Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Decoding BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation: a new frontier in understanding sporadic breast cancer

Abstract

The role of epimutations in sporadic oncogenesis has been a hot topic of debate and speculation, as hereditary mutations account for merely 5–10% of cancers. One such epimutation, BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation (BPM), is associated with BRCA1 inactivation at variable frequencies in sporadic breast cancers. Unlike hereditary BRCA1 mutations, the role of BPM in tumorigenesis remains obscure. To investigate this, we employed a modified CRISPR approach to induce site-specific methylations in the wild-type BRCA1 promoter, mimicking BPM under clinical conditions. Our research revealed complex pathways influenced by BPM that accelerate tumor formation and progression. We found that BPM downregulates BRCA1 by modulating ER-α expression, thus affecting the balance between BRCA1 isoforms β and α. BPM also regulates the lncRNA NBR2, which shares the BRCA1 promoter region. Remarkably, silencing NBR2 initiates a feedback loop that exacerbates BRCA1 downregulation and supports tumorigenesis. Shortly after BPM induction, tumor proliferation is enhanced by increased β-hCG and ER-α expression, alongside decreased PR levels. However, prolonged BPM maintenance leads to the remodulation of hormone receptors, resulting in a hormone receptor-negative status. Finally, we demonstrate the higher growth potential and invasiveness of BPM tumors through novel hypermethylation-based xenograft models. Comparative proteomic analysis of BPM cells at two different timepoints post-methylation induction identified diagnostic and prognostic markers. Key molecular biomarkers, including NBR2, β-hCG, ER-α, and associated proteins such as HSP90, STAT1, SPEN, and TFF1, have been identified as potential therapeutic targets for BRCA1-defective breast cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Generation of stable BPM leads to downregulation of BRCA1.
Fig. 2: BPM leads to BRCA1 downregulation via modulation of BRCA1 transcriptional isoforms.
Fig. 3: BPM leads to NBR2 downregulation, activating a feedback loop and causes β-hCG induction.
Fig. 4: BPM modulates hormone receptors to support both cell proliferation and transformation to hormone receptor negative phenotype.
Fig. 5: Comparative proteomic analysis reveals key differences between methylation timelines.
Fig. 6: ER-α controls the regulation of alternate BRCA1 transcripts in BPM and knockdown cells.
Fig. 7: Xenograft tumors from BPM-induced cells demonstrate higher growth and invasiveness.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All Proteomics data and details of shRNAs and sgRNAs, plasmids, and generated cell lines in this experiment are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

References

  1. Thompson ME, Jensen RA, Obermiller PS, Page DL, Holt JT. Decreased expression of BRCA1 accelerates growth and is often present during sporadic breast cancer progression. Nat Genet. 1995;9:444–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lonning PE, Nikolaienko O, Pan K, Kurian AW, Eikesdal HP, Pettinger M, et al. Constitutional BRCA1 methylation and risk of incident triple-negative breast cancer and high-grade serous ovarian cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:1579–87.

