Abstract
Placenta-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are emerging as critical regulators of maternal–fetal communication during pregnancy. These lipid bilayer-enclosed particles, primarily secreted by trophoblasts, transport bioactive cargos—including RNAs, proteins, lipids and neurotransmitters—that influence a wide range of developmental and immunological processes. While much attention has been given to their roles in maternal adaptation and health outcomes, recent studies highlight their direct impact on fetal development, particularly fetal brain development. Emerging evidence suggests that placental EVs may traverse both the placental and blood–brain barriers, thereby contributing to signaling processes that influence neurogenesis, cell fate specification and regional brain patterning. Their cargo composition is dynamic, modulated by gestational age and environmental factors such as air pollution, viral infection and chemical toxicants. These stressors can alter EV secretion and molecular content, contributing to adverse fetal outcomes including impaired organogenesis and neurodevelopmental delays. In this review, we synthesize current knowledge on placental EV biology, examine their roles in maternal and fetal health with an emphasis on neurodevelopment and evaluate how environmental exposures reshape EV-mediated signaling. We also discuss emerging technologies and translational opportunities, including EV-based diagnostics and therapeutic delivery systems. Collectively, placenta-derived EVs represent a vital yet underexplored mechanism in fetal programming, offering novel insights into the developmental origins of health and disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid bilayer-enclosed particles secreted by nearly all cell types. They carry diverse cargos—including nucleic acids, proteins and lipids—and serve as important mediators of intercellular communication1,2,3,4. Their composition reflects the physiological or pathological state of the originating cells, making them central to a wide range of biological processes5,6,7. EVs participate in vascular regulation (for example, blood coagulation)8,9,10, angiogenesis11, immune modulation12,13,14 and reticulocyte maturation2. They also play essential roles in pathological conditions such as inflammation12 and cancer15.
EVs are typically categorized into three major types based on their biogenesis: exosomes (originating from multivesicular bodies), microvesicles (formed via outward budding from the plasma membrane) and apoptotic bodies (released from dying cells)15 (Table 1). In addition to these well-established categories, recent studies have described novel EV subtypes that further expand the complexity of the EV landscape. These include ARRDC1-mediated microvesicles (ARMMs), which bud directly from the plasma membrane through the coordinated action of arrestin domain-containing protein 1 (ARRDC1) and tumor susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101)16,17. Other newly recognized subtypes include migrasomes, which are released from retraction fibers of migrating cells18,19, exophers, which facilitate the extrusion of damaged mitochondria and aggregated proteins20,21, and autophagic vesicles formed during autophagy22. These emerging vesicle types further underscore the heterogeneity and functional diversity within the EV population (Table 1). However, a clear consensus on EV classification remains elusive due to the inherent heterogeneity in their size, content and cellular origin. In response to this challenge, international initiatives—most notably by the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV)—are actively developing more comprehensive classification systems that integrate parameters such as vesicle size, molecular cargo and surface markers23. Given the existence of several in-depth reviews on EV classification and characterization24,25,26, these topics will not be covered in detail in this Review.
Among the diverse populations of EVs, placenta-derived EVs are uniquely substantial during pregnancy. Secreted by trophoblasts—particularly the syncytiotrophoblasts—placental EVs facilitate maternal–fetal communication by traversing biological barriers and influencing immune tolerance27, vascular development28,29 and maternal metabolic state30,31. While considerable research has focused on their impact on maternal physiology32,33, the potential of placental EVs to influence fetal development, especially fetal brain development, has only recently emerged as a major area of interest. This Review will (1) summarize current knowledge of placental EV biology and their roles in maternal health and pregnancy outcomes, (2) explore their roles in fetal health, with particular emphasis on neurodevelopment, (3) examine how environmental exposures shape placental EV composition and function, and (4) highlight key knowledge gaps and propose future directions for research.
Placental EVs and maternal–fetal health outcomes
Placental EVs—overview
Placental EVs are a unique and functionally diverse subset of EVs secreted by placental cells, most notably trophoblasts, which constitute the key interface between maternal and fetal tissues34,35,36. Advances in high-resolution flow cytometry have revealed that they predominantly range from 50 nm to 150 nm in diameter37. Among trophoblast subtypes, syncytiotrophoblasts—the multinucleated layer that directly contacts maternal blood—are the predominant source of EVs, releasing them continuously into maternal circulation throughout pregnancy38. According to RNA sequencing data, syncytiotrophoblasts are the second most abundant placental cell type, following cytotrophoblasts and preceding mesenchymal stromal cells39. However, it is important to note that current single-cell sequencing technologies may underrepresent the true number of syncytiotrophoblasts owing to technical limitations associated with capturing large, multinucleated cells.
The biological relevance of placental EVs has been demonstrated in multiple models. A landmark study by Sheller-Miller et al. used a cyclic recombinase fluorescent reporter mouse model, wherein fetal tissues expressed fluorescently labeled EV cargo40. These vesicles were subsequently detected in maternal blood, confirming fetal-to-maternal EV transfer. In a complementary experiment, maternal injection of engineered EVs with a tissue-specific fluorescent reporter led to altered fluorescence in fetal tissues, demonstrating maternal-to-fetal transfer of vesicles across the placental barrier and direct interaction and modulation of fetal physiology. This bidirectional trafficking underscores the role of placental EVs as active mediators of maternal–fetal communication38,41.
Surface markers of placental EVs
Characterizing placental EVs remains technically challenging due to their heterogeneous size, cellular origin and molecular composition. While general exosome markers such as CD9, CD63 and CD81 are frequently used for EV detection, they may fail to capture the full spectrum of vesicle subtypes and may overlook placenta-specific subpopulations42,43. One of the most widely recognized and reliable placenta-specific surface markers is placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP). This marker has been used in multiple studies to distinguish placental EVs from other circulating vesicles. In a longitudinal study by Sarker et al., the proportion of PLAP-positive (PLAP⁺) EVs in maternal blood was shown to increase progressively between gestational weeks 6 and 12, indicating a biologically regulated release and suggesting their potential utility as early biomarkers of pregnancy38. Similarly, Chen et al. used PLAP to isolate placental EVs from umbilical cord blood, reinforcing its practical value in EV identification during pathological pregnancies such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)41. In another study, Miranda et al. used PLAP to examine associations between total and placental EV concentrations and clinical outcomes such as birth weight, further supporting its use in perinatal research44.
