Table 2 Comparison of the measured equivalent pressure sensitivity and calculated pressure sensitivity under a static state.

From: Design and implementation of a jellyfish otolith-inspired MEMS vector hydrophone for low-frequency detection

Frequency (Hz)

Receiving sensitivity Sx (dB)

20 log(kd) (dB)

Equivalent pressure sensitivity Sp (dB)

OVH

LVH

CuVH

WIVH

OVH

LVH

CuVH

WIVH

20

−214.4

−219.0

−220.6

−229.5

−41.5

−172.9

−177.5

−179.1

−188.0

31.5

−213.5

−213.5

−217.5

−224.0

−37.6

−175.9

−175.9

−179.9

−186.4

40

−211.7

−211.5

−216.0

−220.7

−35.5

−176.2

−176.0

−180.5

−185.2

50

−208.3

−209.7

−214.0

−219.2

−33.6

−174.7

−176.1

−180.4

−185.6

63

−207.0

−208.0

−212.5

−218.0

−31.6

−175.4

−176.4

−180.9

−186.4

80

−203.3

−205.7

−211.8

−216.3

−29.5

−173.8

−176.2

−182.3

−186.8

100

−202.1

−205.0

−209.2

−215.4

−27.6

−174.5

−177.4

−181.6

−187.8

125

−199.0

−203.6

−208.0

−214.1

−25.6

−173.4

−178.0

−182.4

−188.5

160

−194.7

−201.8

−206.0

−212.7

−23.5

−171.2

−178.3

−182.5

−189.2

200

−191.7

−199.2

−204.7

−211.4

−21.5

−170.2

−177.7

−183.2

−189.9

Average equivalent pressure sensitivity Sp (dB)

−173.8

−177.0

−181.3

−187.4

Difference in the average equivalent pressure sensitivity compared to that of the OVH (dB)

−3.2

−7.5

−13.6

Maximum stress on the beam via simulation (kPa)

131.7

114.8

58.1

35.2

Calculated pressure sensitivity under a static state Sp_c (dB)a

−157.0

−158.2

−164.1

−168.5

Difference in the calculated pressure sensitivity under a static state compared to that of the OVH (dB)

−1.2

−7.1

−11.5

  1. a\(S_{p\_c} = 20{\mathrm{log}}\left( {\frac{{\pi _l\sigma _{{\mathrm{max}}V_{{\mathrm{in}}}\,A}}}{{M_{{\mathrm{ref}}}}}} \right)\), πl is the piezoresistance coefficient, σmax is the maximum stress on the beam, Vin is the input voltage, A is the amplification factor, and Mref is the reference sensitivity of 0 dB (1 V/μPa).