symptoms85,86. Additionally, recent studies have shown that clonal hematopoiesis, characterized by the expansion of cells carrying specific somatic mutations, can contribute to hematopoietic dysfunction87. These clonal expansions, often related to age, have been reported to be associated with an increased risk of developing anemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and AML88,89,90. This highlights the importance of maintaining delicate equilibrium in blood cell development and the significant consequences of its disruption, particularly within the erythroid lineage.
Over the past two decades, advancements in genomics, single-cell omics, and CRISPR-Cas9 technologies have significantly enhanced our understanding of the genetic factors involved in erythroid development and disorders. For instance, genomics has revealed a comprehensive landscape of gene expression and regulatory factors crucial for erythropoiesis, and single-cell omics have enabled the detailed analysis of cellular heterogeneity at various stages of blood formation91,92,93. Moreover, CRISPR/Cas9 technology represents a significant technological advance, offering not only precise functional analyses of specific genes but also therapeutic opportunities to correct genetic defects94,95. The utilization of these technologies has facilitated the identification and analysis of mutations associated with a range of hematopoietic disorders96,97. The accumulation of genomic insights plays a crucial role in both research and clinical applications, driving the development and enhancement of targeted therapies.
For genetic erythroid disorders such as β-thalassemia, DBA, and certain erythroleukemias, innovative treatments are increasingly focusing on the genetic root causes of these diseases. Gene therapy, especially through targeting the Bcl11a gene, has shown promise in mitigating symptoms of conditions such as β-thalassemia and sickle cell disease (SCD). BCL11A is integral to hemoglobin regulation and the silencing of HbF in adult red blood cells. Downregulation of BCL11A significantly benefits SCD and β-thalassemia patients by reactivating HbF production, which in turn reduces disease severity98. By utilizing CRISPR-Cas9 and other technologies to modulate gene expression, this approach involves modifying patients’ HSCs to decrease BCL11A expression, thereby promoting HbF production99,100. After these engineered cells are reintroduced into the patient, they have the potential not only to alleviate symptoms but also to offer a durable, potentially curative treatment by directly addressing the genetic anomalies driving the disorder. This strategy, underscored by the FDA’s approval of the first CRISPR gene editing therapy (Casgevy), represents a significant shift toward treating the genetic basis of erythroid disorders rather than merely managing their symptoms.
Conclusion
The journey from a hematopoietic stem cell to a mature red blood cell encapsulates a remarkable narrative of cellular differentiation and genetic regulation. Erythropoiesis is a highly coordinated process, underpinned by the sequential activation and repression of genes, driven by a network of transcription factors, and modulated by epigenetic mechanisms. This review describes the landscape of erythroid cell generation and maturation, elucidating the complexity of regulatory pathways that ensure the efficient production of erythrocytes. The study of ex vivo erythroblast generation and the genomic regulation of erythropoiesis not only enhances our understanding of normal hematopoiesis but also sheds light on the pathogenesis of various erythroid disorders. Advances in genomic editing and gene therapy hold promise for addressing the root causes of these conditions, offering hope for the development of more effective and potentially curative treatments. As research progresses, the insights gained from studying erythropoiesis will undoubtedly contribute to the development of novel therapeutic strategies, improving outcomes for individuals affected by erythroid-related diseases. This exploration underscores the importance of continued investigation into the molecular underpinnings of erythropoiesis, paving the way for innovative approaches to combat hematological disorders and improve human health.
References
Palis, J., Robertson, S., Kennedy, M., Wall, C. & Keller, G. Development of erythroid and myeloid progenitors in the yolk sac and embryo proper of the mouse. Development 126, 5073–5084 (1999).
Dzierzak, E. & Philipsen, S. Erythropoiesis: development and differentiation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 3, a011601 (2013).
Orkin, S. H. & Zon, L. I. Hematopoiesis: an evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell 132, 631–644 (2008).
Giarratana, M. C. et al. Ex vivo generation of fully mature human red blood cells from hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 69–74 (2005).
Neildez-Nguyen, T. M. A. et al. Human erythroid cells produced ex vivo at large scale differentiate into red blood cells in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 467–472 (2002).
Klein, E. Properties of the K562 cell line derived from a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia. Int. J. Cancer 19, 136 (1977).