  3. Prajzendanc K, Domagala P, Hybiak J, Rys J, Huzarski T, Szwiec M, et al. BRCA1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood is associated with the risk of triple-negative breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2020;146:1293–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oey H, Whitelaw E. On the meaning of the word ‘epimutation’. Trends Genet. 2014;30:519–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nikolaienko O, Eikesdal HP, Ognedal E, Gilje B, Lundgren S, Blix ES, et al. Prenatal BRCA1 epimutations contribute significantly to triple-negative breast cancer development. Genome Med. 2023;15:104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Moghrabi N, Al-Showimi M, Al-Yousef N, Al-Shahrani B, Karakas B, Alghofaili L, et al. Methylation of BRCA1 and MGMT genes in white blood cells are transmitted from mothers to daughters. Clin Epigenetics. 2018;10:99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta S, Jaworska-Bieniek K, Narod SA, Lubinski J, Wojdacz TK, Jakubowska A. Methylation of the BRCA1 promoter in peripheral blood DNA is associated with triple-negative and medullary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;148:615–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Esteller M, Silva JM, Dominguez G, Bonilla F, Matias-Guiu X, Lerma E, et al. Promoter hypermethylation and BRCA1 inactivation in sporadic breast and ovarian tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:564–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rice JC, Ozcelik H, Maxeiner P, Andrulis I, Futscher BW. Methylation of the BRCA1 promoter is associated with decreased BRCA1 mRNA levels in clinical breast cancer specimens. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:1761–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei M, Grushko TA, Dignam J, Hagos F, Nanda R, Sveen L, et al. BRCA1 promoter methylation in sporadic breast cancer is associated with reduced BRCA1 copy number and chromosome 17 aneusomy. Cancer Res. 2005;65:10692–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalachand RD, Stordal B, Madden S, Chandler B, Cunningham J, Goode EL, et al. BRCA1 promoter methylation and clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020;112:1190–203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Glodzik D, Bosch A, Hartman J, Aine M, Vallon-Christersson J, Reutersward C, et al. Comprehensive molecular comparison of BRCA1 hypermethylated and BRCA1 mutated triple-negative breast cancers. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3747.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu Y, Diao L, Chen Y, Liu Y, Wang C, Ouyang T, et al. Promoter methylation of BRCA1 in triple-negative breast cancer predicts sensitivity to adjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1498–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamashita N, Tokunaga E, Kitao H, Hitchins M, Inoue Y, Tanaka K, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of BRCA1 through promoter hypermethylation and its clinical importance in triple-negative breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015;15:498–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu X, Shan L, Wang F, Wang J, Wang F, Shen G, et al. Hypermethylation of BRCA1 gene: implications for prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in sporadic primary triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;150:479–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Menghi F, Banda K, Kumar P, Straub R, Dobrolecki L, Rodriguez IV, et al. Genomic and epigenomic BRCA alterations predict adaptive resistance and response to platinum-based therapy in patients with triple-negative breast and ovarian carcinomas. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14:eabn1926.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacot W, Lopez-Crapez E, Mollevi C, Boissiere-Michot F, Simony-Lafontaine J, Ho-Pun-Cheung A, et al. BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation is associated with good prognosis and chemosensitivity in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:828.

  18. Lips EH, Mulder L, Oonk A, van der Kolk LE, Hogervorst FB, Imholz AL, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: BRCAness and concordance of clinical features with BRCA1-mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:2172–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Foedermayr M, Sebesta M, Rudas M, Berghoff AS, Promberger R, Preusser M, et al. BRCA-1 methylation and TP53 mutation in triple-negative breast cancer patients without pathological complete response to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;73:771–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li D, Harlan-Williams LM, Kumaraswamy E, Jensen RA. BRCA1-No matter how you splice it. Cancer Res. 2019;79:2091–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sobczak K, Krzyzosiak WJ. Structural determinants of BRCA1 translational regulation. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:17349–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu CF, Chambers JA, Solomon E. Complex regulation of the BRCA1 gene. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:20994–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu X, Xiao ZD, Han L, Zhang J, Lee SW, Wang W, et al. LncRNA NBR2 engages a metabolic checkpoint by regulating AMPK under energy stress. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18:431–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiao ZD, Liu X, Zhuang L, Gan B. NBR2: a former junk gene emerges as a key player in tumor suppression. Mol Cell Oncol. 2016;3:e1187322.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dimitrov SD, Matouskova E, Forejt J. Expression of BRCA1, NBR1 and NBR2 genes in human breast cancer cells. Folia Biol. 2001;47:120–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Luo S, Lu JY, Liu L, Yin Y, Chen C, Han X, et al. Divergent lncRNAs regulate gene expression and lineage differentiation in pluripotent cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:637–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Garcia-Casado Z, Romero I, Fernandez-Serra A, Rubio L, Llopis F, Garcia A, et al. A de novo complete BRCA1 gene deletion identified in a Spanish woman with early bilateral breast cancer. BMC Med Genet. 2011;12:134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Varghese GR, Patra D, Jaikumar VS, Rajan A, Latha NR, Srinivas P. βhCG mediates immune suppression through upregulation of CD11b(+) Gr1(+) myeloid derived suppressor cells, CD206(+) M2 macrophages, and CD4(+) FOXP3(+) regulatory T-cells in BRCA1 deficient breast cancers. Immunology. 2023;170:270–85.

  29. Rajan A, Nadhan R, Latha NR, Krishnan N, Warrier AV, Srinivas P. Deregulated estrogen receptor signaling and DNA damage response in breast tumorigenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021;1875:188482.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sengodan SK, Rajan A, Hemalatha SK, Nadhan R, Jaleel A, Srinivas P. Proteomic profiling of beta-hCG-induced spheres in BRCA1-defective triple-negative breast cancer cells. J Proteome Res. 2018;17:276–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jia Z, Liang Y, Ma B, Xu X, Xiong J, Duan L, et al. A 5-mC Dot blot assay quantifying the DNA methylation level of chondrocyte dedifferentiation in vitro. J Vis Exp. 2017:55565. https://doi.org/10.3791/55565.

