Abstract
Identifying the mechanisms of action of anticancer drugs is an important step in the development of new drugs. In this study, we established a comprehensive screening platform consisting of 68 oncogenes (MANO panel), encompassing 243 genetic variants, to identify predictive markers for drug efficacy. Validation was performed using drugs that targeted EGFR, BRAF, and MAP2K1, which confirmed the utility of this functional screening panel. Screening of a BRCA2-knockout DLD1 cell line (DLD1-KO) revealed that cells expressing SMO and GLI1 were resistant to olaparib. Gene set enrichment analysis identified genes associated with DNA damage repair that were enriched in cells overexpressing SMO and GLI1. The expression of genes associated with homologous recombination repair (HR), such as the FANC family and BRCA1/2, was significantly upregulated by GLI1 expression, which is indicative of PARP inhibitor resistance. Although not all representative genes of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway were upregulated, NER activity was enhanced by GLI1. The GLI1 inhibitor was effective against DLD1-KO cells overexpressing GLI1 both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, the combination therapy of olaparib and GLI1 inhibitor exhibited a synergistic effect on DLD1-KO, suggesting the possible clinical application of GLI1 inhibitor targeting cancer with defective DNA damage repair. This platform enables the identification of biomarkers associated with drug sensitivity, and is a useful tool for drug development.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 50 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $5.18 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout





Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data generated in this study are available within the article and its supplementary table files.
Change history
13 September 2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-024-03159-1
References
Kohsaka S, Nagano M, Ueno T, Suehara Y, Hayashi T, Shimada N. et al. A method of high-throughput functional evaluation of EGFR gene variants of unknown significance in cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:eaan6566.
Ikeuchi H, Hirose T, Ikegami M, Takamochi K, Suzuki K, Mano H, et al. Preclinical assessment of combination therapy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a highly heterogeneous tumor model. Oncogene. 2022;41:2470–9.
Hayes TK, Aquilanti E, Persky NS, Yang X, Kim EE, Brenan L, et al. Comprehensive mutational scanning of EGFR reveals TKI sensitivities of extracellular domain mutants. Nat Commun. 2024;15:2742.
Robichaux JP, Le X, Vijayan RSK, Hicks JK, Heeke S, Elamin YY, et al. Structure-based classification predicts drug response in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Nature. 2021;597:732–7.
Robert C, Karaszewska B, Schachter J, Rutkowski P, Mackiewicz A, Stroiakovski D, et al. Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:30–9.
Planchard D, Besse B, Groen HJM, Souquet PJ, Quoix E, Baik CS, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with previously treated BRAF(V600E)-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicentre phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:984–93.
Subbiah V, Kreitman RJ, Wainberg ZA, Gazzah A, Lassen U, Stein A, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAFV600E-mutated rare cancers: the phase 2 ROAR trial. Nat Med. 2023;29:1103–12.
Bryant HE, Schultz N, Thomas HD, Parker KM, Flower D, Lopez E, et al. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature. 2005;434:913–7.
Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ, Tutt AN, Johnson DA, Richardson TB, et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature. 2005;434:917–21.
Lord CJ, Ashworth A. PARP inhibitors: synthetic lethality in the clinic. Science. 2017;355:1152–8.
Petropoulos M, Karamichali A, Rossetti GG, Freudenmann A, Iacovino LG, Dionellis VS, et al. Transcription-replication conflicts underlie sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Nature. 2024;628:433–41.
Li H, Liu ZY, Wu N, Chen YC, Cheng Q, Wang J. PARP inhibitor resistance: the underlying mechanisms and clinical implications. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:107.
Lee E, Matulonis UA. PARP inhibitor resistance mechanisms and implications for post-progression combination therapies. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:2054
Pettitt SJ, Frankum JR, Punta M, Lise S, Alexander J, Chen Y, et al. Clinical BRCA1/2 reversion analysis identifies hotspot mutations and predicted neoantigens associated with therapy resistance. Cancer Discov. 2020;10:1475–88.
Lin KK, Harrell MI, Oza AM, Oaknin A, Ray-Coquard I, Tinker AV, et al. BRCA reversion mutations in circulating tumor DNA predict primary and acquired resistance to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in high-grade ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2019;9:210–9.
Liu Y, Burness ML, Martin-Trevino R, Guy J, Bai S, Harouaka R, et al. RAD51 mediates resistance of cancer stem cells to PARP inhibition in triple-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:514–22.