Tsiftsoglou, A. S. & Robinson, S. H. Differentiation of leukemic cell lines: a review focusing on murine erythroleukemia and human hl‐60 cells. Int. J. Cell Cloning 3, 349–366 (1985).
Weiss, M. J., Yu, C. & Orkin, S. H. Erythroid-cell-specific properties of transcription factor GATA-1 revealed by phenotypic rescue of a gene-targeted cell line. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1642–1651 (1997).
Tsang, A. P. et al. FOG, a multitype zinc finger protein, acts as a cofactor for transcription factor GATA-1 in erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation. Cell 90, 109–119 (1997).
Pishesha, N. et al. Transcriptional divergence and conservation of human and mouse erythropoiesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4103–4108 (2014).
Sankaran, V. G. et al. Developmental and species-divergent globin switching are driven by BCL11A. Nature 460, 1093–1097 (2009).
Tsai, S. F. et al. Cloning of cDNA for the major DNA-binding protein of the erythroid lineage through expression in mammalian cells. Nature 339, 446–451 (1989).
Evans, T. & Felsenfeld, G. The erythroid-specific transcription factor Eryf1: a new finger protein. Cell 58, 877–885 (1989).
Orkin, S. H. GATA-binding transcript ion factors in hematopoietic cells. Blood 80, 575–581 (2019).
Steiner, L. A. et al. Chromatin architecture and transcription factor binding regulate expression of erythrocyte membrane protein genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 5399–5412 (2009).
Martin, D. I. K. & Orkin, S. H. Transcriptional activation and DNA binding by the erythroid factor GF-1/ NF-E1/Eryf 1. Genes Dev. 4, 1886–1898 (1990).
Briegel, K. et al. Regulation and function of transcription factor GATA-1 during red blood cell differentiation. Development 122, 3839–3850 (1996).
Tanimura, N. et al. Mechanism governing heme synthesis reveals a GATA factor/heme circuit that controls differentiation. EMBO Rep. 17, 249–265 (2016).
Cheng, Y. et al. Erythroid GATA1 function revealed by genome-wide analysis of transcription factor occupancy, histone modifications, and mRNA expression. Genome Res. 19, 2172–2184 (2009).
Cantor, A. B. & Orkin, S. H. Coregulation of GATA factors by the Friend of GATA (FOG) family of multitype zinc finger proteins. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 117–128 (2005).
Fujiwara, Y., Browne, C. P., Cunniff, K., Goff, S. C. & Orkin, S. H. Arrested development of embryonic red cell precursors in mouse embryos lacking transcription factor GATA-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 12355–12358 (1996).
Stachura, D. L., Chou, S. T. & Weiss, M. J. Early block to erythromegakaryocytic development conferred by loss of transcription factor GATA-1. Blood 107, 87–97 (2006).
Lowry, J. A. & MacKay, J. P. GATA-1: one protein, many partners. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 38, 6–11 (2006).
Morceau, F., Schnekenburger, M., Dicato, M. & Diederich, M. GATA-1: Friends, brothers, and coworkers. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci. 1030, 537–554 (2004).
Porcher, C. et al. The T cell leukemia oncoprotein SCL/tal-1 is essential for development of all hematopoietic lineages. Cell 86, 47–57 (1996).
Robb, L. et al. The scl gene product is required for the generation of all hematopoietic lineages in the adult mouse. EMBO J. 15, 4123–4129 (1996).
Porcher, C., Chagraoui, H. & Kristiansen, M. S. SCL/TAL1: a multifaceted regulator from blood development to disease. Blood 129, 2051–2060 (2017).
Palii, C. G. et al. Differential genomic targeting of the transcription factor TAL1 in alternate haematopoietic lineages. EMBO J. 30, 494–509 (2011).
Finger, L. R. et al. Involvement of the TCL5 gene on human chromosome 1 in T-cell leukemia and melanoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 5039–5043 (1989).
Sanda, T. et al. Core transcriptional regulatory circuit controlled by the TAL1 complex in human T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Cell 22, 209–221 (2012).
Malyavantham, K. S. et al. Identifying functional neighborhoods within the cell nucleus: proximity analysis of early S-phase replicating chromatin domains to sites of transcription, RNA polymerase II, HP1γ, matrin 3 and SAF-A. J. Cell. Biochem. 105, 391–403 (2008).