EV isolation and characterization methods
Multiple techniques are used to isolate and characterize EVs. The gold standard remains differential ultracentrifugation, involving sequential centrifugation steps (300–2,000g for cells/debris, 10,000g for apoptotic bodies and ~100,000g for EVs) followed by sucrose or iodixanol density gradient purification to improve purity43. Other techniques include: (1) size exclusion chromatography: separates based on hydrodynamic size45; (2) polymer-based precipitation: fast and user-friendly but may co-isolate contaminants46; (3) immunoaffinity capture: enables enrichment of specific EV subtypes using antibodies (for example, anti-CD63 and anti-PLAP)47; and (4) microfluidic platforms: allow label-based or label-free high-throughput EV isolation based on physical properties such as charge and size48,49. Given the variability of methods, the ISEV has issued standardized guidelines (MISEV2023) to enhance cross-study reproducibility23. In studies relevant to this Review, PLAP-based immunocapture has been widely used to selectively isolate placenta-derived EVs from maternal or cord blood, allowing focused characterization of their properties and potential biomarker functions38,41,44.
In summary, placental EVs are biologically active particles predominantly secreted by trophoblasts—particularly syncytiotrophoblasts—that serve as a critical interface between maternal and fetal tissues. These vesicles, typically ranging from 50 nm to 150 nm in size, are released into maternal circulation throughout pregnancy in a manner that is tightly regulated by gestational age and pathological conditions. Placental EVs can traverse the placental barrier bidirectionally, mediating molecular communication from fetus to mother and vice versa, thereby playing an active role in maternal–fetal signaling. The use of placenta-specific surface markers such as PLAP has enabled the selective identification and enrichment of placenta-derived EVs from biological fluids. Longitudinal studies have demonstrated dynamic changes in PLAP⁺ EV levels during early pregnancy, suggesting their potential relevance to pregnancy physiology. As functionally important messengers, placental EVs are emerging as key contributors to maternal and fetal adaptation during gestation. The next section will explore in greater detail how these vesicles influence maternal and fetal health outcomes.
Placental EVs and maternal health and pregnancy outcomes
A successful pregnancy requires complex coordination between the maternal and fetal systems, involving immune tolerance27, vascular remodeling28,29 and metabolic adaptation30,31. Placental EVs are now recognized as essential mediators of this coordination, shaping maternal physiology through a wide array of signaling functions. These vesicles are dynamically released throughout gestation, with levels and cargo composition influenced by both developmental stage and pathological states38,41,50.
Gestational regulation of placental EV release
Placental EV production is tightly modulated by gestational age. Sarker et al. demonstrated that EV concentrations in maternal blood increase during the first trimester, suggesting a role in early placental signaling and maternal adaptation to pregnancy38. This developmental control is further indicated by the use of placenta-specific markers such as PLAP, which has been shown to increase between gestational weeks 6 and 1238. Kiu et al., using placental explants, estimated changes in EV secretion between weeks 8 and 12. While the number of EVs per milligram of explant tissue did not significantly change, accounting for the increase in placental weight revealed a substantial rise in the total amount of secreted EVs over the 4-week period51. These patterns support the view that placental EVs function as finely tuned messengers that reflect and help regulate the physiological state of pregnancy.
Maternal immune tolerance
One of the most remarkable adaptations in pregnancy is the maternal immune tolerance toward the semi-allogeneic fetus. This concept, first articulated by Peter Medawar, is supported by the phenomenon that fetal antigens can be present in maternal circulation without provoking immune rejection52. One mechanism contributing to this tolerance is the suppression of maternal immune cell proliferation and activity. Thibault et al. demonstrated that vesicles shed from the plasma membrane of syncytiotrophoblasts inhibited lymphocyte proliferation in vitro53. In addition, Mincheva-Nilsson et al. found that placental EVs carry major histocompatibility complex class I-related proteins A and B, which interact with receptors on natural killer cells to downregulate their activity—suggesting a mechanism for maternal immune evasion54. More broadly, placental EVs have been implicated in promoting this tolerance by delivering immunomodulatory molecules to maternal immune cells27. In vivo tracking studies using fluorescent reporter mice further support this function; placental EVs were shown to localize in maternal lungs and liver, where they interacted with both immune and non-immune cells27. Functional evidence was provided by the cleavage of fluorescent tags in recipient tissues, resulting in altered reporter signals and indicating direct modulation of cellular function40. Collectively, these findings suggest that placental EVs actively reprogram maternal immune responses, potentially inducing tolerogenic states that support fetal survival.
Pathological conditions during pregnancy
In pathological pregnancies, the quantity and composition of placental EVs are altered in ways that may contribute to disease pathogenesis. For instance, in GDM, Chen et al. found elevated levels of placental EVs in umbilical cord blood compared with normoglycemic pregnancies41. These EVs carry stress-responsive cargo, including microRNAs (miRNAs) and proteins reflective of the placenta’s metabolic state31,55, and may influence maternal insulin resistance or systemic inflammation. In preeclampsia, placental EVs exhibit heightened pro-inflammatory potential56. Ex vivo experiments using placental explants and maternal immune cells revealed that EVs from preeclamptic and early pregnancy samples induce stronger immune activation compared with those from term pregnancies56. Notably, preeclamptic EVs failed to induce lipopolysaccharide tolerance—a feature observed with EVs from normal pregnancies56—suggesting impaired immunomodulatory function and disrupted maternal immune adaptation. Infectious stressors can also modulate placental EV release. For example, Bergamelli et al. showed that HIPEC cytotrophoblast cells infected with human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) released significantly more EVs than uninfected controls50, suggesting that infectious triggers may amplify EV-mediated signaling and contribute to inflammatory complications.
