Table 4 A comparison of several methods for generating optically clear tissues for immunofluorescence staining

From: Deep imaging of LepR+ stromal cells in optically cleared murine bone hemisections

Method

Applicable tissues

Compatible with immunostaining?

Preservation of endogenous fluorescent proteins?

Tissue clearing period

Advantages

Limitations

Thick sections (100–150µm)56,57,58,59,60

Bone marrow, spleen, muscle, heart, gut, skin, lung, etc.

Yes

Yes

Not applicable

Simple to implement; inexpensive; reduces background signals; non-toxic

Spatial information is limited; difficult to study rare populations

BABB4,29,67,71,76,88

Bone marrow, spleen, muscle, heart, gut, skin, lung, etc.

Yes

Yes

Not applicable

Simple to implement; inexpensive; reduces background signals; non-toxic

Spatial information is limited; difficult to study rare populations

PEGASOS77

Bones, brain, muscles, heart, lung, kidney, liver, pancreas, spleen, muscle, stomach, intestine, skin

Yes

Yes

~12–14 days for hard tissues, ~7 days for soft tissues

Strong clearing capability for both soft and hard tissues; no need to immunostain endogenous fluorescent proteins

Soft tissues undergo variable shrinkage; complicated protocol

Eci65,89,90,91

Kidney, heart, calvarial and long bones

Yes

No

~3 days

Non-toxic clearing reagent

Difficult long-term storage

iDISCO38,66,70,74,78

Brain, heart, vertebral arteries, lung, liver, prostate

Yes

No fluorescence is quenched

>3 h for small organs, 1–2 weeks for the whole mouse embryo and complex adult organs

Strong clearing capability for soft tissues

Toxic and thus careful handling is required; tissues are fragile; not all epitopes are applicable; soft tissues undergo shrinkage

Bone CLARITY75

Bone

Yes

Yes

28 days

Imaging depth of up to 1.5 mm for the epiphysis of long bones; integrity of the bone marrow is retained

Poor penetration of relatively large antibodies