Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Quality Improvement Article
  • Published:

The NICU tracheostomy team: multidisciplinary collaboration for improvement in survival of complex patients

Abstract

Objective

Evaluate feasibility and impact of “Tracheostomy Team” on survival and length of stay (LOS) at a level IV NICU.

Methods

Plan-do-study-act cycles targeted five Global Tracheostomy Collaborative “key drivers”. From January 2017 to December 2022 multidisciplinary, bimonthly bedside rounds were conducted.

Results

After 3 cycles, in-hospital survival among 39 patients with tracheostomy improved and sustained from 67% to 100% (baseline 18/27; 66.7%; QI 35/39, 89.7%; p = 0.03). Median LOS (days [IQR]) did not significantly differ between baseline and QI (237 [57–308] vs. 217 [130–311]; p = 0.9). Among patients with BPD, median LOS was higher after QI interventions (baseline 248 [222–308] vs. QI 332.5 [283.5–392]; p = .02). Special cause variation resulted from peak increase in LOS during the COVID19 pandemic (2021). Tracheitis/pneumonia was treated significantly more frequently in QI BPD patients.

Conclusion

Multidisciplinary approach is feasible, resulting in improved survival without a sustained increase in LOS. Future QI efforts should address post-operative infectious complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Key driver diagram.
Fig. 2: Control chart for survival to hospital discharge.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muller RG, Mamidala MP, Smith SH, Smith A, Sheyn A. Incidence, epidemiology, and outcomes of pediatric tracheostomy in the United States from 2000 to 2012. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;160:332–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Overman AE, Liu M, Kurachek SC, Shreve MR, Maynard RC, Mammel MC, et al. Tracheostomy for infants requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: 10 years’ experience. Pediatrics. 2013;131:1491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahida JB, Asti L, Boss EF, Shah RK, Deans KJ, Minneci PC, et al. Tracheostomy placement in children younger than 2 years: 30-day outcomes using the national surgical quality improvement program pediatric. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142:241–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang CS, Kou Y, Shah GB, Mitchell RB, Johnson RF. Tracheostomy in extremely preterm neonates in the United States: a cross-sectional analysis. Laryngoscope. 2020;130:2056–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Donda K, Agyemang CO, Adjetey NA, Agyekum A, Princewill N, Ayensu M, et al. Tracheostomy trends in preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the United States: 2008–2017. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021;56:1008–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DeMauro SB, D’Agostino JA, Bann C, Bernbaum J, Gerdes M, Bell EF, et al. Developmental outcomes of very preterm infants with tracheostomies. J Pediatr. 2014;164:1303–10.e2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. McGrath BA, Thomas AN. Patient safety incidents associated with tracheostomies occurring in hospital wards: a review of reports to the UK national patient safety agency. Postgrad Med J. 2010;86:522–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brenner MJ, Pandian V, Milliren CE, Graham DA, Zaga C, Morris LL, et al. Global tracheostomy collaborative: Data-driven improvements in patient safety through multidisciplinary teamwork, standardization, education, and patient partnership. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:e104–e118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abode KA, Drake AF, Zdanski CJ, Retsch-Bogart GZ, Gee AB, Noah TL. A multidisciplinary children’s airway center: Impact on the care of patients with tracheostomy. Pediatrics. 2016;137:e20150455–0455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baker CD, Martin S, Thrasher J, Moore HM, Baker J, Abman SH, et al. A standardized discharge process decreases length of stay for ventilator-dependent children. Pediatrics. 2016;137:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0637.