In summary, placental EVs play a central role in orchestrating maternal adaptations necessary for a successful pregnancy (Fig. 1). They mediate immune tolerance, reflect the physiological state of the placenta and respond to pathological stimuli by altering their release and cargo composition. These vesicles are not only indicators but also potential contributors to conditions such as GDM and preeclampsia. Understanding their diverse functions provides critical insight into the mechanisms by which the placenta shapes maternal health. In the following section, we explore how these same vesicles influence fetal health and neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Placenta-derived EVs are actively secreted by trophoblasts and traverse the maternal–fetal interface to modulate both maternal and fetal physiology. In the maternal compartment, EVs contribute to immune tolerance, vascular remodeling and metabolic adaptation. In the fetal compartment, EVs influence organogenesis—including the heart, lungs and kidneys—and impact overall growth trajectories. These vesicles carry diverse cargo such as miRNAs, proteins and small molecules, and their composition dynamically responds to gestational stage and maternal environmental stressors, such as infection or metabolic dysregulation. The figure summarizes major sites of action and known roles of placental EVs in both maternal and fetal health outcomes. Figure created with BioRender.com.
Placental EVs and fetal health (non-neurological)
Placental EVs are increasingly recognized as active regulators of fetal organogenesis and growth, not merely as byproducts of placental turnover. By transferring bioactive cargo such as RNAs and proteins, these vesicles influence fetal development across multiple organ systems. The following sections highlight key studies supporting these roles (summarized in Table 2).
Cardiopulmonary development
The fetal heart and lungs are particularly susceptible to placental signals during the second trimester when rapid morphological differentiation occurs57,58. In a study by Jeyarajah et al., placental-specific deletion of Ovol2, a transcription factor expressed exclusively in placental tissue and not in fetal organs, resulted in defective fetal heart development and embryonic lethality59. The study elegantly demonstrated this by generating placenta-specific Ovol2-knockout mice using Tpbpa-Cre and observing severe cardiac hypoplasia and impaired cardiac contractility in embryos59. To dissect the mechanisms further, the researchers cultured fetal mouse hearts ex vivo in three conditions: (1) media conditioned by minced placental tissue, (2) media from Ovol2+ trophoblast stem cells and (3) media from Ovol2− knockout trophoblasts. Only groups 1 and 2 significantly improved cardiomyocyte outgrowth and beating rate, indicating that Ovol2-dependent placental signals—probably mediated in part by EVs—are necessary for heart maturation. In the pulmonary system, Chen et al. investigated the effects of GDM-associated placental EVs using an integrative in vitro–in vivo approach41. EVs were isolated from maternal blood of women with GDM, and 61 miRNAs were found to be differentially expressed. When these EVs were applied to A549 human alveolar epithelial cells, there was a marked reduction in cell proliferation, upregulation of apoptotic markers, and suppression of surfactant proteins A–D, which are essential for lung function and gas exchange after birth. The study extended to ex vivo lung explant cultures and in vivo mouse models, where GDM-derived EVs led to disrupted alveolar branching morphogenesis, delayed lung maturation and abnormal lung morphology, all of which recapitulated features of neonatal respiratory distress often seen in GDM-affected pregnancies41.
Renal development
Gu et al. explored how placental EVs may affect fetal kidney morphogenesis, particularly under oxidative stress conditions that mimic preeclampsia60. EVs were isolated from normal and oxidative-stressed human trophoblasts and applied to primary human glomerular endothelial cells (HGECs)60. Compared with EVs from healthy controls, those from stressed trophoblasts significantly reduced HGEC proliferation, tube formation and barrier function, suggesting vascular toxicity60. When these EVs were applied to mouse fetal kidney explants, researchers observed impaired ureteric branching, decreased vascular endothelial cadherin and occludin expression, and aberrant nephron development60. Importantly, intra-amniotic injection of the same EVs into pregnant mice confirmed these defects in vivo60, supporting the hypothesis that placental EVs under stress conditions can directly disrupt nephrogenesis and renal vascularization.
Fetal growth and birth weight correlation
EVs have also been implicated in modulating global fetal growth trajectories. In a cohort study by Miranda et al., the ratio of placental EVs (PLAP+) to total EVs in maternal plasma was positively correlated with neonatal birth weight and placental weight44. The EV profiles were measured during mid-gestation, and the study concluded that a higher relative abundance of placental EVs may reflect placental robustness and enhanced nutrient delivery44. Similarly, an epidemiological study by Fudono et al. demonstrated trimester-specific associations between certain EV-derived miRNAs—miR-127-3p and miR-26b-5p—and fetal growth outcomes, including birth-weight-for-gestational-age and the placenta-to-fetal weight ratio61. These miRNAs included those involved in growth factor signaling and metabolic regulation61, highlighting a time-sensitive effect of EV cargo composition on fetal growth parameters. In more severe pathological contexts, elevated EV concentrations and altered miRNA profiles in amniotic fluid and fetal tracheal aspirates were associated with poor survival outcomes in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia undergoing fetal intervention62. Another study found that maternal plasma levels of placental EVs correlated positively with fetal growth parameters, supporting their potential as indicators of intrauterine growth and risk of growth restriction44. These findings further demonstrate that placental EVs can reflect fetal compromise and developmental risk.
In summary, placental EVs contribute directly to the structural and functional development of multiple fetal organ systems—including the heart, lungs, kidneys and overall somatic growth (Fig. 1). Their composition and bioactivity are sensitive to maternal metabolic and inflammatory states, such as GDM or oxidative stress. The tissue-specific targeting and dynamic regulation of their cargo underscore the functional role of placental EVs as active modulators of fetal organogenesis rather than passive correlates. These findings lay the groundwork for further investigation into how placental EVs may be leveraged to understand or potentially modulate fetal health trajectories.
Placental EVs and fetal brain development
The fetal brain undergoes highly dynamic structural and functional changes during gestation, requiring precisely coordinated molecular signaling from both intrinsic and extrinsic sources. As vesicles capable of crossing both the placental barrier and the fetal blood–brain barrier (BBB), placental EVs are increasingly recognized as crucial intermediaries in placenta-to-brain communication, modulating early neurogenesis, regional patterning and cell fate decisions (Figs. 1 and 2).
