Introduction

Humans have had a close relationship with plants since the beginning of their existence. One scientific method to explore this relationship is through the identification of archaeobotanical remains, which provides insights into how people utilized, managed, and cultivated plants to meet their needs1. Among the various analytical methods developed for this purpose, starch granule analysis stands out. Starch is a long-chain compound formed by the polymerization of glucose molecules and is stored in the parenchyma of roots, stems, leaves, fruits, and seeds of plants as starch granules2. Different plant species have starch granules that exhibit distinct morphological characteristics3.

Numerous studies on starch granules have contributed valuable theoretical insights into the vitality patterns of ancient populations in China and the status of agricultural development. To date, over 150 case studies on starch granules have been reported across more than 130 prehistoric sites in China, focusing on materials such as pottery, lithics, mussels, dental calculus, and soils (Fig. 1). The most frequently discussed topics in these studies include the use of plants as food resources and the actual functions and usage patterns of various artifacts or tools, such as stone knives, grinding stones, pointed-bottom bottles, and grooved basins4,5,6,7,8. Additionally, starch granule analysis has been employed to investigate the domestication of plants9,10,11, food processing techniques12,13, and beverage production5,14,15,16.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Full size image

Prehistoric sites with starch granule studies published in China (The red box is the research area of this paper).

The Yangtze River valley is a crucial region for understanding the formation and development of Chinese civilization, with a long history of rice farming supported by archaeobotanical evidence. This has led some researchers to suggest that it may be one of the centers of rice cultivation. While many macro-plant remains have been reported from the area, studies focused on starch granules are relatively scarce. The Late Neolithic Fenghuangzui site, located in Xiangyang City of Hubei Province in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River valley, presents an opportunity to explore the potential and application of starch granule analysis in central China.

During the excavation conducted from 2020 to 2021, a hearth feature (referred to as H13) was uncovered in the southern part of the site, alongside numerous lithic artifacts, pottery, and plant and animal remains. This paper presents the findings from the recent analysis of starch granules extracted from the lithic artifacts found in H13. The goal is to identify the functions of these lithic tools and to investigate the formation process of H13. By categorizing and analyzing the types of starch granules recovered from the lithic tools, this study discusses how the inhabitants of Fenghuangzui may have utilized both wild and cultivated plants.

Methods

Archeological and environmental settings

The Fenghuangzui site, located at coordinates 111°59′20.39″ E and 32°14′42.67″ N, reaches a maximum elevation of 94 meters above sea level. It is situated between Yanying Village and Qianwang Village in Longwang Town, within the Xiangzhou District of Xiangyang City, Hubei Province, central China (Fig. 2). The site lies in the upper reaches of the Han River, near the southern edge of the Nanyang Basin. It primarily extends across an irregular platform, with a river flowing to the east and behind the platform17.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Full size image

Location of Fenghuangzui and other Late Neolithic sites in the middle Yangtze River.

Feature H13 was uncovered during the 2020 excavation. The feature has an oval shape, with well-defined walls and a nearly flat bottom. It measures 6.6 meters in length (long diameter) and 2.1 meters in width (short diameter), with a depth of 0.5 meters. The cultural deposits within H13 have been divided into two strata: upper and lower18.

The upper stratum, measuring up to 0.21 meters thick, consists of yellow-brown clay with a loose texture, mixed with red burnt clods and charcoal. Artifacts found in this layer include pottery, a few lithics, and animal bones. In contrast, the lower stratum ranges from 0.05 to 0.29 meters thick and contains gray-black soil with a loose texture, along with plant ash, charcoal, and some braised soil. Numerous sherds, lithics, and animal bones were excavated from this lower layer.

Four radiocarbon dating samples (see Table 1) from feature H13 indicate that it dates back to between 4400 and 4200 calibrated years before present (cal BP), placing it firmly within the Shijiahe Culture period18.

