Correction to: British Journal of Cancer (2019) 120, 88-96; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0298-0, published online 31 October 2018
The original version of this article contained an error in Fig. 1b. The third row should have been labelled as “PD-1” instead of “PD-L1”. The correct figure is below.
a Western blot assay revealed positive immunostaining for PD-1 in MIAPaCa-2 and PANC-1 cells. Jurkat cells and PD-1 overexpression cell lysate were used as positive controls. Negative control was empty vector cell lysate. ß-actin was used for loading control. b Immunofluorescent staining was performed for PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in MIAPaCa-2 and PANC-1 cells. Positive PD-1 and PD-L1 immunostaining was observed in both cell lines. Merged images with DAPI nuclear stains were also constructed for both PD-1 and PD-L1. c Immunofluorescence was performed to assess expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in 3 PDAC PDOs. PD-1 and PD-L1 immunostaining was observed for both patients 1 and 3. However, PD-1 immunostaining was absent in PDOs from patient 2. The second row was a merge with DAPI nuclear staining.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, M., Lin, M., Moffitt, R.A. et al. Correction: Direct therapeutic targeting of immune checkpoint PD-1 in pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 123, 495 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0879-6
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0879-6
