Fig. 4: Response according to the interplay between plasticity and context.

A. Connectivity strength at baseline in patients grouped according to their context quality and the week in which they achieved the response. Patients were defined as experiencing the Good and the Poor context as those scoring below the 40th percentile and above the 60th percentile, respectively, on the Q-LESQ-SF scale. B. Comparison of connectivity strength between all patients grouped according to their context quality and whether they achieved the response by week 9. Patients were defined as experiencing a Good and Mid-Poor context as those scoring below and above the 60th percentile, respectively, on the Q-LESQ-SF scale. *p < 0.05, **p = 0.01. $$ p = 0.009, $ p = 0.021, vs. No-response by week 9 experiencing a Good context.