Borg, J. et al. Haploinsufficiency for the erythroid transcription factor KLF1 causes hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin. Nat. Genet. 42, 801–807 (2010).
Perkins, A. C., Sharpe, A. H. & Orkin, S. H. Lethal β-thalassaemia in mice lacking the erythroid CACCC-transcription factor EKLF. Nature 25, 318–322 (1995).
Nuez, B., Michalovich, D., Bygrave, A., Ploemacher, R. & Grosveld, F. Defective haematopoiesis in fetal liver resulting from inactivation of the EKLF gene. Nature 375, 316–318 (1995).
Waye, J. S. & Eng, B. Krüppel-like factor 1: hematologic phenotypes associated with KLF1 gene mutations. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 37, 78–84 (2015).
Pilon, A. M. et al. Failure of terminal erythroid differentiation in EKLF-deficient mice is associated with cell cycle perturbation and reduced expression of E2F2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 7394–7401 (2008).
Tallack, M. R., Keys, J. R., Humbert, P. O. & Perkins, A. C. EKLF/KLF1 controls cell cycle entry via direct regulation of E2f2. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 20966–20974 (2009).
Soza-Ried, C., Hess, I., Netuschil, N., Schorpp, M. & Boehm, T. Essential role of c-myb in definitive hematopoiesis is evolutionarily conserved. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17304–17308 (2010).
Oh, I. H. & Reddy, E. P. The myb gene family in cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis. Oncogene 18, 3017–3033 (1999).
Greig, K. T., Carotta, S. & Nutt, S. L. Critical roles for c-Myb in hematopoietic progenitor cells. Semin. Immunol. 20, 247–256 (2008).
Davidson, C. J., Tirouvanziam, R., Herzenberg, L. A. & Lipsick, J. S. Functional evolution of the vertebrate Myb gene family: B-Myb, but neither A-Myb nor c-Myb, complements drosophila Myb in hemocytes. Genetics 169, 215–229 (2005).
Wang, X., Angelis, N. & Thein, S. L. MYB—A regulatory factor in hematopoiesis. Gene 665, 6–17 (2018).
Mucenski, M. L. et al. A functional c-myb gene is required for normal murine fetal hepatic hematopoiesis. Cell 65, 677–689 (1991).
Gewirtz, A. M. & Calabretta, B. A c-myb antisense oligodeoxynucleotide inhibits normal human hematopoiesis in vitro. Science 242, 1303–1306 (1988).
Vegiopoulos, A., García, P., Emambokus, N. & Frampton, J. Coordination of erythropoiesis by the transcription factor c-Myb. Blood 107, 4703–4710 (2006).
Emambokus, N. et al. Progression through key stages of haemopoiesis is dependent on distinct threshold levels of c-Myb. EMBO J. 22, 4478–4488 (2003).
Selvakumaran, M., Liebermann, D. A. & Hoffman-Liebermann, B. Deregulated c-myb disrupts interleukin-6- or leukemia inhibitory factor-induced myeloid differentiation prior to c-myc: role in leukemogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 2493–2500 (1992).
Hanscombe, O. et al. Importance of globin gene order for correct developmental expression. Genes Dev. 5, 1387–1394 (1991).
A.stamatoyannopoulos, J., Goodwin, A., Joyce, T. & Lowrey, C. H. NF-E2 and GATA binding motifs are required for the formation of DNase I hypersensitive site 4 of the human β-globin locus control region. EMBO J. 14, 106–116 (1995).
Elnitski, L., Miller, W. & Hardison, R. Conserved E boxes function as part of the enhancer in hypersensitive site 2 of the β-globin locus control region: role of basic helix–loop–helix proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 369–378 (1997).
Liang, S., Moghimi, B., Yang, T. P., Strouboulis, J. & Bungert, J. Locus control region mediated regulation of adult β-globin gene expression. J. Cell. Biochem. 105, 9–16 (2008).
Smith, Z. D. & Meissner, A. DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 204–220 (2013).
Greenberg, M. V. C. & Bourc’his, D. The diverse roles of DNA methylation in mammalian development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 590–607 (2019).