Xu G, Chapman JR, Brandsma I, Yuan J, Mistrik M, Bouwman P, et al. REV7 counteracts DNA double-strand break resection and affects PARP inhibition. Nature. 2015;521:541–4.
Noordermeer SM, Adam S, Setiaputra D, Barazas M, Pettitt SJ, Ling AK, et al. The shieldin complex mediates 53BP1-dependent DNA repair. Nature. 2018;560:117–21.
Gupta R, Somyajit K, Narita T, Maskey E, Stanlie A, Kremer M, et al. DNA repair network analysis reveals shieldin as a key regulator of NHEJ and PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Cell. 2018;173:972–988 e923.
Jaspers JE, Kersbergen A, Boon U, Sol W, van Deemter L, Zander SA, et al. Loss of 53BP1 causes PARP inhibitor resistance in Brca1-mutated mouse mammary tumors. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:68–81.
He YJ, Meghani K, Caron MC, Yang C, Ronato DA, Bian J, et al. DYNLL1 binds to MRE11 to limit DNA end resection in BRCA1-deficient cells. Nature. 2018;563:522–6.
Nagano M, Kohsaka S, Ueno T, Kojima S, Saka K, Iwase H, et al. High-throughput functional evaluation of variants of unknown significance in ERBB2. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:5112–22.
Kudo K, Gavin E, Das S, Amable L, Shevde LA, Reed E. Inhibition of Gli1 results in altered c-Jun activation, inhibition of cisplatin-induced upregulation of ERCC1, XPD and XRCC1, and inhibition of platinum-DNA adduct repair. Oncogene. 2012;31:4718–24.
Avery JT, Zhang R, Boohaker RJ. GLI1: a therapeutic target for cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:673154.
Infante P, Mori M, Alfonsi R, Ghirga F, Aiello F, Toscano S, et al. Gli1/DNA interaction is a druggable target for Hedgehog-dependent tumors. EMBO J. 2015;34:200–17.
Hirose T, Ikegami M, Endo M, Matsumoto Y, Nakashima Y, Mano H, et al. Extensive functional evaluation of exon 20 insertion mutations of EGFR. Lung Cancer. 2021;152:135–42.
Mizuno S, Ikegami M, Koyama T, Sunami K, Ogata D, Kage H, et al. High-throughput functional evaluation of MAP2K1 variants in cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2023;22:227–39.
Nakamura IT, Kohsaka S, Ikegami M, Ikeuchi H, Ueno T, Li K, et al. Comprehensive functional evaluation of variants of fibroblast growth factor receptor genes in cancer. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2021;5:66.
Ikegami M, Kohsaka S, Ueno T, Momozawa Y, Inoue S, Tamura K, et al. High-throughput functional evaluation of BRCA2 variants of unknown significance. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2573.
Xia R, Xu M, Yang J, Ma X. The role of Hedgehog and Notch signaling pathway in cancer. Mol Biomed. 2022;3:44.
Suchors C, Kim J. Canonical Hedgehog pathway and noncanonical GLI transcription factor activation in cancer. Cells. 2022;11.
Mani C, Tripathi K, Omy TR, Reedy M, Manne U, Palle K. GLI1-targeting drugs induce replication stress and homologous recombination deficiency and synergize with PARP-targeted therapies in triple negative breast cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2022;1868:166300.
Mani C, Tripathi K, Chaudhary S, Somasagara RR, Rocconi RP, Crasto C, et al. Hedgehog/GLI1 transcriptionally regulates FANCD2 in ovarian tumor cells: its inhibition induces HR-deficiency and synergistic lethality with PARP inhibition. Neoplasia. 2021;23:1002–15.
Palle K, Mani C, Tripathi K, Athar M. Aberrant GLI1 activation in DNA damage response, carcinogenesis and chemoresistance. Cancers. 2015;7:2330–51.
Yoshioka KI, Kusumoto-Matsuo R, Matsuno Y, Ishiai M. Genomic instability and cancer risk associated with erroneous DNA Repair. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:12254.
Qin S, Kitty I, Hao Y, Zhao F, Kim W. Maintaining genome integrity: protein kinases and phosphatases orchestrate the balancing act of DNA double-strand breaks repair in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:10212.
Brambati A, Sacco O, Porcella S, Heyza J, Kareh M, Schmidt JC, et al. RHINO directs MMEJ to repair DNA breaks in mitosis. Science. 2023;381:653–60.