  32. Sengodan SK, Nadhan R, Nair RS, Hemalatha SK, Somasundaram V, Sushama RR, et al. BRCA1 regulation on beta-hCG: a mechanism for tumorigenicity in BRCA1 defective breast cancer. Oncogenesis. 2017;6:e376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Sengodan SK, Hemalatha SK, Nadhan R, Somanathan T, Mathew AP, Chil A, et al. beta-hCG-induced mutant BRCA1 ignites drug resistance in susceptible breast tissue. Carcinogenesis. 2019;40:1415–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Varghese GR, Jaikumar VS, Rajan A, Latha NR, Patra D, Srinivas P. Abstract A57: βhCG regulates immune cell population in BRCA1 mutated breast cancers. Cancer Immunol Res. 2020;8:(3_Supplement):B91.

  35. Nadhan R, Vaman JV, Sengodan SK, Hemalatha SK, Nirmala C, Sadasivan S, et al. BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation in human placenta: a hidden link with beta-hCG expression. Carcinogenesis. 2019;41:611–24.

  36. Wang D, Wang F, Kong X, Li Q, Shi H, Zhao S, et al. The role of metabolic reprogramming in cancer metastasis and potential mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine intervention. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;153:113376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nagaraja GM, Kaur P, Asea A. Role of human and mouse HspB1 in metastasis. Curr Mol Med. 2012;12:1142–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zheng ZY, Tian L, Bu W, Fan C, Gao X, Wang H, et al. Wild-Type N-Ras, overexpressed in basal-like breast cancer, promotes tumor formation by inducing IL-8 secretion via Jak2 activation. Cell Rep. 2015;12:511–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Tornillo G, Knowlson C, Kendrick H, Cooke J, Mirza H, Aurrekoetxea-Rodriguez I, et al. Dual mechanisms of LYN kinase dysregulation drive aggressive behavior in breast cancer cells. Cell Rep. 2018;25:3674–92.e10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Boutros R, Byrne JA. D53 (TPD52L1) is a cell cycle-regulated protein maximally expressed at the G2-M transition in breast cancer cells. Exp Cell Res. 2005;310:152–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wrighton KH, Lin X, Feng XH. Critical regulation of TGFbeta signaling by Hsp90. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:9244–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Chan SR, Vermi W, Luo J, Lucini L, Rickert C, Fowler AM, et al. STAT1-deficient mice spontaneously develop estrogen receptor alpha-positive luminal mammary carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Shen SX, Weaver Z, Xu X, Li C, Weinstein M, Chen L, et al. A targeted disruption of the murine Brca1 gene causes gamma-irradiation hypersensitivity and genetic instability. Oncogene. 1998;17:3115–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fan S, Wang J, Yuan R, Ma Y, Meng Q, Erdos MR, et al. BRCA1 inhibition of estrogen receptor signaling in transfected cells. Science. 1999;284:1354–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Simoes BM, Piva M, Iriondo O, Comaills V, Lopez-Ruiz JA, Zabalza I, et al. Effects of estrogen on the proportion of stem cells in the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;129:23–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ceppi P, Hadji A, Kohlhapp FJ, Pattanayak A, Hau A, Liu X, et al. CD95 and CD95L promote and protect cancer stem cells. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Du L, Wang L, Gan J, Yao Z, Lin W, Li J, et al. MTA3 represses cancer stemness by targeting the SOX2OT/SOX2 axis. iScience. 2019;22:353–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang W, Zheng Z, Yi P, Wang S, Zhang N, Ming J, et al. LncRNA NBR2 inhibits the malignancy of thyroid cancer, associated with enhancing the AMPK signaling. Front Oncol. 2020;10:956.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu X, Gan B. lncRNA NBR2 modulates cancer cell sensitivity to phenformin through GLUT1. Cell Cycle. 2016;15:3471–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Beaver JA, Gustin JP, Yi KH, Rajpurohit A, Thomas M, Gilbert SF, et al. PIK3CA and AKT1 mutations have distinct effects on sensitivity to targeted pathway inhibitors in an isogenic luminal breast cancer model system. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:5413–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Ma J, Dong D, Qi H, Li J, Yu H, Hu X, et al. LARP1, an RNA-binding protein, participates in ovarian cancer cell survival by regulating mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in response to the influence of the PI3K/mTOR pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2024;1870:167453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Morrison Joly M, Hicks DJ, Jones B, Sanchez V, Estrada MV, Young C, et al. Rictor/mTORC2 drives progression and therapeutic resistance of HER2-amplified breast cancers. Cancer Res. 2016;76:4752–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Iizuka K, Bruick RK, Liang G, Horton JD, Uyeda K. Deficiency of carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP) reduces lipogenesis as well as glycolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:7281–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Khaket TP, Rimal S, Wang X, Bhurtel S, Wu YC, Lu B. Ribosome stalling during c-myc translation presents actionable cancer cell vulnerability. PNAS Nexus. 2024;3:pgae321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Trefts E, Shaw RJ. AMPK: restoring metabolic homeostasis over space and time. Mol Cell. 2021;81:3677–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Harvey RF, Poyry TAA, Stoneley M, Willis AE. Signaling from mTOR to eIF2alpha mediates cell migration in response to the chemotherapeutic doxorubicin. Sci Signal. 2019;12:eaaw6763.