Ji, H. et al. Comprehensive methylome map of lineage commitment from haematopoietic progenitors. Nature 467, 338–342 (2010).
Bock, C. et al. DNA methylation dynamics during in vivo differentiation of blood and skin stem cells. Mol. Cell 47, 633–647 (2012).
Tagoh, H. et al. Dynamic reorganization of chromatin structure and selective DNA demethylation prior to stable enhancer complex formation during differentiation of primary hematopoietic cells in vitro. Blood 103, 2950–2955 (2004).
Ginder, G. D., Gnanapragasam, M. N. & Mian, O. Y. The role of the epigenetic signal, DNA methylation, in gene regulation during erythroid development. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 82, 85–116 (2008).
Lessard, S., Beaudoin, M., Benkirane, K. & Lettre, G. Comparison of DNA methylation profiles in human fetal and adult red blood cell progenitors. Genome Med. 7, 1–12 (2015).
Bartholdy, B. et al. Mechanisms of establishment and functional significance of DNA demethylation during erythroid differentiation. Blood Adv. 2, 1833–1852 (2018).
Izzo, F. et al. DNA methylation disruption reshapes the hematopoietic differentiation landscape. Nat. Genet. 52, 378–387 (2020).
Yang, L. et al. DNMT3A loss drives enhancer hypomethylation in FLT3-ITD-associated leukemias. Cancer Cell 29, 922–934 (2016).
DeVilbiss, A. W. et al. Epigenetic determinants of erythropoiesis: role of the histone methyltransferase SetD8 in promoting erythroid cell maturation and survival. Mol. Cell. Biol. 35, 2073–2087 (2015).
Rice, K. L., Hormaeche, I. & Licht, J. D. Epigenetic regulation of normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Oncogene 26, 6697–6714 (2007).
Hattangadi, S. M., Wong, P., Zhang, L., Flygare, J. & Lodish, H. F. From stem cell to red cell: regulation of erythropoiesis at multiple levels by multiple proteins, RNAs, and chromatin modifications. Blood 118, 6258–6268 (2011).
Sun, X. J., Man, N., Tan, Y., Nimer, S. D. & Wang, L. The role of histone acetyltransferases in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Front. Oncol. 5, 1–11 (2015).
Wang, Y. et al. Impairment of human terminal erythroid differentiation by histone deacetylase 5 deficiency. Blood 138, 1615–1627 (2021).
Feng, Y. et al. Early mammalian erythropoiesis requires the Dot1L methyltransferase. Blood 116, 4483–4491 (2010).
Mei, Y., Liu, Y. & Ji, P. Understanding terminal erythropoiesis: An update on chromatin condensation, enucleation, and reticulocyte maturation. Blood Rev. 46, 100740 (2021).
Li, M. et al. Stage-specific dual function: EZH2 regulates human erythropoiesis by eliciting histone and non-histone methylation. Haematologica 108, 2487–2502 (2023).
Bultman, S. J., Gebuhr, T. C. & Magnuson, T. A Brg1 mutation that uncouples ATPase activity from chromatin remodeling reveals an essential role for SWI/SNF-related complexes in β-globin expression and erythroid development. Genes Dev. 19, 2849–2861 (2005).
Zhang, W., Kadam, S., Emerson, B. M. & Bieker, J. J. Site-specific acetylation by p300 or CREB binding protein regulates erythroid Krüppel-like factor transcriptional activity via its interaction with the SWI–SNF complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 2413–2422 (2001).
Peterson, C. L. & Workman, J. L. Promoter targeting and chromatin remodeling by the SWI/SNF complex. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 187–192 (2000).
Xu, Z., Meng, X., Cai, Y., Koury, M. J. & Brandt, S. J. Recruitment of the SWI/SNF protein Brg1 by a multiprotein complex effects transcriptional repression in murine erythroid progenitors. Biochem. J. 399, 297–304 (2006).
Miccio, A. et al. NuRD mediates activating and repressive functions of GATA-1 and FOG-1 during blood development. EMBO J. 29, 442–456 (2010).
Gregory, G. D. et al. FOG1 requires NuRD to promote hematopoiesis and maintain lineage fidelity within the megakaryocytic-erythroid compartment. Blood 115, 2156–2166 (2010).