Emerging evidence supports a model in which placental EVs act as key regulators of fetal brain development. These vesicles are hypothesized to cross both the placental and fetal BBBs, delivering regulatory signals such as noncoding RNAs, proteins and neurotransmitters such as serotonin to NPCs. Experimental studies show that placental EVs modulate pathways involved in neurogenesis, regional brain patterning and cell fate specification—shifting neural progenitor transcriptomes toward glial or neuronal lineages and altering key developmental programs including Wnt, Notch and axon guidance signaling. The illustration depicts these putative routes and targets of EV-mediated communication in the developing fetal brain. Figure created with BioRender.com.
Support for the role of EVs in fetal brain development first emerged from studies demonstrating their ability to reach the brain in vivo. In a pivotal study, EVs engineered with brain-targeting peptides and loaded with siRNA were injected into mouse circulation and later identified in brain tissue63. These EVs successfully mediated knockdown of specific mRNAs and proteins in the brain, providing compelling evidence that EVs can cross the BBB and influence neurological processes63. Further studies using placental EVs have shown their capacity to be internalized by endothelial barriers and trigger physiological changes. Notably, Cronqvist et al. demonstrated that placental EVs are predominantly taken up via clathrin-mediated endocytosis64 and that placental EVs traffic miRNAs to the mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum of primary epithelial cells65. These findings provide proof of concept that EVs—potentially including placenta-derived EVs—can deliver regulatory cargo to neural tissues in vivo. The successful penetration of the BBB by EVs opens the possibility that endogenous placental EVs might exert similar physiological roles during normal brain development.
Mechanistic insights into how placental EVs affect fetal neural development have come from in vitro coculture models using human and mouse neural progenitor cells (NPCs). Kinkade et al. isolated EVs from human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell-derived trophoblasts, including both small and long noncoding RNA cargo, and applied them to human fetal NPCs66. Transcriptomic profiling of the recipient NPCs revealed that these EVs upregulated genes involved in forebrain patterning, including those regulating Wnt, Notch and glial fate pathways66. Interestingly, exposure to trophoblast EVs led to a transcriptional shift in NPCs from neuronal to glial lineage specification66, suggesting that EV cargo actively influences regional and cell-type specification in the fetal brain. A complementary study using mouse trophoblast-derived EVs showed that these vesicles altered NPC transcriptional programs in a subtype- and origin-specific manner67. For instance, EVs derived from trophoblast stem cells and differentiated syncytiotrophoblasts induced distinct transcriptomic effects on NPCs, particularly in pathways related to neuronal polarity, axonal guidance and synaptic formation67. These observations point to a nuanced role for placental EVs in region-specific and cell-type-specific neural differentiation.
Placental EVs appear to carry bioactive small molecules with direct neurodevelopmental relevance. One such molecule is serotonin, a neurotransmitter known to play a pivotal role in early brain development, particularly in forebrain formation. In a 2024 study, mouse trophoblast-derived EVs were found to contain elevated concentrations of serotonin compared to control EVs67. This aligns with earlier findings by Bonnin et al., which identified the placenta as a transient and critical source of serotonin during early gestation before the fetal serotonergic system becomes functional68. The ability of serotonin-loaded EVs to cross both the placenta and the BBB suggests a targeted delivery mechanism through which trophoblasts influence neurotransmitter signaling in the fetal brain. Such signaling may contribute to critical developmental processes including neuronal maturation, synaptogenesis and the early shaping of neural circuits that influence later cognitive and behavioral trajectories (Fig. 2).
Taken together, these findings support a model in which placental EVs act as active and multifaceted regulators of fetal brain development (summarized in Table 2). By trafficking across the placental and fetal BBB and delivering developmentally relevant molecular signals—including RNAs, proteins, and bioactive small molecules such as serotonin—placental EVs may influence key neurodevelopmental processes such as neuronal differentiation, regional patterning and synaptogenesis. However, despite growing mechanistic insights from in vitro and animal models, critical knowledge gaps remain. The precise mechanisms by which specific EV subtypes selectively target neural cells, the temporal windows of vulnerability or responsiveness, and the dose–response relationships of EV-mediated signaling are still poorly understood. Moreover, direct evidence of placental EV trafficking and functional impact on the human fetal brain is lacking, largely due to the inaccessibility of fetal neural tissues and ethical limitations. As a result, many of the proposed functions remain hypothetical in the human context, underscoring the need for innovative translational approaches and noninvasive biomarkers to bridge preclinical findings with clinical relevance. Future studies using human organoid models, advanced imaging and longitudinal cohort analyses will be essential to clarify the contribution of placental EVs to human brain development and disease susceptibility.
Environmental exposures and placental EVs
The placenta serves as a dynamic interface between maternal and fetal environments and is highly responsive to external stressors69. A growing body of evidence suggests that placental EVs not only reflect these environmental insults but also participate in the signaling cascades that mediate their effects on fetal development. This section highlights how environmental exposures—including air pollution, infections and chemical toxicants—affect placental EV biology, with implications for fetal organogenesis and pregnancy outcomes (summarized in Table 3).
Air pollution and particulate matter
Airborne pollutants, particularly ultrafine particles and PM2.5, are among the most pervasive environmental threats during pregnancy and have been associated with adverse outcomes such as intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preterm birth and neurodevelopmental delays in children. Although the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood, placental EVs have emerged as likely intermediaries in this process. For instance, Dugershaw-Kurzer et al. exposed first-trimester placental explants to engineered nanoparticles, including metal oxides and diesel exhaust particles70. This exposure altered the placental secretome, with EVs showing anti-angiogenic profiles—such as reduced VEGF signaling and increased anti-angiogenic miRNAs70. These changes are particularly concerning given the critical role of early placental vascularization in supporting fetal oxygen and nutrient supply71. Perturbations in EV-mediated angiogenic signaling during this window could impair fetal organ development or contribute to IUGR70. A human cohort study by Wang et al. demonstrated that prenatal PM2.5 exposure was associated with neurodevelopmental delays in children, and these outcomes were correlated with differential miRNA expression in placental small EVs72. The altered miRNA profile included regulators of neurogenesis, synaptic signaling and oxidative stress responses72, underscoring the mechanistic role of EVs as transducers of pollutant-induced developmental toxicity.