  11. Gien J, Kinsella J, Thrasher J, Grenolds A, Abman SH, Baker CD. Retrospective analysis of an interdisciplinary ventilator care program intervention on survival of infants with ventilator-dependent bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34:155–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abman SH, Collaco JM, Shepherd EG, Keszler M, Cuevas-Guaman M, Welty SE, et al. Interdisciplinary care of children with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Pediatr. 2017;181:12–28.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Agarwal A, Marks N, Wessel V, Willis D, Bai S, Tang X, et al. Improving knowledge, technical skills, and confidence among pediatric health care providers in the management of chronic tracheostomy using a simulation model. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:696–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wooldridge AL, Carter KF. Pediatric and neonatal tracheostomy caregiver education with phased simulation to increase competency and enhance coping. J Pediatr Nurs. 2021;60:247–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thrasher J, Baker J, Ventre KM, Martin SE, Dawson J, Cox R, et al. Hospital to home: a quality improvement initiative to implement high-fidelity simulation training for caregivers of children requiring long-term mechanical ventilation. J Pediatr Nurs. 2018;38:114–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prickett K, Deshpande A, Paschal H, Simon D, Hebbar KB. simulation-based education to improve emergency management skills in caregivers of tracheostomy patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;120:157–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stark AR, Pursley DM, Papile LA, Eichenwald EC, Hankins CT, Buck RK, et al. Standards for levels of neonatal care: II, III, and IV. Pediatrics. 2023;151:e2023061957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1723–9. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2011060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bell EF, Hintz SR, Hansen NI, Bann CM, Wyckoff MH, DeMauro SB, et al. Mortality, in-hospital morbidity, care practices, and 2-year outcomes for extremely preterm infants in the US, 2013-2018. JAMA. 2022;327:248–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jensen EA, Edwards EM, Greenberg LT, Soll RF, Ehret DEY, Horbar JD. Severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia among very preterm infants in the United States. Pediatrics. 2021;148:e2020030007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cristea AI, Carroll AE, Davis SD, Swigonski NL, Ackerman VL. Outcomes of children with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia who were ventilator dependent at home. Pediatrics. 2013;132:727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mandy G, Malkar M, Welty SE, Brown R, Shepherd E, Gardner W, et al. Tracheostomy placement in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Safety and outcomes. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2013;48:245–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Upadhyay K, Vallarino DA, Talati AJ. Outcomes of neonates with tracheostomy secondary to bronchopulmonary dysplasia. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20:414.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yallapragada S, Savani RC, Mūnoz-Blanco S, Lagatta JM, Truog WE, Machry J, et al. Qualitative indications for tracheostomy and chronic mechanical ventilation in patients with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Perinatol. 2021;41:2651–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Akangire G, Taylor JB, McAnany S, Noel-MacDonnell J, Lachica C, Sampath V, et al. Respiratory, growth, and survival outcomes of infants with tracheostomy and ventilator dependence. Pediatr Res. 2021;90:381–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Murthy K, Porta NFM, Lagatta JM, Zaniletti I, Truog WE, Grover TR, et al. Inter-center variation in death or tracheostomy placement in infants with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Perinatol. 2017;37:723–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Murthy K, Savani RC, Lagatta JM, Zaniletti I, Wadhawan R, Truog W, et al. Predicting death or tracheostomy placement in infants with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Perinatol. 2014;34:543–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Luo J, Shepard S, Nilan K, Wood A, Monk HM, Jensen EA, et al. Improved growth and developmental activity post tracheostomy in preterm infants with severe BPD. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018;53:1237–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kou Y, Chorney SR, Johnson RF. Multidisciplinary pediatric tracheostomy teams. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2022;55:1195–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Crosbie R, Cairney J, Calder N. The tracheostomy clinical nurse specialist: an essential member of the multidisciplinary team. J Laryngol Otol. 2014;128:171–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Richardson J, Girardot K, Powers J, Kadenko-Monirian M. Clinical nurse specialist tracheostomy management improves patient outcomes. J Nurs Care Qual. 2023;38:251–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Drs. Kathleen Wasylik and Dr. Rose Trowbridge (Pediatric Ear Nose and Throat Specialists) for their support and participation in Tracheostomy Team rounds and the Johns Hopkins All Children’s Foundation for financial support to the GTC and provision of patient home equipment not covered by insurance (car seat, double stroller, and emergency tracheostomy bag)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Joana Silva Machry (first author): project inception, design; data acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data, manuscript draft, manuscript review, final approval of submitted manuscript, and responsible for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Julia Krzyzewski: project inception, design; data acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data, manuscript review. Courtney Ward, Gretchen Thompson: project design, data acquisition, manuscript review. Deanna Green, Aaron Germain, Caren Smith, Beatriz Teppa, John Morrison, Nicholas Jabre, Fauzia Shakeel, Danilo Escoto, Angela Green (senior author): manuscript review. Amy Ashburn, Allison Fernandez, Kathy Renn: project design, manuscript review. Dina Ashour, Jamie L Fierstein, Misti Moore, Grace Freire: data analysis, manuscript review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joana Silva Machry.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Machry, J.S., Krzyzewski, J., Ward, C. et al. The NICU tracheostomy team: multidisciplinary collaboration for improvement in survival of complex patients. J Perinatol 44, 1854–1862 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02034-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02034-x

Search

Quick links