Gao, Z. et al. FOG-1-mediated recruitment of NuRD is required for cell lineage re-enforcement during haematopoiesis. EMBO J. 29, 457–468 (2010).
Cha, H. J. et al. Inner nuclear protein Matrin-3 coordinates cell differentiation by stabilizing chromatin architecture. Nat. Commun. 12, 6241 (2021).
Da Costa, L., Leblanc, T. & Mohandas, N. Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Blood 136, 1262–1273 (2020).
Flygare, J. & Karlsson, S. Diamond–Blackfan anemia: erythropoiesis lost in translation. Blood 109, 3152–3160 (2007).
Oikonomidou, P. R. & Rivella, S. What can we learn from ineffective erythropoiesis in thalassemia? Blood Rev. 32, 130–143 (2018).
Ribeil, J. A. et al. Ineffective erythropoiesis in β-thalassemia. Sci. World J. 2013, 394295 (2013).
Pelcovits, A. & Niroula, R. Acute myeloid leukemia: a review. R. I. Med. J. (2013) 103, 38–40 (2020).
Porwit, A. & Vardiman, J. W. Acute myeloid leukemia with expanded erythropoiesis. Haematologica 96, 1241–1243 (2011).
Stone, R. M., O'Donnell, M. R. & Sekeres, M. A. Acute myeloid leukemia. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program 1, 98–117 (2004).
Zuo, Z., Polski, J. M., Kasyan, A. & Medeiros, L. J. Acute erythroid leukemia. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 134, 1261–1270 (2010).
Boddu, P. et al. Erythroleukemia-historical perspectives and recent advances in diagnosis and management. Blood Rev. 32, 96–105 (2018).
Challen, G. A. & Goodell, M. A. Clonal hematopoiesis: mechanisms driving dominance of stem cell clones. Blood 136, 1590–1598 (2020).
Steensma, D. P. et al. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and its distinction from myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 126, 9–16 (2015).
Steensma, D. P. Does clonal hematopoiesis explain unexplained anemia? Blood 135, 1078–1080 (2020).
Ogawa, S. Clonal hematopoiesis in acquired aplastic anemia. Blood 128, 337–347 (2016).
Xu, J. et al. Combinatorial assembly of developmental stage-specific enhancers controls gene expression programs during human erythropoiesis. Dev. Cell 23, 796–811 (2012).
Xiang, G. et al. An integrative view of the regulatory and transcriptional landscapes in mouse hematopoiesis. Genome Res. 30, 472–484 (2020).
Xie, X. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic landscape of human blood cells. Natl Sci. Rev. 8, nwaa180 (2021).
Wagenblast, E. et al. Functional profiling of single CRISPR/Cas9-edited human long-term hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–11 (2019).
Lucas, D., O’Leary, H. A., Ebert, B. L., Cowan, C. A. & Tremblay, C. S. Utility of CRISPR/Cas9 systems in hematology research. Exp. Hematol. 54, 1–3 (2017).
Morris, J. A. et al. Discovery of target genes and pathways at GWAS loci by pooled single-cell CRISPR screens. Science 380, 1–44 (2023).
Miles, L. A. et al. Single-cell mutation analysis of clonal evolution in myeloid malignancies. Nature 587, 477–482 (2020).
Sankaran, V. G. et al. Human fetal hemoglobin expression is regulated by the developmental stage-specific repressor BCL11A. Science 322, 1839–1842 (2008).
Frangoul, H. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 252–260 (2021).
Esrick, E. B. et al. Post-transcriptional genetic silencing of BCL11A to treat sickle cell disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 205–215 (2021).
Acknowledgements
I thank Stuart Orkin for the advice and feedback on the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (RS-2023-00278512).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cha, H.J. Erythropoiesis: insights from a genomic perspective. Exp Mol Med 56, 2099–2104 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-024-01311-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-024-01311-1
This article is cited by
-
Circ_0001428 regulates erythropoiesis and γ-globin expression via activating the ATF4-BCL11A axis in β-thalassemia
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2026)
-
Advances in the characterization of in vitro–generated red blood cells: from biophysical properties to functional applications
Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2025)
-
Development and validation of a predictive model for postoperative hepatic dysfunction in Stanford type A aortic dissection
Scientific Reports (2025)




