Fig. 3: Modeled adjusted percent change and 95% CI for the association between drinking water PFAS detection and serum PFAS incorporating drinking water results from post-treatment samples only (participant n = 235), with participants whose public water system had no detections as the reference. | Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology

Fig. 3: Modeled adjusted percent change and 95% CI for the association between drinking water PFAS detection and serum PFAS incorporating drinking water results from post-treatment samples only (participant n = 235), with participants whose public water system had no detections as the reference.

From: Associations between PFAS in public water system drinking water and serum among Southern California adults

Fig. 3: Modeled adjusted percent change and 95% CI for the association between drinking water PFAS detection and serum PFAS incorporating drinking water results from post-treatment samples only (participant n = 235), with participants whose public water system had no detections as the reference.

∑5 PFAS includes PFHxS, PFOA, PFOS, PFDeA, and PFNA. Due to one participant missing serum PFOS results and one water system missing PFDeA results, the PFOS model includes 234 participants and the ∑5 PFAS model includes 227 participants. Multivariable linear regression models were run separately for each analyte and adjusted for age, sex, parity, race/ethnicity, education, income, and nativity.

Back to article page