Table 1 Summary of pivotal trials for second-generation ARIs in nmCRPC.
Study description | Randomized phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apalutamide vs. placebo in patients with nmCRPC (N = 1207) | Randomized phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enzalutamide vs placebo in patients with nmCRPC (N = 1401) | Randomized phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of darolutamide vs placebo in patients with nmCRPC (N = 1509) |
Patient population | nmCRPC with PSADT ≤ 10 months | nmCRPC with BL PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL and PSADT ≤ 10 months | nmCRPC with PSADT ≤ 10 months |
No lesions detectable by CT/MRI or bone scan | No lesions detectable by CT/MRI and bone scan and no history of seizure | No lesions detectable by CT/MRI or bone scan | |
Primary analysis | |||
Median follow-up | 20.3 months | Enzalutamide: 18.5 months Placebo: 15.1 months | 17.9 months |
Primary endpoint (drug vs. placebo) | Median MFS, assessed from randomization until radiographic progression by blinded independent central review or death | Median MFS, assessed from randomization until radiographic progression by blinded independent central review or death | Median MFS, assessed from randomization until radiographic progression by blinded independent central review or death |
40.5 vs. 16.2 months; HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.23–0.35; P < 0.001 | 36.6 vs. 14.7 months; HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.24–0.35; P < 0.001 | 40.4 vs. 18.4 months; HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.34–0.50; P < 0.001 | |
Secondary endpoints evaluated in a hierarchical order (drug vs. placebo) | Median PFS: 40.5 vs. 14.7 months; HR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.24–0.36; P < 0.001 | Median time to PSA progression: 37.2 vs. 3.9 months; HR 0.07; 95% CI 0.05–0.08; P < 0.001 | Median OS: NR vs. NR; HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.50–0.99; P = 0.045 |
Median time to symptomatic progression: NR vs. NR; HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.32–0.63; P < 0.001 | Median time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy: 39.6 vs. 17.7 months; HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.17–0.26; P < 0.001 | Median time to pain progression: 40.3 vs. 25.4 months; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.53–0.79 | |
Median OS: NR vs. 39.0 months; HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.47–1.04; P = 0.07 | Median OS: NR vs. NR; HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.58–1.09; P = 0.15 | Median time to first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy: NR vs. 38.2 months; HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.31–0.60 | |
Median time to first cytotoxic chemotherapy: NR vs. NR; HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.29–0.66 | Median time to first SSE: NR vs. NR; HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.22–0.84 | ||
Median PFS: 36.8 vs. 14.8 months; HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.32–0.45 | |||
Median time to PSA progression: 33.2 vs. 7.3 months; HR 0.13; 95% CI 0.11–0.16 | |||
Final analysis | (N = 1207) | (N = 1401) | (N = 1509) |
Median follow-up | 52.0 months | 48.0 months | 29.0 months |
Secondary endpoints (drug vs. placebo) | Median OS: 73.9 vs. 59.9 months; HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.64–0.96; P = 0.016 | Median OS: 67.0 vs. 56.3 months; HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.61–0.89; P = 0.001 | Median OS: NR vs. NR; HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.53–0.88; P = 0.003 |
Median time to cytotoxic chemotherapy: NR vs. NR; HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.49–0.81; P = 0.0002 | Median time to use of cytotoxic chemotherapy: NR vs. NR; HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.44–0.67 | Median time to first cytotoxic chemotherapy: NR vs. NR; HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.44–0.76; P < 0.001 | |
Median time to symptomatic progression: NR vs. NR; HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44–0.73; P < 0.0001 | Median time to first use of new subsequent antineoplastic therapy: 66.7 vs. 19.1 months; HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.25–0.34 | Median time to pain progression: 40.3 vs. 25.4 months; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.53–0.79; P < 0.001 | |
Median time to PSA progression: 40.5 vs. 3.7 months; HR 0.07; 95% CI 0.06–0.09; P < 0.0001 | Chemotherapy-free survival: 58.3 vs. 41.6 months; HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.52–0.72 | Median time to first SSE: NR vs. NR; HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.29–0.82; P = 0.005 | |
Median time to second progression: 55.6 vs. 41.2 months; HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.46–0.66; P < 0.0001 | |||
HRQoL outcomes at primary analysis (drug vs. placebo)a | Change from baseline in mean ± SE FACT-P total score: −0.99 ± 0.98 vs. −3.29 ± 1.97 | BPI-SF (pain severity): time to progression 36.8 months vs. NR; HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57–0.97; P = 0.028 | BPI-SF (LSM time-adjusted AUC mean changes from baseline): pain interference: 1.1 vs. 1.3 points; difference −0.2; 95% CI −0.3 to −0.1 |
Change from baseline in mean ± SE EQ VAS score: 1.44 ± 0.87 vs. 0.26 ± 1.75 | FACT-P total score: time to deterioration 22.1 vs. 18.4 months; HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.69–0.99; P = 0.037 | Pain severity: 1.3 vs. 1.4 points; difference −0.2; 95% CI −0.3 to −0.1 | |
EORTC QLQ-PR25: time to deterioration | FACT-P total score (LSM time-adjusted AUC mean changes from baseline): 112.9 vs. 111.6 points; difference 1.3; 95% CI 0.4–2.1 | ||
Bowel symptoms and function: 33.2 vs. 25.9 months; HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59–0.89; P = 0.0018 | FACT-P PCS total score: time to deterioration 11.1 vs. 7.9 months; HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.70–0.91; P = 0.0005 | ||
Hormonal treatment-related symptoms: 33.2 vs. 36.8 months; HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.02–1.63; P = 0.035 | EORTC QLQ-PR25: time to deterioration | ||
Urinary symptoms: 36.9 vs. 25.9 months; HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.46–0.72; P < 0.0001 | Bowel symptoms: 18.4 vs. 11.5 months; HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.66–0.92; P < 0.01 | ||
Urinary symptoms: 25.8 vs. 14.8 months; HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.54–0.76; P < 0.01 |