Table 2 Statistical comparison of restoration performance among CycleGAN, DDRM (binarization), and our proposed method on the The Pillow Book dataset with degradation intensity = 1.0
Method | PSNR ↑ | SSIM ↑ | LPIPS ↓ | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Min | Max | Mean | Var | Min | Max | Mean | Var | Min | Max | Mean | Var | |
CycleGAN | 12.35 | 20.39 | 17.16 | 1.3887 | 0.3894 | 0.9536 | 0.8369 | 0.0049 | 0.0160 | 0.4231 | 0.0893 | 0.0036 |
DDRM(Bin) | 8.96 | 18.34 | 13.86 | 2.7422 | 0.5176 | 0.8369 | 0.7440 | 0.0028 | 0.3711 | 0.7014 | 0.4877 | 0.0033 |
Ours | 19.20 | 27.60 | 24.83 | 1.2752 | 0.8384 | 0.8884 | 0.8736 | 0.0001 | 0.2498 | 0.4784 | 0.2789 | 0.0003 |