Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Bariatric Surgery

Body weight-dependent and independent improvement in lipid metabolism after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in ApoE*3Leiden.CETP mice

Abstract

Background/Objectives

The incidence of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) has rapidly increased worldwide. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) achieves long-term weight loss and improves MetS-associated comorbidities. Using a mouse model with a humanized lipoprotein metabolism, we elucidated whether improvements in lipid and glucose metabolism after RYGB surgery are body weight loss-dependent or not.

Subjects/Methods

Male ApoE*3Leiden.CETP (ApoE3L.CETP) mice fed Western type diet for 6 weeks underwent RYGB or Sham surgery. Sham groups were either fed ad libitum or were body weight-matched (BWm) to the RYGB mice to discriminate surgical effects from body weight loss-associated effects. Before and after surgery, plasma was collected to assess the metabolic profile, and glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity were tested. Twenty days after surgery, mice were sacrificed, and liver was collected to assess metabolic, histological and global gene expression changes after surgery.

Results

RYGB induced a marked reduction in body weight, which was also achieved by severe food restriction in BWm mice, and total fat mass compared to Sham ad libitum mice (Sham AL). Total cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and ceramide were strongly reduced 20 days after surgery in RYGB compared to BWm mice. Glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity improved 13 days after surgery similarly in RYGB and BWm mice. Liver histology confirmed lipid reduction in RYGB and BWm mice while the transcriptomics data indicated altered genes expression in lipid metabolism.