Pathogenic infections
Similar EV-based mechanisms are increasingly implicated in infection-related pregnancy complications. Maternal infections such as Zika virus73, cytomegalovirus74 and coronavirus disease 201975 are well-known risk factors for adverse fetal outcomes, including microcephaly, sensorineural defects and increased perinatal mortality. Recent findings indicate that placental EVs play a role in pathogen-mediated signaling, potentially amplifying inflammatory responses or facilitating vertical transmission. In a model of Listeria monocytogenes infection, Kaletka et al. showed that infected mouse trophoblast stem cells secreted EVs with altered RNA and protein cargo, despite lacking direct bacterial protein contamination76. These EVs, when applied to macrophages, induced robust TNF-alpha secretion and heightened immune activation76. Interestingly, the same EVs increased susceptibility to repeat infection76, suggesting they may prime innate immune cells in a maladaptive manner. Meanwhile, HCMV was found to directly alter the protein composition of placental EVs50. Bergamelli et al. identified 31 viral proteins within HCMV-infected EVs, which were able to infect fetal NPCs in vitro and ex vivo50. This study provides direct evidence that EVs can act as carriers of viral components, facilitating placenta-to-brain transmission and increasing risk for fetal neuroinvasion and potential neurodevelopmental sequelae50.
Chemical toxicants and endocrine disruptors
Chemical toxicants and endocrine disruptors, such as bisphenol A (BPA) and cigarette smoke, exert diverse and complex effects on placental physiology. In a rat model, Ermini et al. showed that BPA exposure decreased the expression of the glucose transporter (GLUT1) and the carnitine transporter (CPT1) in fetal myocardium77. Interestingly, when cardiac cells were treated with EVs isolated from BPA-exposed placental cells, these EVs reversed the suppression of GLUT1 and CPT1, restoring metabolic gene expression to near-normal levels. This suggests that EVs may have protective or compensatory roles, possibly acting as adaptive messengers that buffer against direct chemical toxicity. In another study, Shepherd et al. demonstrated that uterine epithelial cells exposed to cigarette smoke extract or TNF secreted EVs induced a pro-inflammatory cascade in amnion epithelial cells and chorionic trophoblasts78. These EVs elevated expression of cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF, suggesting that environmental stressors can modulate paracrine inflammatory signaling across fetal membranes via EVs78.
Together, these findings highlight that environmental toxicants can significantly alter placental EV biology—not only in terms of their cargo and secretion levels, but also in their downstream impact on fetal tissue signaling. Depending on the context, EVs may serve as adaptive mediators that mitigate toxicant effects or as pathogenic messengers that exacerbate inflammation and developmental risk.
Future directions
Research on placental EVs has advanced substantially, progressing beyond descriptive studies into a dynamic field at the intersection of developmental biology, environmental health and translational medicine. As active mediators of maternal–fetal communication, placental EVs offer unique opportunities to uncover novel mechanisms of fetal development and to develop clinical tools for early diagnosis and intervention.
Dissecting functional cargo and mechanisms
A key priority for future research is to establish the causal roles of specific EV cargo—such as miRNAs, long noncoding RNAs, proteins and neuroactive small molecules such as serotonin—in directing fetal outcomes. While existing studies have documented correlations between EV cargo profiles and developmental phenotypes, direct functional validation remains limited. Future work should aim to uncover how individual cargo components modulate recipient cell signaling in a context- and tissue-specific manner. This could be achieved through integrative functional approaches that combine molecular perturbation with high-resolution mapping of downstream cellular responses across developing fetal tissues.
Advancing EV classification and standardization
Another critical challenge lies in the refinement of EV classification systems. Current nomenclature—based on vesicle size and presumed biogenesis—fails to capture the heterogeneity of placental EV populations. This is particularly problematic in the placental context, where vesicles may originate from different trophoblast subtypes and vary dramatically in content and function. Building upon emerging guidelines such as MISEV202323, future classification efforts should incorporate molecular cargo, surface markers and cell of origin to better distinguish functionally distinct EV subsets, including those derived from syncytiotrophoblasts, cytotrophoblasts and fetal tissues.
Technological innovation in tracking and functional studies
Emerging tools now enable real-time visualization and functional dissection of EV activity in vivo. These include fluorescent EV reporter mice (for example, CRE-loxP systems for cargo tracking)40, bioluminescent vesicle labeling for noninvasive imaging, and microfluidic EV chips for high-throughput cargo profiling49. Engineered vesicles—such as ARMMs—further expand the potential of EVs as delivery platforms for therapeutic molecules16,17,79,80. Numerous studies have utilized engineered vesicles through protein loading, hypoxic cell preconditioning or genetic modulation to promote tissue repair or treat diseases, including regeneration of tendons81 and skin82, among others83. Preclinical work has also demonstrated the ability of EVs to deliver antiviral proteins, such as IFITM3, across the placenta to protect the fetus84. However, direct evidence of placental EV transfer to the fetus in humans remains sparse. Most mechanistic insights come from rodent models or in vitro systems. To bridge this gap, the development of advanced human-relevant models—such as maternal–fetal interface organoids, placenta-on-a-chip devices and in vivo imaging techniques—will be essential to determine whether EV trafficking and function observed in animal models are recapitulated in human pregnancy.
EVs as biomarkers and interventional tools
Placental EVs also hold promise as early, noninvasive biomarkers of pregnancy health. They are detectable in maternal blood as early as the first trimester and reflect gestational age, placental condition and exposure to stressors. For example, PLAP+ EVs and miRNA cargo could be used to predict birth weight or risk of IUGR44. In addition, EV-based ‘liquid biopsies’ may detect fetal neurodevelopmental risk long before clinical symptoms appear85. Integrating EV profiling with multi-omics technologies—including proteomics, metabolomics and epigenomics—could yield sensitive biomarker signatures for fetal growth restriction, preterm birth risk or neurodevelopmental impairment. These advances may allow clinicians to detect fetal compromise or developmental delay long before clinical symptoms arise.
