Table 4 Model performance on the SAA dataset was evaluated using mIoU (%)
Method | 1-way | 2-way | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | 1-shot | 5-shot | 1-shot | 5-shot | ||||||||
| Â | S0 | S1 | Avg | S0 | S1 | Avg | S0 | S1 | Avg | S0 | S1 | Avg |
ProtoNet41 | 55.11 | 60.72 | 57.91 | 72.96 | 68.38 | 70.67 | 44.31 | 38.10 | 41.20 | 55.68 | 46.49 | 51.08 |
AttProtoNet41 | 58.68 | 60.42 | 59.55 | 71.62 | 69.28 | 70.45 | 43.78 | 39.44 | 41.61 | 57.43 | 47.47 | 52.45 |
MPTI23 | 64.95 | 62.95 | 63.95 | 78.34 | 76.87 | 77.60 | 54.87 | 44.80 | 49.83 | 62.24 | 47.01 | 54.62 |
AttMPTI23 | 66.02 | 65.57 | 65.78 | 77.89 | 74.74 | 76.32 | 52.39 | 39.40 | 45.90 | 63.75 | 48.00 | 55.87 |
QGPA28 | 64.98 | 67.09 | 66.03 | 67.23 | 74.24 | 70.73 | 55.10 | 50.99 | 53.04 | 54.91 | 56.84 | 55.88 |
QGE29 | 69.17 | 59.24 | 64.20 | 69.98 | 58.74 | 64.36 | 48.59 | 35.40 | 41.99 | 40.25 | 36.98 | 38.61 |
DPA32 | 70.28 | 62.03 | 66.15 | 71.00 | 67.50 | 69.25 | 55.05 | 36.65 | 45.85 | 56.10 | 47.22 | 51.66 |
Ours | 75.37 | 69.45 | 72.41 | 82.50 | 78.58 | 80.54 | 57.73 | 51.27 | 54.50 | 67.13 | 57.71 | 62.42 |