Conclusions

RYGB surgery improves glucose metabolism and greatly ameliorates lipid metabolism in part in a body weight-dependent manner. Given that ApoE3L.CETP mice were extensively studied to describe the MetS, and given that RYGB improved ceramide after surgery, our data confirmed the usefulness of ApoE3L.CETP mice after RYGB in deciphering the metabolic improvements to treat the MetS.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gadde KM, Martin CK, Berthoud HR, Heymsfield SB. Obesity: pathophysiology and management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:69–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wali JA, Thomas HE, Sutherland AP. Linking obesity with type 2 diabetes: the role of T-bet. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014;7:331–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellentani S. The epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2017;37(Suppl 1):81–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bays HE, Toth PP, Kris-Etherton PM, Abate N, Aronne LJ, Brown WV, et al. Obesity, adiposity, and dyslipidemia: a consensus statement from the National Lipid Association. J Clin Lipidol. 2013;7:304–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Poirier P, Cornier MA, Mazzone T, Stiles S, Cummings S, Klein S, et al. Bariatric surgery and cardiovascular risk factors: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:1683–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Speliotes EK, Willer CJ, Berndt SI, Monda KL, Thorleifsson G, Jackson AU, et al. Association analyses of 249,796 individuals reveal 18 new loci associated with body mass index. Nat Genet. 2010;42:937–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang CY, Liao JK. A mouse model of diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;821:421–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kobayashi K, Forte TM, Taniguchi S, Ishida BY, Oka K, Chan L. The db/db mouse, a model for diabetic dyslipidemia: molecular characterization and effects of Western diet feeding. Metabolism. 2000;49:22–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yokoi N, Hoshino M, Hidaka S, Yoshida E, Beppu M, Hoshikawa R, et al. A novel rat model of type 2 diabetes: the Zucker fatty diabetes mellitus ZFDM rat. J Diabetes Res. 2013;2013:103731–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tarasco E, Pellegrini G, Whiting L, Lutz TA. Phenotypical heterogeneity in responder (R) and non-responder (NR) male ApoE*3Leiden.CETP mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018;315:G602–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Havekes L, de Wit E, Leuven JG, Klasen E, Utermann G, Weber W, et al. Apolipoprotein E3-Leiden. A new variant of human apolipoprotein E associated with familial type III hyperlipoproteinemia. Hum Genet. 1986;73:157–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van den Maagdenberg AM, Hofker MH, Krimpenfort PJ, de Bruijn I, van Vlijmen B, van der Boom H, et al. Transgenic mice carrying the apolipoprotein E3-Leiden gene exhibit hyperlipoproteinemia. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:10540–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Westerterp M, van der Hoogt CC, de Haan W, Offerman EH, Dallinga-Thie GM, Jukema JW, et al. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein decreases high-density lipoprotein and severely aggravates atherosclerosis in APOE*3-Leiden mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:2552–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van den Hoek AM, van der Hoorn JW, Maas AC, van den Hoogen RM, van Nieuwkoop A, Droog S, et al. APOE*3Leiden.CETP transgenic mice as model for pharmaceutical treatment of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16:537–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miras AD, le Roux CW. Surgery: the new gold-standard—medical gastric bypass. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14:257–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carswell KA, Belgaumkar AP, Amiel SA, Patel AG. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of gastric bypass surgery on plasma lipid levels. Obes Surg. 2016;26:843–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kraljevic M, Delko T, Kostler T, Osto E, Lutz T, Thommen S, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic mini gastric bypass in the treatment of obesity: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18:226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Guidone C, Iaconelli A, Leccesi L, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1577–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Caiazzo R, Lassailly G, Leteurtre E, Baud G, Verkindt H, Raverdy V, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus adjustable gastric banding to reduce nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 5-year controlled longitudinal study. Ann Surg. 2014;260:893–8. Discussion 898-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sjostrom L, Peltonen M, Jacobson P, Sjostrom CD, Karason K, Wedel H, et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2012;307:56–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Graessler J, Bornstein TD, Goel D, Bhalla VP, Lohmann T, Wolf T, et al. Lipidomic profiling before and after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in obese patients with diabetes. Pharmacogenomics J. 2014;14:201–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kayser BD, Lhomme M, Dao MC, Ichou F, Bouillot JL, Prifti E, et al. Serum lipidomics reveals early differential effects of gastric bypass compared with banding on phospholipids and sphingolipids independent of differences in weight loss. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017;41:917–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Borodzicz S, Czarzasta K, Kuch M, Cudnoch-Jedrzejewska A. Sphingolipids in cardiovascular diseases and metabolic disorders. Lipids Health Dis. 2015;14:55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang H, Kasumov T, Gatmaitan P, Heneghan HM, Kashyap SR, Schauer PR, et al. Gastric bypass surgery reduces plasma ceramide subspecies and improves insulin sensitivity in severely obese patients. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011;19:2235–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Paalvast Y, Gerding A, Wang Y, Bloks VW, van Dijk TH, Havinga R, et al. Male apoE*3-Leiden.CETP mice on high-fat high-cholesterol diet exhibit a biphasic dyslipidemic response, mimicking the changes in plasma lipids observed through life in men. Physiol Rep. 2017;5:e13376.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bruinsma BG, Uygun K, Yarmush ML, Saeidi N. Surgical models of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery and sleeve gastrectomy in rats and mice. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:495–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hao Z, Zhao Z, Berthoud HR, Ye J. Development and verification of a mouse model for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery with a small gastric pouch. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e52922.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hillebrand JJ, Langhans W, Geary N. Validation of computed tomographic estimates of intra-abdominal and subcutaneous adipose tissue in rats and mice. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18:848–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shackelford C, Long G, Wolf J, Okerberg C, Herbert R. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of nonneoplastic lesions in toxicology studies. Toxicol Pathol. 2002;30:93–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hao Z, Mumphrey MB, Townsend RL, Morrison CD, Munzberg H, Ye J, et al. Body composition, food intake, and energy expenditure in a murine model of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2173–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Osto E, Doytcheva P, Corteville C, Bueter M, Dorig C, Stivala S, et al. Rapid and body weight-independent improvement of endothelial and high-density lipoprotein function after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: role of glucagon-like peptide-1. Circulation. 2015;131:871–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hao Z, Townsend RL, Mumphrey MB, Morrison CD, Munzberg H, Berthoud HR. RYGB produces more sustained body weight loss and improvement of glycemic control compared with vsg in the diet-induced obese mouse model. Obes Surg. 2017;27:2424–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Pop LM, Mari A, Zhao TJ, Mitchell L, Burgess S, Li X, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared with equivalent diet restriction: mechanistic insights into diabetes remission. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:1710–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Marshall A, Santollo J, Corteville C, Lutz TA, Daniels D. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass does not affect daily water intake or the drinking response to dipsogenic stimuli in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2014;307:R114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Liou AP, Paziuk M, Luevano JM Jr., Machineni S, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. Conserved shifts in the gut microbiota due to gastric bypass reduce host weight and adiposity. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:178ra41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nestoridi E, Kvas S, Kucharczyk J, Stylopoulos N. Resting energy expenditure and energetic cost of feeding are augmented after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in obese mice. Endocrinology. 2012;153:2234–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pihlajamaki J, Gronlund S, Simonen M, Kakela P, Moilanen L, Paakkonen M, et al. Cholesterol absorption decreases after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass but not after gastric banding. Metabolism. 2010;59:866–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Carswell KA, Vincent RP, Belgaumkar AP, Sherwood RA, Amiel SA, Patel AG, et al. The effect of bariatric surgery on intestinal absorption and transit time. Obes Surg. 2014;24:796–805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kumar R, Lieske JC, Collazo-Clavell ML, Sarr MG, Olson ER, Vrtiska TJ, et al. Fat malabsorption and increased intestinal oxalate absorption are common after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surgery. 2011;149:654–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mu S, Liu J, Guo W, Zhang S, Xiao X, Wang Z, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass improves hepatic glucose metabolism involving down-regulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B in obese rats. Obes Facts. 2017;10:191–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Schauer PR, Burguera B, Ikramuddin S, Cottam D, Gourash W, Hamad G, et al. Effect of laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass on type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 2003;238:467–84. Discussion 84–5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Heneghan HM, Huang H, Kashyap SR, Gornik HL, McCullough AJ, Schauer PR, et al. Reduced cardiovascular risk after bariatric surgery is linked to plasma ceramides, apolipoprotein-B100, and ApoB100/A1 ratio. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:100–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Iqbal J, Walsh MT, Hammad SM, Hussain MM. Sphingolipids and lipoproteins in health and metabolic disorders. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2017;28:506–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Jiang XC, Paultre F, Pearson TA, Reed RG, Francis CK, Lin M, et al. Plasma sphingomyelin level as a risk factor for coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:2614–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Boini KM, Xia M, Koka S, Gehr TW, Li PL. Sphingolipids in obesity and related complications. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2017;22:96–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Alli V, Rogers AM. Gastric bypass and influence on improvement of NAFLD. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017;19:25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Verbeek J, Lannoo M, Pirinen E, Ryu D, Spincemaille P, Vander Elst I, et al. Roux-en-y gastric bypass attenuates hepatic mitochondrial dysfunction in mice with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Gut. 2015;64:673–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hassanian M, Al-Mulhim A, Al-Sabhan A, Al-Amro S, Bamehriz F, Abdo A, et al. The effect of bariatric surgeries on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:270–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Balistreri CR, Caruso C, Candore G. The role of adipose tissue and adipokines in obesity-related inflammatory diseases. Mediators Inflamm. 2010;2010:802078.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Miller GD, Nicklas BJ, Fernandez A. Serial changes in inflammatory biomarkers after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:618–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Pournaras DJ, Nygren J, Hagstrom-Toft E, Arner P, le Roux CW, Thorell A. Improved glucose metabolism after gastric bypass: evolution of the paradigm. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1457–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zuurbier CJ, Keijzers PJ, Koeman A, Van Wezel HB, Hollmann MW. Anesthesia’s effects on plasma glucose and insulin and cardiac hexokinase at similar hemodynamics and without major surgical stress in fed rats. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:135–42. Table of contents