Integrating environmental exposure into EV research
Understanding how environmental exposures reshape EV biology is of growing importance. Exposure to air pollution, infections and chemical toxicants alters EV cargo, release dynamics and downstream signaling, with implications for fetal programming and long-term health70,72,73,74,75,76,77,78. Future studies should define the temporal and dose-dependent characteristics of these EV responses, assess whether the changes are adaptive or maladaptive, and investigate how they interact with maternal physiology to affect fetal outcomes. Importantly, EVs may act not only as messengers of environmental harm but also as compensatory regulators, and distinguishing these dual roles will be essential for identifying meaningful targets for intervention.
Together, these research directions will clarify the functional roles of placental EVs in fetal development, improve the reliability of EV-based diagnostics and unlock their potential as therapeutic tools. Bridging the current gaps between animal models, in vitro systems and human biology will be critical to ensure that placental EV research translates into meaningful improvements in maternal and child health.
Conclusion
Over the past decade, placenta-derived EVs have emerged as dynamic and multifunctional mediators of intrauterine signaling. Once regarded as cellular waste, these nanoscale vesicles are now recognized as central to maternal–fetal communication, capable of modulating immune function, vascular remodeling, organogenesis and even neurodevelopment. They carry diverse molecular cargo—including RNAs, proteins and bioactive metabolites—that reflect the physiological or pathological state of the placenta and have the potential to influence fetal health at a distance.
Placental EVs can traverse both the maternal–fetal interface and the BBB, potentially enabling them to deliver regulatory molecules such as serotonin to the developing brain. Under maternal stress conditions, including gestational diabetes or environmental exposures, these vesicles exhibit altered cargo and signaling patterns, suggesting a role in transmitting environmental influences to the fetus. Despite growing evidence from animal and in vitro studies, important gaps remain—particularly regarding their functional relevance in humans. The mechanisms of EV release, tissue targeting and direct transfer to fetal organs remain to be fully elucidated, underscoring the need for advanced human-relevant models and imaging technologies.
Looking ahead, placental EVs are poised to become powerful tools in both basic and clinical science. Their accessibility in maternal biofluids, molecular richness and responsiveness to physiological changes make them ideal candidates for noninvasive biomarkers of fetal well-being. Moreover, their potential as therapeutic vectors opens new possibilities for targeted fetal intervention. As research advances, interdisciplinary collaboration will be key to translating these insights into clinical practice. In an era increasingly defined by personalized and preventative medicine, placental EVs offer a promising avenue to better understand and safeguard fetal development—laying the foundation for healthier beginnings.
References
Harding, C., Heuser, J. & Stahl, P. Receptor-mediated endocytosis of transferrin and recycling of the transferrin receptor in rat reticulocytes. J. Cell Biol. 97, 329–339 (1983).
Pan, B.-T. & Johnstone, R. M. Fate of the transferrin receptor during maturation of sheep reticulocytes in vitro: selective externalization of the receptor. Cell 33, 967–978 (1983).
Palay, S. L. & Palade, G. E. The fine structure of neurons. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 1, 69–88 (1955).
Dalton, A. J. Microvesicles and vesicles of multivesicular bodies versus “virus-like” particles. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 54, 1137–1148 (1975).
Ratajczak, J. et al. Embryonic stem cell-derived microvesicles reprogram hematopoietic progenitors: evidence for horizontal transfer of mRNA and protein delivery. Leukemia 20, 847–856 (2006).
Valadi, H. et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 654–659 (2007).
Skog, J. et al. Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1470–1476 (2008).
Chargaff, E. & West, R. The biological significance of the thromboplastic protein of blood. J. Biol. Chem. 166, 189–197 (1946).
Castaman, G., Yu-Feng, L. & Rodeghiero, F. A bleeding disorder characterised by isolated deficiency of platelet microvesicle generation. Lancet 347, 700–701 (1996).
Heijnen, H. F. G., Schiel, A. E., Fijnheer, R., Geuze, H. J. & Sixma, J. J. Activated platelets release two types of membrane vesicles: microvesicles by surface shedding and exosomes derived from exocytosis of multivesicular bodies and α-granules. Blood 94, 3791–3799 (1999).
Deregibus, M. C. et al. Endothelial progenitor cell–derived microvesicles activate an angiogenic program in endothelial cells by a horizontal transfer of mRNA. Blood 110, 2440–2448 (2007).
Wang, J. G. et al. Monocytic microparticles activate endothelial cells in an IL-1β-dependent manner. Blood 118, 2366–2374 (2011).
Morelli, A. E. et al. Endocytosis, intracellular sorting, and processing of exosomes by dendritic cells. Blood 104, 3257–3266 (2004).
Raposo, G. et al. B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles. J. Exp. Med. 183, 1161–1172 (1996).
Yanez-Mo, M. et al. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J. Extracell. Vesicles 4, 27066 (2015).
Nabhan, J. F., Hu, R., Oh, R. S., Cohen, S. N. & Lu, Q. Formation and release of arrestin domain-containing protein 1-mediated microvesicles (ARMMs) at plasma membrane by recruitment of TSG101 protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4146–4151 (2012).
Wang, Q. & Lu, Q. Plasma membrane-derived extracellular microvesicles mediate non-canonical intercellular NOTCH signaling. Nat. Commun. 8, 709 (2017).
Ma, L. et al. Discovery of the migrasome, an organelle mediating release of cytoplasmic contents during cell migration. Cell Res. 25, 24–38 (2015).
Huang, Y. et al. Migrasome formation is mediated by assembly of micron-scale tetraspanin macrodomains. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 991–1002 (2019).
Melentijevic, I. et al. C. elegans neurons jettison protein aggregates and mitochondria under neurotoxic stress. Nature 542, 367–371 (2017).
Nicolás-Ávila, J. A. et al. A network of macrophages supports mitochondrial homeostasis in the heart. Cell 183, 94–109 (2020).
Hessvik, N. P. et al. PIKfyve inhibition increases exosome release and induces secretory autophagy. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73, 4717–4737 (2016).
