Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Infectious medicine, virology

Frequency of infections in 948 MPN patients: a prospective multicenter patient-reported pilot study

A Correction to this article was published on 10 July 2020

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Change history

References

  1. Lussana F, Cattaneo M, Rambaldi A, Squizzato A. Ruxolitinib-associated infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:339–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hultcrantz M, Wilkes SR, Kristinsson SY, Andersson TM, Derolf AR, Eloranta S, et al. Risk and cause of death in patients diagnosed with myeloproliferative neoplasms in Sweden Between 1973 and 2005: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2288–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Landtblom AR, Andersson TML, Dickman PW, Smedby KE, Eloranta S, Batyrbekova N, et al. Risk of infections in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms - a population-based cohort study of 8363 patients. Leukemia. 2020. (In press).

  4. Perner F, Schnoder TM, Ranjan S, Wolleschak D, Ebert C, Pils MC, et al. Specificity of JAK-kinase inhibition determines impact on human and murine T-cell function. Leukemia. 2016;30:991–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kleppe M, Koche R, Zou L, van Galen P, Hill CE, Dong L, et al. Dual targeting of oncogenic activation and inflammatory signaling increases therapeutic efficacy in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:29–43 e7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleppe M, Kwak M, Koppikar P, Riester M, Keller M, Bastian L, et al. JAK-STAT pathway activation in malignant and nonmalignant cells contributes to MPN pathogenesis and therapeutic response. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:316–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jentsch-Ullrich K, Eberhardt J, Zeremski V, Koehler M, Wolleschak D, Heidel FH. Characteristics and treatment of polycythemia vera patients in clinical practice: a multicenter chart review on 1476 individuals in Germany. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142:2041–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Polverelli N, Palumbo GA, Binotto G, Abruzzese E, Benevolo G, Bergamaschi M, et al. Epidemiology, outcome, and risk factors for infectious complications in myelofibrosis patients receiving ruxolitinib: a multicenter study on 446 patients. Hematol Oncol. 2018, PMID: 29624703. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2509 [Online ahead of print].

  9. Impfkommission Sn. Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) am Robert Koch-Institut. Epid Bull. 2019:313–64.

  10. Barbui T, Tefferi A, Vannucchi AM, Passamonti F, Silver RT, Hoffman R, et al. Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. Leukemia. 2018;32:1057–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. European Medicines Agency (EMA) CfMPfHUC. Asessment report: Jakavi. EMA; 2015. EMA/139813/2015.

  12. Heine A, Brossart P, Wolf D. Ruxolitinib is a potent immunosuppressive compound: is it time for anti-infective prophylaxis? Blood. 2013;122:3843–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Parampalli Yajnanarayana S, Stubig T, Cornez I, Alchalby H, Schonberg K, Rudolph J, et al. JAK1/2 inhibition impairs T cell function in vitro and in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Br J Haematol. 2015;169:824–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Open access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CCC, FP, AH, MvLT, and FHH developed the study protocol and questionnaire. CCC and VH analyzed the data. FP, KJU, DK, MG, SK, KD, PJJ, DW, SI, FS, TR, GA, SJ, PE, and FHH collected and analyzed the data. FHH wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian H. Heidel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

FHH: research funding: Novartis, Celgene, CTI; consultant for Novartis, Celgene, AOP and CTI. AH: research support: Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Incyte. PJJ: advisory role, received honoraria, research funding, and/or travel/accommodation expenses from: Abbvie, Incyte, Bayer, Boehringer, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, BMS and Celgene. MvLT: research funding: Celgene, Novartis, Gilead; honoraria and consultancy: Celgene, Janssen, Medac, Gilead, BMS, Oncopeptides, Takeda.

Ethical standards

The questionnaire and study protocol were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Jena University Hospital (Protocol #2018-1198-Reg).

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crodel, C.C., Jentsch-Ullrich, K., Koschmieder, S. et al. Frequency of infections in 948 MPN patients: a prospective multicenter patient-reported pilot study. Leukemia 34, 1949–1953 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0890-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0890-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links