Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Specificity of International Classification of Diseases codes for bronchopulmonary dysplasia: an investigation using electronic health record data and a large insurance database

Abstract

Objective

International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes in electronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly used for health services research, in spite of unknown diagnostic accuracy. The accuracy of ICD codes to identify bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is unknown.

Study design

Retrospective cohort study in a single-center NICU (n = 166) to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10 codes for the diagnosis of BPD. Analysis of large insurance claims database (n = 7887) to determine date of assignment of the code.

Results

The sensitivity of any BPD-related ICD codes ranged from 0.82 to 0.95, while the specificity ranged from 0.25 to 0.36. In a large national insurance database, the most common date of ICD-9 or ICD-10 code assignment was the day of birth, which is inconsistent with the clinical definition.

Conclusions

ICD codes registered for BPD are unlikely to accurately reflect the current clinical definition and should be interpreted with caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Day of life ICD code assigned.
Fig. 2: Day of life ICD code assigned.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ducharme R, Benchimol EI, Deeks SL, Hawken S, Fergusson DA, Wilson K. Validation of diagnostic codes for intussusception and quantification of childhood intussusception incidence in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. J Pediatr. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.05.034.

  2. Myers RP, Leung Y, Shahee AAM, Li B. Validation of ICD-9-CM/ICD-10 coding algorithms for the identification of patients with acetaminophen overdose and hepatotoxicity using administrative data. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:159.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fleet JL, Dixon SN, Shariff SZ, Quinn RR, Nash DM, Harel Z, et al. Detecting chronic kidney disease in population-based administrative databases using an algorithm of hospital encounter and physician claim codes. BMC Nephrol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-14-81.

  4. Thygesen SK, Christiansen CF, Christensen S, Lash TL, Sørensen HT. The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-83.

  5. National Center for Health Statistics. Public health transition to ICD-10-CM/PCS. Classification of dieseases, functioning, and disability. National Center for Health Statistics. 2015. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd10cm_pcs.htm.

  6. Beam AL, Fried I, Palmer N, Agniel D, Brat G, Fox K, et al. Estimates of healthcare spending for preterm and low-birthweight infants in a commercially insured population: 2008-2016. J Perinatol. 2020;40:1091–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-0635-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fried I, Beam AL, Kohane IS, Palmer NP. Utilization, cost, and outcome of branded vs compounded 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate in prevention of preterm birth. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5017.

  8. Grosse SD, Waitzman NJ, Yang N, Abe K, Barfield WD. Employer-sponsored plan expenditures for infants orn preterm. Pediatrics. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1078.

  9. Juhl SM, Hansen ML, Fonnest G, Gormsen M, Lambæk ID, Greisen G. Poor validity of the routine diagnosis of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants at discharge. Acta Paediatr. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13541.

  10. Agniel D, Kohane IS, Weber GM. Biases in electronic health record data due to processes within the healthcare system: retrospective observational study. BMJ. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1479.

  11. Pallatto E, Hunt P, Reber K, Evans J, Padula M. Topics in neonatal informatics: standardizing diagnoses in neonatology: bronchopulmonary dysplasia and beyond. Neoreviews. 2012;13:e577–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beam AL, Kohane IS. Big data and machine learning in health care. JAMA. 2018;319:1317 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.18391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Shankaran S, Laptook A, Walsh M, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2010;126:443–56. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lapcharoensap W, Lee HC, Nyberg A, Dukhovny D. Health care and societal costs of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Neoreviews. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.19-4-e211.

  15. Lefkowitz W, Rosenberg SH. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: pathway from disease to long-term outcome. J Perinatol. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Parad RB, Davis JM, Lo J, Thomas M, Marlow N, Calvert S, et al. Prediction of respiratory outcome in extremely low gestational age infants. Neonatology. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1159/000369878.

  17. Northway WH, Rosan RC, Porter DY. Pulmonary disease following respirator therapy of hyaline-membrane disease. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 1967. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196702162760701.

  18. Jensen EA, Dysart K, Gantz MG, McDonald S, Bamat N, Keszler M, et al. The diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants. an evidence-based approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200:751–9. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201812-2348OC.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Beam KS, Aliaga S, Ahlfeld SK, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Smith PB, Laughon MM. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants. J Perinatol. 2014;34:705–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Higgins RD, Jobe AH, Koso-Thomas M, Bancalari E, Viscardi R, Hartert T, et al. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: executive summary of a workshop. J Pediatr. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.01.043.

  21. Member Map and Member List. Vermont Oxford Network, 1 January 2019. https://public.vtoxford.org/member-map/.

  22. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.

  23. Ehrenkranz RA. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Consensus definition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1353–60. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-0249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Quan H, Li B, Duncan Saunders L, Parson G, Nillson C, Alibhai A, et al. Assessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually coded database. Health Serv Res. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00822.x.

  25. Reeves SL, Madden B, Wu M, Miller L, Anders D, Caggana M, et al. Performance of ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for identifying children with Sickle Cell Anemia. Health Serv Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13257.

  26. Landry JS, Croitoru D, Menzies D. Validation of ICD-9 diagnostic codes for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in Quebec’s provincial health care databases. Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2012;33:47–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Malley KJ, Cook KF, Price MD, Wildes KR, Hurdle JF, Ashton CM. Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy. Health Serv Res. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00444.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Kathe Fox and Dr. John Zupancic for their helpful comments on a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

KSB was supported by AHRQ grant number T32HS000063 as part of the Harvard-wide Pediatric Health Services Research Fellowship Program. AB was supported by a grant from the NIH NHLBI (award #: 7K01HL141771–02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KSB conceived of the project, analyzed the single-institution data, performed chart review, and contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. ML analyzed the insurance data and contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. KH created the single-institution cohort and collected the respiratory data. AB conceived of the project, provided input on the statistical analysis, and helped draft the manuscript. RBP conceived of the project and contributed the drafting of the manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristyn S. Beam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beam, K.S., Lee, M., Hirst, K. et al. Specificity of International Classification of Diseases codes for bronchopulmonary dysplasia: an investigation using electronic health record data and a large insurance database. J Perinatol 41, 764–771 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-00965-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-00965-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links