Welsh, J. A. et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): from basic to advanced approaches. J. Extracell. Vesicles 13, e12404 (2024).
Sheta, M., Taha, E. A., Lu, Y. & Eguchi, T. Extracellular vesicles: new classification and tumor immunosuppression. Biology. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12010110 (2023).
Jeppesen, D. K., Zhang, Q., Franklin, J. L. & Coffey, R. J. Extracellular vesicles and nanoparticles: emerging complexities. Trends Cell Biol. 33, 667–681 (2023).
Doyle, L. M. & Wang, M. A.-O. Overview of extracellular vesicles, their origin, composition, purpose, and methods for exosome isolation and analysis. Cells. 8, 727 (2019).
Nguyen, S. L. et al. Integrins mediate placental extracellular vesicle trafficking to lung and liver in vivo. Sci. Rep. 11, 4217 (2021).
Salomon, C. et al. Extravillous trophoblast cells-derived exosomes promote vascular smooth muscle cell migration. Front. Pharm. 5, 175 (2014).
Cheung, S. et al. First trimester placental extracellular vesicles likely contribute to the vasodilation of maternal resistance arteries in normal pregnancy. Placenta 129, 84–86 (2022).
Kandzija, N. et al. Placental extracellular vesicles express active dipeptidyl peptidase IV; levels are increased in gestational diabetes mellitus. J. Extracell. Vesicles 8, 1617000 (2019).
Nair, S. et al. Human placental exosomes in gestational diabetes mellitus carry a specific set of miRNAs associated with skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity. Clin. Sci. 132, 2451–2467 (2018).
Feng, Y. et al. Normotensive placental extracellular vesicles provide long-term protection against hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 231, 350.e351–350.e324 (2024).
Gill, M. et al. Placental syncytiotrophoblast-derived extracellular vesicles carry active NEP (Neprilysin) and are increased in preeclampsia. Hypertension 73, 1112–1119 (2019).
Schmorl, G. Pathologisch-Anatomische Untersuchungen über Puerperal-Eklampsie (Vogel, 1893).
Lapaire, O., Holzgreve, W., Oosterwijk, J. C., Brinkhaus, R. & Bianchi, D. W. Georg Schmorl on trophoblasts in the maternal circulation. Placenta 28, 1–5 (2007).
Tong, M. & Chamley, L. W. Placental extracellular vesicles and feto-maternal communication. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 5, a023028 (2015).
Morgan, T. K. Cell- and size-specific analysis of placental extracellular vesicles in maternal plasma and pre-eclampsia. Transl. Res. 201, 40–48 (2018).
Sarker, S. et al. Placenta-derived exosomes continuously increase in maternal circulation over the first trimester of pregnancy. J. Transl. Med. 12, 204 (2014).
Campbell, K. A. et al. Placental cell type deconvolution reveals that cell proportions drive preeclampsia gene expression differences. Commun. Biol. 6, 264 (2023).
Sheller-Miller, S., Choi, K., Choi, C. & Menon, R. Cyclic-recombinase-reporter mouse model to determine exosome communication and function during pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 221, 502.e501–502.e512 (2019).
Chen, P. et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus impedes fetal lung development through exosome-dependent crosstalk between trophoblasts and lung epithelial cells. Int J. Nanomed. 18, 641–657 (2023).
Spitzberg, J. D. et al. Multiplexed analysis of EV reveals specific biomarker composition with diagnostic impact. Nat. Commun. 14, 1239 (2023).
Thery, C., Amigorena, S., Raposo, G. & Clayton, A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471143030.cb0322s30 (2006).
Miranda, J. et al. Placental exosomes profile in maternal and fetal circulation in intrauterine growth restriction—liquid biopsies to monitoring fetal growth. Placenta 64, 34–43 (2018).
Boing, A. N. et al. Single-step isolation of extracellular vesicles by size-exclusion chromatography. J. Extracell. Vesicles. https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v3.23430 (2014).
Yamada, T., Inoshima, Y., Matsuda, T. & Ishiguro, N. Comparison of methods for isolating exosomes from bovine milk. J. Vet. Med Sci. 74, 1523–1525 (2012).
Kim, G. et al. Noble polymeric surface conjugated with zwitterionic moieties and antibodies for the isolation of exosomes from human serum. Bioconjug. Chem. 23, 2114–2120 (2012).
Chen, C. et al. Microfluidic isolation and transcriptome analysis of serum microvesicles. Lab Chip 10, 505–511 (2010).
Bhagat, A. A., Kuntaegowdanahalli, S. S. & Papautsky, I. Continuous particle separation in spiral microchannels using Dean flows and differential migration. Lab Chip 8, 1906–1914 (2008).
Bergamelli, M. et al. Human cytomegalovirus modifies placental small extracellular vesicle composition to enhance infection of fetal neural cells in vitro. Viruses. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14092030 (2022).
Liu, H. et al. Estimation of the burden of human placental micro- and nano-vesicles extruded into the maternal blood from 8 to 12 weeks of gestation. Placenta 72–73, 41–47 (2018).
Medawar, P. B. Immunological tolerance. Nature 189, 14–17 (1961).
Thibault, G. et al. The inhibitory effect of human syncytiotrophoblast plasma membrane vesicles on in vitro lymphocyte proliferation is associated with reduced interleukin 2 receptor expression. Cell. Immunol. 138, 165–174 (1991).
Mincheva-Nilsson, L. et al. Placenta-derived soluble MHC class I chain-related molecules down-regulate NKG2D receptor on peripheral blood mononuclear cells during human pregnancy: a possible novel immune escape mechanism for fetal survival. J. Immunol. 176, 3585–3592 (2006).
Salomon, C. et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with changes in the concentration and bioactivity of placenta-derived exosomes in maternal circulation across gestation. Diabetes 65, 598–609 (2015).
Holder, B. S., Tower, C. L., Jones, C. J., Aplin, J. D. & Abrahams, V. M. Heightened pro-inflammatory effect of preeclamptic placental microvesicles on peripheral blood immune cells in humans. Biol. Reprod. 86, 103 (2012).