Table 1 Radiocarbon dating of H13

Evidence from plant remains, such as carbonized rice grains and rice husks, suggests that the subsistence economy during the Shijiahe Culture period was primarily based on rice farming. Additionally, fishing, hunting, and gathering wild plants contributed to the diet to varying1,19,20,21.

Recent archaeobotanical research has made significant advancements regarding the Qujialing and Shijiahe cultural sites in the Jianghan Plain and nearby regions (see Table 2 for a list of sites where archaeobotanical remains have been excavated and analyzed). These studies indicate that rice and millet agriculture played a crucial role in the local and regional diet of the Jianghan Plain, incorporating domesticated plants such as Setaria italica, Panicum miliaceum, Oryza sativa, and Glycine max. Additionally, various weeds were collected and cultivated, including Setaria viridis, Digitaria sanguinalis, Echinochloa Beauv, and Perilla frutescens, along with fruiting plants like Actinidia and Ampelopsis brevipedunculata, as well as nuts and drupe shells. The findings from macro-remain analysis strongly support these conclusions.

Table 2 The sites where archaeobotanical remains were unearthed and investigated

Moreover, plant microfossils have been vital for understanding the diverse methods of food procurement and consumption. Figure 1 illustrates the phytolith and starch granule analyses performed at the Chengtoushan site in Lixian, Hunan22, the Qujialing site in Jingmen, Hubei23,24, and the Gouwan site in Xichuan, Henan25. Phytolith analysis suggests that the Qujialing people began cultivating and utilizing rice approximately 5800 years ago, indicating advanced domestication of rice at that time. These discoveries provide a scientific foundation for understanding late Neolithic human life and rice domestication in the eastern part of the Hanshui River in the Jianghan Plain23.

Although starch granule analysis has significant potential to reveal food sources and provide insights into plants used for various purposes, including food processing, medicinal use, and crafting, it has been less frequently applied in Neolithic studies on the Jianghan Plain compared to other research methods. The present paper tentatively employs starch granule analysis on lithic artifacts from H13, aiming to enhance our understanding of the functions of these tools and to contribute new information about food exploitation and subsistence practices in the late Neolithic middle Yangtze River valley.

Materials and experiments

Twenty-four lithic specimens were excavated from H13, with five originating from the upper stratum and 19 from the lower stratum. Twenty-three of these specimens were included in the current study for starch granule analysis (Fig. 3). The analysis indicates that most artifacts from H13 are Chipped lithic artifacts, while Ground lithic artifacts are rare, represented only by a few stone chisels and ground flake. Chipped lithic artifacts include cores, flakes, tools, and fragments. The tools are core tools and flake tools. Considering the type and function of lithic artifacts, this study selected stone adze, and some tools for the extraction and analysis of starch granules. Figure 3 displays some of the lithic artifacts analyzed in this study.

Fig. 3: Main tools investigated in the present study.
Fig. 3: Main tools investigated in the present study.
Full size image

1. Stone Adze (H13:73); 2. Flake Tool 1 (H13:6); 3. Flake Tool 2 (H13:72); 4. Flake Tool 2 (H13:84); 5. Core Tool 1 (H13:3); 6. Core Tool 3 (H13:56); 7. Core Tool 2 (H13:18).

The extraction of starch granules was conducted at the archeological laboratories of Wuhan University and the Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, China. The extraction procedure followed methods outlined by Pearsall et al.26, Ying et al.27, Barton, Torrence and Fullagar et al.28,29,30. Sample collection involved inspecting the entire surface of each lithic artifact, without sectional sampling. Each specimen underwent three cleaning steps, referred to as Sediment 1, Sediment 2, and Sediment 3. First, the lithic was brushed to remove attached soil samples (Sediment 1); then it was washed with distilled water, and the collected liquid constituted wet wash samples (Sediment 2); finally, ultrasonic cleaning was applied, yielding ultrasound samples (Sediment 3). It was anticipated that the various sediments would reveal residues from different sources: Sediment 1 would contain more residues from the soil, and Sediment 3 would consist of materials closely associated with the specimen’s surface, and Sediment 2 would include mixed contents from both soil and lithic surfaces. The primary goal of wet cleaning was to separate Sediments 1 and 3 to minimize cross-contamination from soil to lithic surfaces. All three sediments were processed following the same laboratory protocols.

