Fig. 6: Trampoline design. | Microsystems & Nanoengineering

Fig. 6: Trampoline design.

From: Comparative analysis of nanomechanical resonators: sensitivity, response time, and practical considerations in photothermal sensing

Fig. 6

a Optical micrograph of a trampoline resonator. b Resonance frequency for 50 nm thick trampoline resonators of different central area side lengths. The window side length is fixed to Lw ≈ 1 mm, while the tether width is to w = 5 μm. From the measurements, a stress of 120 MPa is extracted. c Comparison between theoretical (black solid curve) and experimental thermal time constant τth. d Comparison between theoretical (solid curves) and measured (dark red circles) relative power responsivity. The error bar indicates the uncertainties in κ (2.7 − 4 W/(m K)), E (200 − 300 GPa), and αth (1 − 2.2 ppm/K)16. e Allan deviation measured for a 2302 μm2 central area trampoline (green solid curve), driven at the onset of nonlinearities \({z}_{{{\rm{r}}}_{{\rm{c}}}}\), with low-pass filter bandwidth \({f}_{{\rm{demod}}}=2.5\,{\rm{kHz}}\), PLL bandwidth fPLL = 500 Hz and optical input power P0 = 11 μW. The comparison with the theoretical model is also shown (black solid curve), together with the single contributions (see main text). f Comparison between the theoretical (black solid curve) and experimentally extracted (dark red circles) NEP. For each trampoline’s central length, three different resonators were characterized in terms of NEP

Back to article page