Table 2 Comparison of the measured equivalent pressure sensitivity and calculated pressure sensitivity under a static state.
Frequency (Hz) | Receiving sensitivity Sx (dB) | 20 log(kd) (dB) | Equivalent pressure sensitivity Sp (dB) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OVH | LVH | CuVH | WIVH | OVH | LVH | CuVH | WIVH | ||
20 | −214.4 | −219.0 | −220.6 | −229.5 | −41.5 | −172.9 | −177.5 | −179.1 | −188.0 |
31.5 | −213.5 | −213.5 | −217.5 | −224.0 | −37.6 | −175.9 | −175.9 | −179.9 | −186.4 |
40 | −211.7 | −211.5 | −216.0 | −220.7 | −35.5 | −176.2 | −176.0 | −180.5 | −185.2 |
50 | −208.3 | −209.7 | −214.0 | −219.2 | −33.6 | −174.7 | −176.1 | −180.4 | −185.6 |
63 | −207.0 | −208.0 | −212.5 | −218.0 | −31.6 | −175.4 | −176.4 | −180.9 | −186.4 |
80 | −203.3 | −205.7 | −211.8 | −216.3 | −29.5 | −173.8 | −176.2 | −182.3 | −186.8 |
100 | −202.1 | −205.0 | −209.2 | −215.4 | −27.6 | −174.5 | −177.4 | −181.6 | −187.8 |
125 | −199.0 | −203.6 | −208.0 | −214.1 | −25.6 | −173.4 | −178.0 | −182.4 | −188.5 |
160 | −194.7 | −201.8 | −206.0 | −212.7 | −23.5 | −171.2 | −178.3 | −182.5 | −189.2 |
200 | −191.7 | −199.2 | −204.7 | −211.4 | −21.5 | −170.2 | −177.7 | −183.2 | −189.9 |
Average equivalent pressure sensitivity Sp (dB) | −173.8 | −177.0 | −181.3 | −187.4 | |||||
Difference in the average equivalent pressure sensitivity compared to that of the OVH (dB) | – | −3.2 | −7.5 | −13.6 | |||||
Maximum stress on the beam via simulation (kPa) | 131.7 | 114.8 | 58.1 | 35.2 | |||||
Calculated pressure sensitivity under a static state Sp_c (dB)a | −157.0 | −158.2 | −164.1 | −168.5 | |||||
Difference in the calculated pressure sensitivity under a static state compared to that of the OVH (dB) | – | −1.2 | −7.1 | −11.5 | |||||