Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Yes, it is time for a separate residency “Neonatal Critical Care Medicine”: the European Society for Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care supports the proposal

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Lakshminrusimha S, Steinhorn RH. Is it time for a separate residency and department in “Neonatal Critical Care Medicine”?. J Perinatol. 2025;45:867–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02219-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Luca D, Modi N, Davis P, Kusuda S, de Wildt SN, Keszler M, et al. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health Commission on the future of neonatology. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2025;9:578–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(25)00106-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schaffer AJ. Diseases of the newborn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1960.

  4. Sanchez-Luna M, Raimondi F, De Luca D. Neonatal professorships in Europe: insufficient to protect the tiniest and frailest. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025;50:101224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101224.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DDL conceived the letter and write the first draft; MSL analysed the European situation data and the literature and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content; FR analysed the European situation data and the literature and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content; AD analysed the the literature and gave the PICU experience and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content; AH analysed the literature and gave the PICU experience and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content; ASR analysed the European situation data and the literature and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content; KS analysed the European situation data and the literature and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content; all authors agreed to make this an ESPNIC position and approved the final article version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele De Luca.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Luca, D., Sanchez-Luna, M., Raimondi, F. et al. Yes, it is time for a separate residency “Neonatal Critical Care Medicine”: the European Society for Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care supports the proposal. J Perinatol 46, 326–327 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02502-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02502-y

Search

Quick links