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Windelov JA, Pedersen J, Holst JJ. Use of anesthesia dramatically alters the oral glucose tolerance and insulin secretion in C57Bl/6 mice. Physiol Rep. 2016;4:e12824.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hao Z, Munzberg H, Rezai-Zadeh K, Keenan M, Coulon D, Lu H, et al. Leptin deficient ob/ob mice and diet-induced obese mice responded differently to Roux-en-Y bypass surgery. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015;39:798–805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Jackness C, Karmally W, Febres G, Conwell IM, Ahmed L, Bessler M, et al. Very low-calorie diet mimics the early beneficial effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2013;62:3027–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Lutz TA, Bueter M. The use of rat and mouse models in bariatric surgery experiments. Front Nutr. 2016;3:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Berbee JF, Wong MC, Wang Y, van der Hoorn JW, Khedoe PP, van Klinken JB, et al. Resveratrol protects against atherosclerosis, but does not add to the antiatherogenic effect of atorvastatin, in APOE*3-Leiden.CETP mice. J Nutr Biochem. 2013;24:1423–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Prof. Arnold von Eckardstein from the Institute of Clinical Chemistry of the University of Zurich for his fruitful and expert discussions. We also thank RESOLVE EU-FP7 for generous funding and the Center for Clinical Studies (Vetsuisse Faculty) for kindly letting us use their equipment. We also thank Christelle le Foll for a critical revision of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the European Union (RESOLVE, FP7-HEALTH 305707; TAL and TH) and by the University of Zurich Forschungskredit (FK-17-061; ET).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas A. Lutz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tarasco, E., Boyle, C.N., Pellegrini, G. et al. Body weight-dependent and independent improvement in lipid metabolism after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in ApoE*3Leiden.CETP mice. Int J Obes 43, 2394–2406 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-019-0408-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-019-0408-y

Search

Quick links