Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Development of a small baby unit to improve outcomes for the extremely premature infant

Abstract

Survival and outcomes for extremely premature (EP) infants have improved and even infants born at 23 and 24 weeks that were previously considered non-viable are now routinely surviving. This review describes our particular institution’s basis for and process of creating and sustaining a small baby program for a quaternary, referral-based neonatal intensive care unit. Through multi-disciplinary collaboration, small baby guidelines were developed that established uniform care and optimized evidence-based practice for the care of this unique patient population. A focus on parent-centered care while removing noxious stimuli for the patient has improved neurodevelopmental outcomes. Data collection, quality improvement, and ongoing research are incorporated in the small baby program to establish and sustain best practices and outcomes for the EP patient. Through the establishment of a small baby unit, we have improved survival, decreased short-term morbidities, and improved neurodevelopmental outcomes for the EP infant in our region.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Mortality of ELBW infants transferred to NCH from 2004 to 2017 decreased from 30% to ~10%.
Fig. 2: Early successes of the Small Baby Program after implementing standardized guidelines.
Fig. 3: Prophylactic indomethacin associated with reduced mortality in Small Baby Program patients during different time epochs.
Fig. 4: Small Baby Publications and Research Efforts.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norman M, et al. Association between year of birth and 1-year survival among extremely preterm infants in Sweden during 2004–2007 and 2014–2016. JAMA. 2019;321:1188–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stoll BJ, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD neonatal research network. Pediatrics. 2010;126:443–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Backes CH, et al. A proactive approach to neonates born at 23 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:939–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Backes CH, et al. Outcomes following a comprehensive versus a selective approach for infants born at 22 weeks of gestation. J Perinatol. 2019;39:39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brilli RJ, et al. The preventable harm index: an effective motivator to facilitate the drive to zero. J Pediatr. 2010;157:681–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Doerfler ME, et al. Methods for reducing sepsis mortality in emergency departments and inpatient units. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015;41:205–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. James D, Pennardt AM. Trauma care principles. StatPearls. 2020. Treasure Island, FL.

  8. Nankervis CA, et al. Implementation of a multidisciplinary guideline-driven approach to the care of the extremely premature infant improved hospital outcomes. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:188–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shah PS, et al. Neonatal outcomes of very low birth weight and very preterm neonates: an international comparison. J Pediatr. 2016;177:144–52. e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith LK, et al., An international comparison of death classification at 22 to 25 weeks’ gestational age. Pediatrics, 2018;142.

  11. Schneider K, et al. End-of-life decisions 20 years after EURONIC: neonatologists’ self-reported practices, attitudes, and treatment choices in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. J Pediatr. 2019;207:154–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Merritt TA, Gold M, Holland J. A critical evaluation of clinical practice guidelines in neonatal medicine: does their use improve quality and lower costs?. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999;5:169–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boundy EO, et al. Kangaroo Mother Care and Neonatal Outcomes: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016;137:e20152238. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2238.

  14. Nyqvist KH. et al. Towards universal Kangaroo mother care: recommendations and report from the first European conference and seventh international workshop on Kangaroo mother care. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:820–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gonya J, et al. Empowerment programme for parents of extremely premature infants significantly reduced length of stay and readmission rates. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103:727–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ment LR, et al. Low-dose indomethacin and prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage: a multicenter randomized trial. Pediatrics. 1994;93:543–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelin TD, et al. Outcomes following indomethacin prophylaxis in extremely preterm infants in an all-referral NICU. J Perinatol. 2017;37:932–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pishevar N, et al. Predicting survival in infants born at <27 weeks gestation admitted to an all referral neonatal intensive care unit: a pilot study. J Perinatol. 2020;40:750–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ezenwa B, et al. Effects of practice change on outcomes of extremely preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus. Acta Paediatr. 2019;108:88–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Robbins M, et al. Early extubation attempts reduce length of stay in extremely preterm infants even if re-intubation is necessary. J Neonatal Perinat Med. 2015;8:91–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moorehead PA, et al. Factors associated with survival of <27 week infants in an all-referral neonatal intensive care unit. J Neonatal Perinat Med. 2012;5:105–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Trittmann JK, Nelin LD, Klebanoff MA. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely preterm neonates. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172:1173–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Coccia C, et al. Management of extremely low-birth-weight infants. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1992;382:10–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kastenberg ZJ, et al. Effect of deregionalized care on mortality in very low-birth-weight infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Callaghan N, Dee A, Philip RK. Evidence-based design for neonatal units: a systematic review. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2019;5:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pineda RG, et al. Alterations in brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants hospitalized in different neonatal intensive care unit environments. J Pediatr. 2014;164:52–60. e2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gonya J, et al. Human interaction in the NICU and its association with outcomes on the brief infant-toddler social and emotional assessment (BITSEA). Early Hum Dev. 2018;127:6–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Erdei C, et al. The growth and development unit. A proposed approach for enhancing infant neurodevelopment and family-centered care in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol. 2019;39:1684–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cong X, et al. The impact of cumulative pain/stress on neurobehavioral development of preterm infants in the NICU. Early Hum Dev. 2017;108:9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all of the providers from the various disciplines that have coalesced around a unifying goal of improving outcomes in our most vulnerable patients. From its inception to today, the growth and success of the Small Baby Program at Nationwide Children’s Hospital would not be possible without such a selfless and collaborative effort. Furthermore, we want to recognize and thank all our patients and their families, from whom we learn every day.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina M. Reber.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

OF, LDN, and EGS have no conflicts of interest to declare. KMR is a Board Member of the Children’s Hospital Neonatal Consortium and receives financial compensation in this role.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fathi, O., Nelin, L.D., Shepherd, E.G. et al. Development of a small baby unit to improve outcomes for the extremely premature infant. J Perinatol 42, 157–164 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-00984-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-00984-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links