To prevent potential contamination, several measures were implemented before and after extraction:

  1. 1.

    Preservation: Excavated lithic artifacts were placed in sealed bags. Prior to sampling, these artifacts were stored in the warehouse of the Field Archaeological Base at the Fenghuangzui Site, Wuhan University.

  2. 2.

    Experiment protocol: During the experiments, all personnel wore lab clothes, masks, gloves, and other protective gear. All equipment used for sampling was disposable and thoroughly rinsed with pure water before use to eliminate contamination.

  3. 3.

    Decontamination: The topsoil sample served as a control for comparison with the ultrasonic sample.

The starch granule extraction process adhered to the methods detailed in Guan et al.27,31, encompassing the following steps: concentration, deflocculation, and heavy liquid flotation.

  1. (i)

    Concentration: A sample was filled with pure water until the liquid reached 50 ml in a test tube, which was then capped and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min. After centrifugation, the surface liquid was discarded, retaining approximately 5 ml at the bottom. This step aimed to concentrate the sample while removing some clay and impurities.

  2. (ii)

    Deflocculation: A 10 ml solution of Disodium EDTA (Na2EDTA) at a concentration of 0.1% was added to the sample, which was then shaken on a reciprocating shaker for over 2 h to detach starch granules from soil particles. Subsequently, pure water was added for cleaning, and the sample underwent centrifugation at 2500 rpm for 2 min, after which the surface liquid was discarded, retaining about 5 ml at the bottom. This process was repeated two more times to ensure the complete removal of Na2EDTA.

  3. (iii)

    Heavy liquid flotation: About 10 ml of heavy liquid (sodium polytungstate solution) with a density of 1.85 g/cm3 was added to the sample, which was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min. The surface liquid was then poured from the starch granules sample tube. This step was repeated to maximize starch granule recovery. Finally, the starch granule sample (SS) and the original sample (S) were washed by centrifugation in pure water to eliminate the heavy liquid.

  4. (iv)

    The starch granule sample (SS) was stored in a cool, dark place to prepare for observation. The slide was placed horizontally on a desk, and the observation sample number was recorded. A drop of 100% pure glycerin was added to the slide’s center to improve the consistency of the starch granule sample and minimize the fluidity of the liquid. A pipette gun was employed to extract the starch granule samples during the extraction procedure.

Starch granules were examined under a microscope at a magnification of ×200 and photographed at ×400 using an Olympus BX 53 microscope. During this microscopic observation, various morphological characteristics of the starch granules were recorded, including their integrity, shape, position of fissures, lamellae, location of the central hilum, state and shape of extinction crosses, visibility of umbilical points, and the overall contour of the starch granules.

Results

A total of 111 starch granules were extracted from 22 of the 23 lithic artifacts, of which 101 granules were morphologically identifiable in subsequent analyses (Fig. 4). Each starch granule collected from Sediment 3 (Sed 3) on stone tools was initially compared with modern starch granules. Details regarding the starch granules from stone tools are presented in Table 3.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Full size image

Main types of starch granules discovered in the residue sample (scale bar = 50 μm).

