To the Editor:
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is now a standard of care for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) with two approved drug products (i.e., idecabtagene vicleucel [ide-cel], ciltacabtagene autoleucel [cilta-cel]) [1,2,3,4,5]. Treatment with BCMA CAR-T in MM patients is characterized by rapid response kinetics, with a median time to first response and complete response (CR) of 1 and 3 months, respectively [1,2,3,4,5]. Patients who achieve a CR as the best overall response to BCMA CAR-T have significantly longer PFS [1,2,3,4,5], but these analyses are limited by immortal time bias and the prognostic significance of early categorical response attainment at specific landmark time points is unclear.
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computer tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly being used in MM patients treated with BCMA CAR-T. The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) also recently incorporated PET/CT into the revised response criteria for minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity [6]. Several prospective studies have demonstrated that PET/CT negativity is associated with prolonged survival in newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible MM patients treated with triplet therapy +/− autologous stem cell transplantation [7,8,9]. However, prospective data validating PET/CT in relapsed and refractory MM patients treated with BCMA CAR-T is limited to a phase 2 clinical trial (n = 63) [10]. Zugasti and colleagues showed that PET/CT negativity at day 100 was associated with longer overall survival (OS) after treatment with ARI0002h, an academic BCMA CAR-T [10]. We sought to investigate further the prognostic impact of early serologic and PET/CT response attainment in MM patients treated with BCMA CAR-T.
We performed a retrospective study that included all MM patients consecutively treated with BCMA CAR-T at the Massachusetts General Hospital between 2016 and 2024. Serological responses were graded according to the IMWG response criteria [6]. Early treatment responses were defined as a ≥VGPR at 1 month and CR at 3 months based on the published response kinetics with ide-cel and cilta-cel [1,2,3,4,5]. PET/CT was available in a subset of patients with pre-treatment and re-staging scans. Re-staging scans were obtained at the discretion of the treating investigator, and the same group of expert nuclear medicine radiologists interpreted all the scans. Two definitions for PET/CT negativity were evaluated based on the evolving imaging response criteria in MM patients: (1) Deauville score (DS) < 3 (current criteria); and (2) DS < 4 (proposed criteria) [6, 9]. Additional details regarding the statistical analysis are included in the Supplemental Methods. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Massachusetts General Hospital (15-190). All methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all patients provided informed consent per institutional guidelines.
A total of 158 patients with relapsed and refractory MM were included. Baseline patient characteristics before treatment with BCMA CAR-T are shown in Supplementary Table 1. One hundred thirteen patients (72%) had penta-exposed disease, 73 (46%) had revised high-risk disease, and 61 (39%) had EMD. Patients received the following BCMA CAR-T products: ide-cel (n = 77; 49%), cilta-cel (n = 46; 29%), and investigational agent (n = 35; 22%). The median follow-up was 24.8 months (95% CI 22.5–30.3).
Serological treatment response assessment was available at 1 and 3 months following BCMA CAR-T in 155 and 128 patients, respectively; the remaining patients either progressed and/or died before the landmark time point. ≥VGPR attainment occurred in 101 patients (65%) at 1 month, and CR attainment occurred in 52 patients (41%) at 3 months. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, a baseline LDH > 210 U/L (49% vs 75%; OR 0.31, p = 0.002) and EMD (29% vs 48%; OR 0.40, p = 0.02) were independently associated with lower odds of achieving a ≥VGPR and CR at 1 and 3 months, respectively (Supplementary Table 2).
Early serological response attainment and depth significantly correlated with PFS and OS following BCMA CAR-T (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. 1). Patients with a ≥VGPR at 1 month (PFS: 24.9 vs 3.6 months; OS: not reached [NR] vs 15.5 months) and CR at 3 months (PFS: 35.0 vs 11.9 months; OS: NR vs 38.1 months) had significantly longer PFS and OS. After adjusting for revised high-risk disease, LDH, ferritin, EMD, and BCMA CAR-T drug product, early response attainment at 1 month (PFS: HR 0.22, p < 0.001; OS: HR 0.34, p < 0.001) and 3 months (PFS: HR 0.35, p < 0.001; OS: HR 0.25, p = 0.001) both remained independently associated with significantly longer survival on multivariable modeling (Supplementary Table 3). Early serological attainment was also associated with prolonged survival in patients with and without EMD (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Baseline PET/CT was obtained in 107 patients (68%) before BCMA CAR-T. Baseline PET/CT was positive in 97 out of 107 patients (91%), and the following radiographic findings were identified: diffuse heterogeneous bone involvement (n = 21, 20%), focal bone lesions (n = 80, 80%), EMD (n = 49, 46%), and PMD (n = 33, 31%). Fifty-four patients (50%) had >3 focal bone lesions, and EMD involved the soft tissue and viscera in 23 (21%) and 27 (25%) patients, respectively. The presence of EMD with a SUVmax > 5.9 on baseline PET/CT was associated with a significantly shorter PFS and OS on multivariable modeling (Fig. 2; Supplementary Table 4), expanding upon similar data in transplant-eligible MM patients [11].
