Table 1 Summary of AI-enhanced gas sensors
From: AI‑driven photonic noses: from conventional sensors to cloud‑to-edge intelligent microsystems
AI algorithms | Target gases | Benefits of AI | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
PSO-SVM | CO and CO2 | Highest predictive accuracy for single/dual gas inversion; suppressed cavity-mode noise; reduced LoD to 8.2 ppmv (CO) and 13.2/4.7 ppmv (CO₂/CO) | Ref. 182 |
Machine Learning Classifier (MLC) | Common acyclic hydrocarbons | Enabled handheld FADA microspectrometer to classify hydrocarbons down to 75 ppm; single-gas LoD ~32 ppm; fast, label-free gas identification | Ref. 26 |
1D Convolutional Neural Network | H2O, CO2, O2, N2O, CO, CH2, NO, SO2, NO2, NH3 | Automated feature extraction from IR spectra; speciation accuracy 82–97% on multi-component mixtures; replaces manual spectral interpretation | Ref. 290 |
Convolutional Neural Network | Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene | Precise simultaneous concentration predictions; R2 > 0.99 for toluene/ethylbenzene/o-xylene and >0.96 for benzene; robust against low-PEL species | Ref. 291 |
TSMC-Net (Deep Convolutional Neural Network) | Eight volatile organic compounds (VOCs) | High precision, recall, and accuracy for multigas classification from THz absorption; interpretable via class activation maps; portable THz sensor ready | Ref. 292 |
Support Vector Machine with Selectivity Factor Analysis | Mixed gases via metal-oxide sensor arrays | Established a direct proportionality between a sensor’s selectivity factor and concentration-prediction accuracy; showed that combining sensors with complementary selectivity profiles can significantly boost prediction performance | Ref. 293 |
Deep Neural Network | Hydrogen (H2) at concentrations below the conventional limit of detection | Extracted “hidden” sensing signals buried in noise, enhancing detection of H₂ below the traditional LOD; demonstrated universality across different sensor materials without modifying the sensors themselves | Ref. 294 |
Random Forest, ANN, k-Nearest Neighbors | Natural gas mixtures (CH4, two NG simulants, CH4 + NH3) | Achieved >98% identification accuracy across four gas classes; optimized model complexity to avoid overfitting; demonstrated sub-10 ms training and <0.1 ms inference on single-board hardware, enabling real-time IoT deployment | Ref. 295 |
Grey-Box SVM (physical + ML hybrid) | NOx and NH3 in combustion exhaust | Predicted sensor outputs (NOx cell current) over wide operating conditions and ammonia cross-sensitivities with high accuracy; leverages physical insight to choose only nine key features, reducing overfitting and computational load | Ref. 296 |
Boosted Regression Trees, Boosted Linear Regression, Gaussian Process | Ambient NO2 and Ox (O3 + NO2) using clustered low-cost electrochemical sensors | Combined cluster-median signals from six sensors with ML to suppress inter-sensor drift and environmental variability; ML models outperformed linear regression, producing NO2/Ox estimates comparable in RMSE to reference monitors while consuming <200 mW | Ref. 297 |
Unsupervised Neural Network with Physics-Informed Augmentation | Five gas species over 2900–3100 cm-1 | Overcame scarce data and baseline-drift issues; achieved simultaneous identification, concentration retrieval, and pressure prediction for 31 mixtures with sub-ppb sensitivity | Ref. 298 |
Machine-Learning-Driven Wavelength Selection + Dual ANN Design | Various gas mixtures via micro-resonator arrays | Automatically selected optimal probe wavelengths based on gas absorption fingerprints; two ANNs then map wavelengths to resonator geometries, enabling compact, tunable sensor modules with precise multi-gas detection | Ref. 28 |
Stepwise Multilayer Perceptron (SMLP) | CO2 and CH4 in NDIR multipass optical measurement | Iteratively performs mixture classification then selective regression, automating feature extraction; yields 98.21% classification accuracy and normalized RMSE of 0.42%/0.45% with only 0.5 s of data and fewer training samples | Ref. 299 |
Deep Belief Network & Convolutional Neural Network | Toxic gas dispersion from point source emissions | Modeled complex dispersion fields with DBN and CNN to predict concentration contours faster and more accurately than Gaussian plume, CFD, and traditional ML models; demonstrated improved prediction accuracy for emergency response planning | Ref. 300 |
3D Convolutional Neural Network (LCNet) | O3 and Cl2 in gas mixtures via liquid-crystal film optical responses | Analyzed spatiotemporal color patterns of LC anchoring transitions to simultaneously identify O3 and Cl2 and quantify their concentrations; revealed that O3 is detected via transition timing and Cl2 via late-stage color fluctuations | Ref. 301 |
Deep-learning neural separator | CO and CH4 | Resolves ultra-high spectral overlap via simulated training; achieves R² of 0.9996 (CH₄) and 0.9930 (CO); real-time LoD of 120.9 ppm (CH₄) and 0.5 ppm (CO); low system complexity and simultaneous detection | Ref. 302 |
VOC-Net (1D CNN) | Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) | Automates classification with >99% accuracy on simulations and 97% on noisy experimental data; provides interpretable Grad-CAM explanations | Ref. 303 |
1D CNN & deep MLP | Methane and acetylene | End-to-end concentration retrieval from direct absorption spectra; surpasses wavelength modulation spectroscopy in precision; robust to noise, laser aging, and circuit variations | Ref. 304 |
PCA, neural networks, regression | Humidity (water vapor) | Learns leaky-mode ATR reflectance dips to predict relative humidity with 0.3% accuracy using limited data; ML matches or exceeds physical-model fitting | Ref. 305 |
ML framework (multi-task + CNN) | Mixed-gas (ethylene, CO, CH4) | Combines tailored pre-processing, multi-task learning, and CNN architecture to significantly boost mixed-gas concentration prediction on UCI dataset compared to prior methods | Ref. 306 |
PCA, ANN, DNN, 1D CNN | Indoor VOCs: benzene, xylene, toluene, formaldehyde, ethanol | Discriminates five indoor pollutants under varying humidity and temperature; DNNs on full transients offer best performance; can reduce array to two sensors without loss of accuracy | Ref. 307 |
Temporal-based SVM with moving-window decision logic | CO, O3, NO2 | Achieves 100% accuracy in both training and testing for multi-pollutant mixtures; allows user-tunable confidence thresholds to control false alarms and detection confidence | Ref. 308 |
Convolutional Neural Network | CO, NH3, NO2, CH4, acetone | Enables real-time gas identification with response times 1–19 s and 98% accuracy using a batch-uniform SMO sensor array; overcomes array non-uniformity | Ref. 309 |
Early-fusion multimodal AI (LSTM + CNN) | Four gas classes (via semiconductor array + thermal imagery) | Fuses gas-sensor time series (LSTM) and thermal images (CNN) to achieve 96% identification accuracy, outperforming sensor-only (82%) and vision-only (93%) models | Ref. 310 |
Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) + neuromorphic hardware synapses | NO2 and H2S | Processes sequential FET-sensor transients with 1.94% error in high-level tests; hardware RNN system runs at 0.412 mW with 0.3% overall error, ensuring low-power, reliable gas classification | Ref. 311 |