Table 3 Lithic samples and effective starch granules of tools from Fenghuangzui H13

The classification and identification of starch granules mainly rely on the method used by Guan Ying and Zhang Xi32,33,34. This method is mainly based on Geometric Morphometrics and Supporting Vector Machine (SVM) in Supervised Machine Learning. And the unknown starch granules are primarily based on the modern starch grain database established by the Archaeological Residue Research Group at the Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Given the possibility that starch residues from Sediment 2 (Sed 2) may have originated from both the soil and the lithic surfaces, they were excluded from further discussion in this study. It is also believed that Sed 1 has been influenced by taphonomic contamination at the site; thus, it serves as a control sample to eliminate contamination effects. We compared starch granules obtained from Sed 1 and Sed 3 for geometric morphological analysis. Using Canonical Variate Analysis (CVA), we observed a significant difference between the starch granules from Sed 1 and those from Sed 3 (p < 0.001), indicating distinct peaks (Fig. 5). This suggests that starch granules from Sed 3 were minimally affected by soil contamination during the deposition process, providing insight into the utilization of the sampled specimens.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Full size image

Frequency plots of canonical variables for Sed 1 and Sed 3.

CVA results

The CVA of starch granules in the soil (Sed 1) identified four significant canonical variates (Fig. 6). The eigenvalues indicate that canonical variate 1 (CV1) accounts for 66.3%, canonical variate 2 (CV2) for 22.1%, and canonical variate 3 (CV3) for 8.9%, altogether explaining 97.4% of the total variance. The CVA scatter plot shows that starch granules in the soil overlapped with three control groups, suggesting the presence of legumina types in the soil.

Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Full size image

Confidence ellipses (probability = 0.9) based on a canonical variate scatter plot of CV 1 and CV 2 for Sed 1 and Sed 3.

CVA of starch granules on lithic artifacts (Sed 3) identified six significant canonical variates (Fig. 6). The eigenvalues indicate that canonical variate 1 (CV1) accounts for 52.5%, CV2 for 25.2%, and CV3 for 11.0% of the total variables, collectively explaining 88.7% of the total variance. The CVA scatter plot shows that the starch granules on lithic artifacts overlapped with six control groups, indicating that these granules primarily came from underground storage organ types and legumina types.

SVM prediction

A Support Vector Machine (SVM) analysis was employed to examine and categorize starch granules. The prediction results from the SVM (Table 4) indicate potential sources for the starch granules found in H13 soil (Sed 1), with the analysis suggesting a higher likelihood of these granules originating from Dioscorea type, Maranta type, Cicer type, and Vicia type. In contrast, the starch granules identified on H13 lithic artifacts (Sed 3) are most likely associated with Amaranthus (root) type, Dioscorea type, Acorus type, Manihot type, Amorphophallus type, Saururus type, and Vigna type. However, it should be noted that these identifications represent probabilistic inferences rather than definitive determinations of plant species. To accurately identify the starch granules and eliminate soil contamination in Sed 3 samples, the SVM model results highlight plant taxa likely derived from soil sediments. The results indicate that Amaranthus (root) type, Dioscorea type, Acorus type, Manihot type, Amorphophallus type, and Saururus type may be considered positive taxa, with model accuracy greater than or equal to 92% (Table 4). It should be noticed that although the Amaranthus (root) type, Dioscorea type, and Manihot type appears in the prediction results of Sed 3, it does not necessarily indicate the existence of Amaranthus type, Dioscorea type and Manihot type, but rather a high degree of similarity between the starch granule morphologies of Amaranthus type, Dioscorea type and Manihot type and these starch granule samples. Therefore, it is necessary to exclude from the discussion the three plants of non-China origin, namely Amaranthus spinosus (root), Dioscorea alata and Manihot esculenta Crantz.

Table 4 Prediction results in Sed 1 and Sed 3

Discussions

Lithic artifacts serve as crucial carriers for studying the subsistence practices of prehistoric humans. Residues adhering to stone tool can reflect the ancient humans’ use of stone tools and various resources, as well as their livelihood patterns. Extracting and identifying starch granules from stone tools provides direct evidence of ancient tool usage, clarifies the specific functions and purposes of stone artifacts, and offers vital clues for researching the dietary structures of prehistoric populations.

By extracting and identifying the residues from stone tools excavated from H13 of Fenghuangzui Site, combined with the stone tool types, starch granules, and other remains discovered in the ash pit, we can not only gain insight into the specific ways the Fenghuangzui ancestors used stone tools and their utilization of plant food resources at the time, but also understand the formation and characteristics of H13.