Kaplan–Meier curves for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to extramedullary status (EMD) as assessed on the baseline PET/CT (A, B). Patients with EMD were stratified into two groups based on the SUVmax measured by PET/CT: low (SUVmax ≤5.9) and high (SUVmax >5.9). Patients without EMD had an estimated 18-month PFS of 54%, as compared to 41% and 12% in patients with low and high SUVmax EMD, respectively. In addition, patients without EMD had an estimated 18-month OS of 81%, as compared to 71% and 39% in patients with low and high SUVmax EMD, respectively. SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value.
Among the patients with a positive baseline PET/CT, 54 and 23 had a re-staging scan at 1 and 3 months, respectively. Baseline EMD was present in 50% and 78% of the patients with re-staging scans at 1 and 3 months, respectively. PET/CT negativity by the current (DS < 3) and proposed (DS < 4) response criteria occurred in 15 (28%) and 18 (33%) patients at 1 month, respectively, and in 10 (43%) and 19 (83%) patients at 3 months, respectively. In both the 1-month and 3-month landmark analyses, PET/CT negativity was not associated with PFS by the current or proposed response criteria (Supplementary Fig. 3). Fourteen patients had a re-staging PET/CT at 12 months, of whom 12 had attained PET/CT negativity (by both imaging response criteria). At 12 months, patients with PET/CT negativity had an estimated 36-month PFS and OS of 70% and 100%, respectively.
We also evaluated the prognostic impact of achieving an early combined serological and PET/CT response. Early combined response attainment at 1 month was not associated with PFS (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). However, there was a trend for longer PFS in patients with a combined CR and PET/CT negativity at 3 months (18-month PFS: 100% vs 52%; p = 0.18; Supplementary Fig. 4).
Overall, we show that early serological response attainment—specifically, ≥VGPR at 1 months or CR at 3 months—is significantly associated with both prolonged PFS and OS following BCMA CAR-T, including in MM patients with EMD. Wong and colleagues reported similar findings in a smaller study (n = 54), which showed that early serum free light normalization on days 15 or 30 following BCMA CAR-T correlated with longer PFS [12]. Collectively, these data establish early serological response attainment as an important treatment goal and a prognostic marker for MM patients treated with BCMA CAR-T. We also show that MM patients who are unlikely to derive long-term benefit from BCMA CAR-T can be identified based on early serological response kinetics, thereby providing the framework for a response-adapted risk stratification following BCMA CAR-T. This observation provides the rationale for early treatment intensification in MM patients with suboptimal early responses to BCMA CAR-T, and should herald clinical trials evaluating this management strategy. Phase 2 clinical trials investigating consolidation therapy after ide-cel with elranatamab (NCT06138275) and talquetamab (NCT06066346) are now actively ongoing. Maintenance therapy after ide-cel is also under active investigation with trials involving lenalidomide (NCT05032820), iberdomide (NCT06179888), and mezigdomide (NCT06048250). Similarly, the presence of EMD with a SUVmax > 5.9 on baseline PET/CT was associated with a significantly shorter PFS and OS on multivariable analysis, providing the rationale for exploring debulking options prior to CAR-T.
An unexpected finding was that early PET/CT negativity was not prognostic for survival after BCMA CAR-T. There are several potential explanations for this finding. Firstly, the lack of standardization regarding the timing and requirements for re-staging scans likely introduced selection bias. Secondly, our PET/CT cohort was highly enriched for patients with EMD. It is possible that delayed or impaired effectiveness of BCMA CAR-T against EMD contributed to the lack of prognostic value for early PET/CT negativity. Consistent with this hypothesis, a recent retrospective study by Born and colleagues showed that PET/CT negativity at 1 month correlated with longer PFS following BCMA CAR-T [13]. However, none of the patients with EMD or PMD attained PET/CT negativity at 1 month, suggesting that patients with a low tumor burden drove the prognostic impact they identified [13]. Re-staging scans at later time points may therefore offer improved prognostic value. Indeed, we observed a prolonged PFS in the subset of patients with a combined serological CR and PET/CT negativity at 3 months (18-month PFS: 100%) and 12 months (36-month PFS: 70%). A similar finding was reported for MRD-negative patients after ide-cel in KarMMa, wherein the survival benefit of a concurrent negative PET/CT became more pronounced at later landmark time points [14]. In the IMAJEM trial, PET/CT negativity also became significantly prognostic later in the treatment course at the pre-maintenance stage [8]. Additional studies are nevertheless needed to optimize the use of PET/CT in MM patients treated with BCMA CAR-T.
A notable limitation of this study is the lack of data on MRD negativity in patients who achieve early deep serological responses. Two previous studies suggested that early attainment of MRD negativity at 1 and 3 months correlated with longer survival following BCMA CAR-T, though persistent EMD was often associated with a transient MRD-negative status without ever attaining a serological CR [14, 15]. Future studies that integrate serological, MRD, and PET/CT responses assessments together may further refine response-adapted risk stratification following BCMA CAR-T.
