Table 4 A comparison of several methods for generating optically clear tissues for immunofluorescence staining
From: Deep imaging of LepR+ stromal cells in optically cleared murine bone hemisections
Method | Applicable tissues | Compatible with immunostaining? | Preservation of endogenous fluorescent proteins? | Tissue clearing period | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bone marrow, spleen, muscle, heart, gut, skin, lung, etc. | Yes | Yes | Not applicable | Simple to implement; inexpensive; reduces background signals; non-toxic | Spatial information is limited; difficult to study rare populations | |
Bone marrow, spleen, muscle, heart, gut, skin, lung, etc. | Yes | Yes | Not applicable | Simple to implement; inexpensive; reduces background signals; non-toxic | Spatial information is limited; difficult to study rare populations | |
PEGASOS77 | Bones, brain, muscles, heart, lung, kidney, liver, pancreas, spleen, muscle, stomach, intestine, skin | Yes | Yes | ~12–14 days for hard tissues, ~7 days for soft tissues | Strong clearing capability for both soft and hard tissues; no need to immunostain endogenous fluorescent proteins | Soft tissues undergo variable shrinkage; complicated protocol |
Kidney, heart, calvarial and long bones | Yes | No | ~3 days | Non-toxic clearing reagent | Difficult long-term storage | |
Brain, heart, vertebral arteries, lung, liver, prostate | Yes | No fluorescence is quenched | >3 h for small organs, 1–2 weeks for the whole mouse embryo and complex adult organs | Strong clearing capability for soft tissues | Toxic and thus careful handling is required; tissues are fragile; not all epitopes are applicable; soft tissues undergo shrinkage | |
Bone CLARITY75 | Bone | Yes | Yes | 28 days | Imaging depth of up to 1.5 mm for the epiphysis of long bones; integrity of the bone marrow is retained | Poor penetration of relatively large antibodies |