Wigglesworth, J. S. Lung development in the second trimester. Br. Med. Bull. 44, 894–908 (1988).
Mandarim-de-Lacerda, C. A. Morphometry of the human heart in the second and third trimesters of gestation. Early Hum. Dev. 35, 173–182 (1993).
Jeyarajah, M. J. et al. Placental extracellular vesicles promote cardiomyocyte maturation and fetal heart development. Commun. Biol. 7, 1254 (2024).
Gu, M. et al. Preeclampsia impedes foetal kidney development by delivering placenta-derived exosomes to glomerular endothelial cells. Cell Commun. Signal 21, 336 (2023).
Fudono, A. et al. Trimester-specific associations between extracellular vesicle microRNAs and fetal growth. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 35, 8728–8734 (2022).
Fabietti, I. et al. Extracellular vesicles and their miRNA content in amniotic and tracheal fluids of fetuses with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia undergoing fetal intervention. Cells. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10061493 (2021).
Alvarez-Erviti, L. et al. Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 341–345 (2011).
Cronqvist, T., Erlandsson, L., Tannetta, D. & Hansson, S. R. Placental syncytiotrophoblast extracellular vesicles enter primary endothelial cells through clathrin-mediated endocytosis.Placenta. 100, 133–141 (2020).
Cronqvist, T. et al. Syncytiotrophoblast derived extracellular vesicles transfer functional placental miRNAs to primary human endothelial cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 4558 (2017).
Kinkade, J. A. et al. Small and long non-coding RNA analysis for human trophoblast-derived extracellular vesicles and their effect on the transcriptome profile of human neural progenitor cells. Cells. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13221867 (2024).
Kinkade, J. A. et al. Extracellular vesicles from mouse trophoblast cells: effects on neural progenitor cells and potential participants in the placenta-brain axis. dagger Biol. Reprod. 110, 310–328 (2024).
Bonnin, A. et al. A transient placental source of serotonin for the fetal forebrain. Nature 472, 347–350 (2011).
Van Buren, E. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals placental response under environmental stress. Nat. Commun. 15, 6549 (2024).
Dugershaw-Kurzer, B. et al. Nanoparticles dysregulate the human placental secretome with consequences on angiogenesis and vascularization. Adv. Sci. 11, e2401060 (2024).
Meegdes, B. H., Ingenhoes, R., Peeters, L. L. & Exalto, N. Early pregnancy wastage: relationship between chorionic vascularization and embryonic development. Fertil. Steril. 49, 216–220 (1988).
Wang, P. et al. Prenatal fine particulate matter exposure associated with placental small extracellular vesicle derived microRNA and child neurodevelopmental delays. Sci. Total Environ. 841, 156747 (2022).
Ornelas, A. M. et al. Immune activation in amniotic fluid from Zika virus-associated microcephaly. Ann. Neurol. 81, 152–156 (2017).
Liu, P. H. et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection and the risk of hearing loss in childhood: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Med. 100, e27057 (2021).
Villar, J. et al. Maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality among pregnant women with and without COVID-19 infection: the INTERCOVID Multinational Cohort Study. JAMA Pediatr. 175, 817–826 (2021).
Kaletka, J., Lee, K. H., Altman, J., Kanada, M. & Hardy, J. W. Listeria monocytogenes infection alters the content and function of extracellular vesicles produced by trophoblast stem cells. Infect. Immun. 90, e0034722 (2022).
Ermini, L. et al. Fetal myocardial expression of GLUT1: roles of BPA exposure and cord blood exosomes in a rat model. Cells. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11203195 (2022).
Shepherd, M. C. et al. Extracellular vesicles from maternal uterine cells exposed to risk factors cause fetal inflammatory response. Cell Commun. Signal 19, 100 (2021).
Wang, Q. et al. ARMMs as a versatile platform for intracellular delivery of macromolecules. Nat. Commun. 9, 960 (2018).
Chen, Z., Qiao, Z., Wirth, C. R., Park, H. R. & Lu, Q. Arrestin domain-containing protein 1-mediated microvesicles (ARMMs) protect against cadmium-induced neurotoxicity. Extracell. Vesicle. 2, 100027 (2023).
Lu, J. et al. Rejuvenation of tendon stem/progenitor cells for functional tendon regeneration through platelet-derived exosomes loaded with recombinant Yap1. Acta Biomater. 161, 80–99 (2023).
Ge, L. et al. Engineered exosomes derived from miR-132-overexpresssing adipose stem cells promoted diabetic wound healing and skin reconstruction. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11, 1129538 (2023).
Cheng, W. et al. Engineered extracellular vesicles: a potential treatment for regeneration. iScience. 26, 108282 (2023).
Zou, X., Yuan, M., Zhang, T., Zheng, N. & Wu, Z. EVs containing host restriction factor IFITM3 inhibited ZIKV infection of fetuses in pregnant mice through trans-placenta delivery. Mol. Ther. 29, 176–190 (2021).
Gusar, V. et al. Non-invasive assessment of neurogenesis dysfunction in fetuses with early-onset growth restriction using fetal neuronal exosomes isolating from maternal blood: a pilot study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041497 (2025).
Kowal, J. et al. Proteomic comparison defines novel markers to characterize heterogeneous populations of extracellular vesicle subtypes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E968–E977 (2016).
Jeppesen, D. K. et al. Reassessment of exosome composition. Cell 177, 428–445 (2019).
Muralidharan-Chari, V. et al. ARF6-regulated shedding of tumor cell-derived plasma membrane microvesicles. Curr. Biol. 19, 1875–1885 (2009).
Hristov, M., Erl, W., Linder, S. & Weber, P. C. Apoptotic bodies from endothelial cells enhance the number and initiate the differentiation of human endothelial progenitor cells in vitro. Blood 104, 2761–2766 (2004).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the start-up fund from Chung-Ang University to H.P. and T32 ES007026-47 from the National Institutes of Health to E.L.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lewis, E., Lee, S.J. & Park, HR. Placenta-derived extracellular vesicles in fetal health: emerging insights into brain development and environmental interactions. Exp Mol Med 57, 2729–2738 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-025-01601-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-025-01601-2