Diverse food resources: Experimental results show that the starch granules on the surface of stone tools bear a high degree of similarity to those of root and tuber plants. The discovery of rhizome starch granules reflects the diversity of food sources of residents in the Fenghuangzui site.

Rhizome plants, including potatoes, yams, and taros, whose edible parts are roots or stems, refer to plants with abnormal underground tuberous parts to store nutrients. Rhizomes are typical edible plant resources that prehistoric people could find in the wild. Although these plant sources are rich in starch, their fragile nature makes them difficult to preserve, which contributes to their rarity in surface flotation collections. Additionally, these plants typically produce fewer phytoliths (according to Piperno)35, making it more likely for starch granules to be preserved and identified in archeological residue samples (as noted by Torrence)3.

In the early and middle stages of the Neolithic Age in China, and even in some areas during the Late Neolithic Age, the practice of gathering coexisted alongside agriculture, forming a crucial part of local livelihoods. The interplay between ecological resources and gathering practices in dietary patterns was shaped by temporal and regional ecological factors. The presence of starch granules from roots and tubers at multiple prehistoric sites across China suggests that these foods played an essential role in Neolithic diets (as documented by Li et al.36; Sun et al.7; Wan et al.37; Wu et al.38; Zhang et al.39; Zhao et al.40; Liu et al.)41.

In a word, our analysis of starch granules on the stone tools at the Fenghuangzui site indicates that the economic connotation of agriculture was extremely rich at that time, and wild plants such as tubers were indispensable food resources for the activities of the Fenghuangzui ancestors more than 4000 years ago.

Use of stone tools: Research shows that starch granules were found on several tools with cutting edges, including stone adze (H13:73), core tools (H13:3, H13:18, H13:56 and H13:83) and flake tools (H13:6 and H13:72). In further analysis, the starch granules in this group were identified as Acorus type, Amorphophallus type and Saururus type. We believe that people at that time primarily used these stone tools with cutting edges as the main use area to process the wild rhizome plants they obtained, such as harvesting, cutting, and processing Acorus tatarinowii, Amorphophallus paeoniifolius and Saururus chinensis.

Notably, no starch granules were found on the surface of the grinding stone fragment (H13:5). The extensive weathering of the lithic surface prevents the identification of the raw material type. Three possible explanations exist for the absence of starch granules: the lithic artifacts may have been unused; residues on the surface could have been destroyed during post-depositional processes; or the artifacts may have been used for non-plant materials.

Properties and formation of H13: It can be seen that there is only one lithic artifact (Core tool 1, H13:3) that was excavated from the upper stratum, while the rest were found in the lower stratum. The research shows that the upper stratum is yellowish brown soil, and most of the unearthed pottery is broken pottery pieces, with few stone tools and animal bones, and the relics are scattered and irregular. There are many complementary pottery unearthed in the lower stratum, and the distribution of these pottery has certain rules. There are also many animal bones and stone tools unearthed in the lower layer. Based on the study of pottery, stone tools and animals and plants, it can be concluded that the formation of H13 lower stratum is the result of multiple dietary activities by ancient people here, and the pottery, stone tools and animal bones used in each activity will be left in the pit, and the upper stratum should be formed after the ash pit was abandoned.

The study of starch granules on the lithic artifacts from the Fenghuangzui Site indicates the diversity of food resources among the residents at that time. In addition to rice and millet, they also collect local wild rhizome plants for consumption, and stone tools are used by them to cut and process these plants. Combined with other artifacts discovered from H13, such as pottery, animal bones, ash, and carbonized plant seeds, it can be concluded that the starch granules obtained from stone tools are related to the food preparation practices of Fenghuangzui residents in their daily lives. These stone tools were discarded in H13 after use. This conclusion helps to improve the understanding of paleobotany in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, and also provides important clues for understanding human life in the region more than 4000 years ago.