Fleury H, MacEachern MK, Stiefel CM, Anand R, Sempeck C, Nebenfuehr B, et al. The APE2 nuclease is essential for DNA double-strand break repair by microhomology-mediated end joining. Mol Cell. 2023;83:1429–1445 e1428.
Chandramouly G, Jamsen J, Borisonnik N, Tyagi M, Calbert ML, Tredinnick T, et al. Pollambda promotes microhomology-mediated end-joining. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2023;30:107–14.
Apelt K, Lans H, Scharer OD, Luijsterburg MS. Nucleotide excision repair leaves a mark on chromatin: DNA damage detection in nucleosomes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78:7925–42.
Renaudin X, Rosselli F. The FANC/BRCA pathway releases replication blockades by eliminating DNA interstrand cross-links. Genes (Basel). 2020;11:585
Nayak S, Calvo JA, Cantor SB. Targeting translesion synthesis (TLS) to expose replication gaps, a unique cancer vulnerability. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2021;25:27–36.
Peake JD, Noguchi E. Fanconi anemia: current insights regarding epidemiology, cancer, and DNA repair. Hum Genet. 2022;141:1811–36.
Nieddu V, Melocchi V, Battistini C, Franciosa G, Lupia M, Stellato C, et al. Matrix Gla Protein drives stemness and tumor initiation in ovarian cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14:220.
Karin-Kujundzic V, Covarrubias-Pinto A, Skrtic A, Vranic S, Serman L. New insight into the role of PTCH1 protein in serous ovarian carcinomas. Int J Oncol. 2022;61:145.
Kuehn J, Espinoza-Sanchez NA, Teixeira F, Pavao MSG, Kiesel L, Gyorffy B, et al. Prognostic significance of hedgehog signaling network-related gene expression in breast cancer patients. J Cell Biochem. 2021;122:577–97.
Guo P, Chen Q, Peng K, Xie J, Liu J, Ren W, et al. Nuclear receptor coactivator SRC-1 promotes colorectal cancer progression through enhancing GLI2-mediated Hedgehog signaling. Oncogene. 2022;41:2846–59.
Kotulak-Chrzaszcz A, Kmiec Z, Wierzbicki PM. Sonic Hedgehog signaling pathway in gynecological and genitourinary cancer (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2021;47.
Lama-Sherpa TD, Lin VTG, Metge BJ, Weeks SE, Chen D, Samant RS, et al. Hedgehog signaling enables repair of ribosomal DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:10342–52.
Akagi T, Sasai K, Hanafusa H. Refractory nature of normal human diploid fibroblasts with respect to oncogene-mediated transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:13567–72.
Hirose T, Ikegami M, Kojima S, Yoshida A, Endo M, Shimada E, et al. Extensive analysis of 59 sarcoma-related fusion genes identified pazopanib as a potential inhibitor to COL1A1-PDGFB fusion gene. Cancer Sci. 2023;114:4089–100.
Koga T, Suda K, Mitsudomi T. Utility of the Ba/F3 cell system for exploring on-target mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2022;113:815–27.
Zheng S, Wang W, Aldahdooh J, Malyutina A, Shadbahr T, Tanoli Z, et al. SynergyFinder plus: toward better interpretation and annotation of drug combination screening datasets. Genomics Proteom Bioinform. 2022;20:587–96.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the members of our division, particularly A. Maruyama-Shiino, Y. Ono, and M. Takeyama for technical assistance.
Funding
This study was supported by the grants of Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control (grant no. JP22ck0106536), Program for Promoting Platform of Genomics based Drug Discovery (grant no. JP23kk0305018), and Moonshot Research and Development Program (grant no. JP22zf0127009) from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), and also supported by the JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (grant no. JP21H02795).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SK conceived of the project and designed the study. SK and HM developed the study methodology. HI, YM., and RKM performed experiments. HO, YK, KY, and YY provided clinical samples. HI, TU, MI, and SK analyzed and interpreted the data. KY, KT, KS, and HM provided the administrative and technical support. HI, YM, RKM, HM, and SK wrote and edited the manuscript with feedback from all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ikeuchi, H., Matsuno, Y., Kusumoto-Matsuo, R. et al. GLI1 confers resistance to PARP inhibitors by activating the DNA damage repair pathway. Oncogene 43, 3037–3048 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-024-03105-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-024-03105-1
This article is cited by
-
Clinical approaches to overcome PARP inhibitor resistance
Molecular Cancer (2025)


