Table 3 NO2 and PM2.5 exposure distributions (µg/m3) for the Dutch and Swiss tracking campaign for residential (RES), ABM simulated workplace (ABM) and tracking (GPS) exposures and additionally for a subset of participants with known workplace (ABMkWP).

From: Comparison of residential and mobility-integrated air pollution exposures from tracking campaigns and agent-based modelling in Switzerland and the Netherlands

  

n

mean

SD

per25

median

per75

IQR

The Netherlands

NO2

RES

167

25.47

4.70

23.01

24.86

28.94

5.93

ABM

167

25.02

3.91

23.04

24.86

27.97

4.93

GPS

167

25.57

4.43

23.40

25.37

28.31

4.91

ABMkWP (subset)

89

26.18

3.39

23.79

26.36

28.77

4.99

PM2.5

RES

167

12.93

0.48

12.78

13.05

13.16

0.38

ABM

167

12.86

0.43

12.76

12.97

13.07

0.32

GPS

167

12.64

0.51

12.40

12.72

12.95

0.55

ABMkWP (subset)

89

12.98

0.38

12.87

13.05

13.16

0.30

Switzerland

NO2

RES

408

22.25

9.20

14.68

20.89

28.62

13.94

ABM

408

21.65

7.46

15.93

20.76

26.96

11.03

GPS

408

23.39

7.16

17.66

23.06

28.24

10.59

ABMkWP (subset)

268

23.91

7.20

18.32

23.44

29.27

10.95

PM2.5

RES

322

15.05

2.72

13.07

14.68

16.54

3.47

ABM

322

14.86

2.29

13.26

14.64

15.97

2.72

GPS

322

14.74

2.13

13.24

14.49

15.88

2.64

ABMkWP (subset)

201

15.13

2.06

13.73

14.85

16.40

2.68

  1. n number of participants, SD standard deviation, per25 25th percentile, per75 75th percentile, IQR inter quartile range.
Back to article page