Fig. 6: Performance comparison between the FPPF solver and FCNN predictor for characterizing the Csm of cells from the control and drug-treated groups. | Microsystems & Nanoengineering

Fig. 6: Performance comparison between the FPPF solver and FCNN predictor for characterizing the Csm of cells from the control and drug-treated groups.

From: piRT-IFC: Physics-informed real-time impedance flow cytometry for the characterization of cellular intrinsic electrical properties

Fig. 6: Performance comparison between the FPPF solver and FCNN predictor for characterizing the Csm of cells from the control and drug-treated groups.

a The Csm distributions of the last cycle in the control group characterized by two methods. b The Csm distributions of the last cycle in the drug-treated group characterized by two methods. The green dotted box indicates a significant difference between the proportion of the FPPF solver and the FCNN predictor. c Histogram of R2 of cells’ Csm from the control group and drug-treated group predicted with FCNN, represented as the mean ± SD

Back to article page