In summary, our findings show that MM patients who achieve a serological ≥VGPR at 1 month or CR at 3 months after BCMA CAR-T have prolonged PFS and OS, whereas early PET/CT negativity at 1 month was not prognostic. This study provides the framework for a response-adapted risk stratification in MM patients treated with BCMA CAR-T.
Data availability
Data sharing requests will be considered by proposals to the corresponding author.
References
Raje N, Berdeja J, Lin Y, Siegel D, Jagannath S, Madduri D, et al. Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy bb2121 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1726–37.
Munshi NC, Anderson LD, Shah N, Madduri D, Berdeja J, Lonial S, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:705–16.
Rodriguez-Otero P, Ailawadhi S, Arnulf B, Patel K, Cavo M, Nooka AK, et al. Ide-cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:1002–14.
Berdeja JG, Madduri D, Usmani SZ, Jakubowiak A, Agha M, Cohen AD, et al. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-1): a phase 1b/2 open-label study. Lancet. 2021;398:314–24.
San-Miguel J, Dhakal B, Yong K, Spencer A, Anguille S, Mateos MV, et al. Cilta-cel or standard care in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:335–47.
Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:e328–e346.
Usmani SZ, Mitchell A, Waheed S, Crowley J, Hoering A, Petty N, et al. Prognostic implications of serial 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography in multiple myeloma treated with total therapy 3. Blood. 2013;121:1819–23.
Moreau P, Attal M, Caillot D, Macro M, Karlin L, Garderet L, et al. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging and [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography at diagnosis and before maintenance therapy in symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma included in the IFM/DFCI 2009 trial: results of the IMAJEM study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2911–8.
Zamagni E, Nanni C, Dozza L, Carlier T, Bailly C, Tacchetti P, et al. Standardization of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT according to deauville criteria for metabolic complete response definition in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:116–25.
Zugasti I, Tormo-Ratera M, Oliver-Caldés A, Soler-Perromat JC, González-Calle V, Moreno DF, et al. Clinical impact of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in ARI0002h treatment, a CAR-T against BCMA for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2025;9:571–82.
Zamagni E, Patriarca F, Nanni C, Zannetti B, Englaro E, Pezzi A, et al. Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. Blood. 2011;118:5989–95.
Wong SW, Shah N, Ledergor G, Martin T, Wolf J, Shui AM, et al. Early dynamics and depth of response in multiple myeloma patients treated with BCMA CAR-T cells. Front Oncol. 2021;11:783703.
Born P, Fandrei D, Wang SY, Perez-Fernandez C, Fischer L, Ussmann J, et al. Prognostic significance of PET/CT for CAR T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Hemasphere. 2025;9:e70159.
Paiva B, Manrique I, Rytlewski J, Campbell T, Kazanecki CC, Martin N, et al. Time-dependent prognostic value of serological and measurable residual disease assessments after Idecabtagene vicleucel. Blood Cancer Discov. 2023;4:365–73.
Bansal R, Baksh M, Larsen JT, Hathcock MA, Dingli D, Stewart AK, et al. Prognostic value of early bone marrow MRD status in CAR-T therapy for myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2023;13:47.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the multi-disciplinary care teams, the patients, and their families who made this study possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JNG, JAS, UM, and NSR designed the study and analyzed the data. JNG, JAS, and FB collected the data. DDC, ARB, BRP, MVM, MJF, AJY, UM, and NSR provided clinical care to the patients. JNG and NSR wrote the initial manuscript. All authors critically reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
MVM is an inventor on patents related to adoptive cell therapies, held by Massachusetts General Hospital (some licensed to Promab and Luminary) and University of Pennsylvania (some licensed to Novartis), receives Grant/Research support from: Kite Pharma, Moderna, Sobi, holds Equity in 2SeventyBio, A2Bio, Affyimmune, BendBio, Cargo, GBM newco, Model T bio, Neximmune, Oncternal. MVM serves on the board of directors of 2Seventy Bio and is or has been a consultant for A2Bio, Adaptimmune, Affyimmune, BMS, Cabaletta, Cargo, In8bio, GSK, Kite Pharma, Neximmune, Novartis, Oncternal, Sobi. MJF has been a consultant for Novartis, BMS, JnJ/Legend, Kite/Gilead, Cytoagents, and SOBI. AJY has been a consultant for AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Prothena, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sebia, Takeda, and has received research funding to the institution from Amgen, BMS, GSK, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), and Sanofi. UM is a co-founder, shareholder, and consultant to CytoSite Biopharma. NSR has been a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, Immuneel, GSK, K36 Therapeutics, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca, and has received research funding to the institution from Pfizer. The remaining authors have no competing interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gustine, J.N., Scaringi, J.A., Bauer, F. et al. Prognostic value of serological and PET/CT response kinetics in patients with multiple myeloma treated with BCMA CAR-T. Leukemia (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-025-02819-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-025-02819-9

