Table 4 Subgroup analysis estimating the risk of MACE associated with GnRH antagonist comparing with GnRH agonist.
GnRH antagonist vs GnRH agonist | MACE | Composite CV events | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No of event | aHRa | (95% CI) | P value | No of event | aHR | (95% CI) | P value | |
Pre-existing CVD, initial staging N = 1 or M = 1 | ||||||||
GnRH antagonist (n = 106) | 34 | 0.98a | (0.66–1.45) | 0.9071 | 3 | 0.16b | (0.04–0.38) | 0.013 |
GnRH agonist (n = 1489) | 621 | 188 | ||||||
Receiving more than 6 months of ADT (GnRH antagonist ≥6 months vs GnRH agonist ≥6 months) | ||||||||
GnRH antagonist (n = 286) | 82 | 0.95 | (0.74–1.22) | 0.7023 | 15 | 0.30 | (0.16–0.54) | <0.0001 |
GnRH agonist (n = 10,615) | 3780 | 1637 | ||||||
Pre-existing CVD, receiving more than 6 months of ADT (GnRH antagonist ≥6 months vs GnRH agonist ≥6 months) | ||||||||
GnRH antagonist (n = 96) | 24 | 0.64c | (0.39–1.05) | 0.0757 | 3 | 0.12d | (0.03–0.49) | 0.0032 |
GnRH agonist (n = 2006) | 687 | 375 | ||||||