  57. Matsuo H, Maruo T, Hoshina M, Mochizuki M. [Selective inhibition of synthesis and secretion of hCG by progesterone and its correlation with hCG (alpha, beta) mRNA levels]. Nihon Naibunpi Gakkai Zasshi. 1985;61:882–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Patani N, Martin LA, Dowsett M. Biomarkers for the clinical management of breast cancer: international perspective. Int J Cancer. 2013;133:1–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Utsumi T, Kobayashi N, Hikichi M, Ushimado K, Kuroda M. Negative progesterone receptor status correlates with increased risk of breast cancer recurrence in luminal B HER2-positive and -negative subtypes. Fujita Med J. 2021;7:130–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Huang B, Omoto Y, Iwase H, Yamashita H, Toyama T, Coombes RC, et al. Differential expression of estrogen receptor alpha, beta1, and beta2 in lobular and ductal breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:1933–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Gruvberger-Saal SK, Bendahl PO, Saal LH, Laakso M, Hegardt C, Eden P, et al. Estrogen receptor beta expression is associated with tamoxifen response in ERalpha-negative breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1987–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Hopp TA, Weiss HL, Parra IS, Cui Y, Osborne CK, Fuqua SA. Low levels of estrogen receptor beta protein predict resistance to tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:7490–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Honma N, Horii R, Iwase T, Saji S, Younes M, Takubo K, et al. Clinical importance of estrogen receptor-beta evaluation in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3727–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Gorrini C, Gang BP, Bassi C, Wakeham A, Baniasadi SP, Hao Z, et al. Estrogen controls the survival of BRCA1-deficient cells via a PI3K-NRF2-regulated pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:4472–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Legare S, Chabot C, Basik M. SPEN, a new player in primary cilia formation and cell migration in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19:104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang Y, Liu Z. STAT1 in cancer: friend or foe?. Discov Med. 2017;24:19–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Yi J, Ren L, Li D, Wu J, Li W, Du G, et al. Trefoil factor 1 (TFF1) is a potential prognostic biomarker with functional significance in breast cancers. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;124:109827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Prieske K, Prieske S, Joosse SA, Trillsch F, Grimm D, Burandt E, et al. Loss of BRCA1 promotor hypermethylation in recurrent high-grade ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:83063–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Li CM, Cordes A, Oliphant MUJ, Quinn SA, Thomas M, Selfors LM, et al. Brca1 haploinsufficiency promotes early tumor onset and epigenetic alterations in a mouse model of hereditary breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2024;56:2763–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. McDonald JI, Celik H, Rois LE, Fishberger G, Fowler T, Rees R, et al. Reprogrammable CRISPR/Cas9-based system for inducing site-specific DNA methylation. Biol Open. 2016;5:866–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Shukla V, Coumoul X, Lahusen T, Wang RH, Xu X, Vassilopoulos A, et al. BRCA1 affects global DNA methylation through regulation of DNMT1. Cell Res. 2010;20:1201–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by CSIR [Sanction Order No 37WS (0059)/2023-24/EMR-II/ASPIRE], University Grants Commission (UGC) India [482/OBC (CSIR UGC NET DEC. 2016)], DBT [00461], CSIR [09/716(0162)/2015-EMR-I], DST-SERB [DST-INSPIRE/03/2014/000159], UGC [958/(CSIR UGC NET DEC. 2016)], and DST-SERB [PDF/2015/00467]. We thank the Bio-imaging facility, Genomics facility, Animal Research facility, and Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Core facility of Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram, for their help and support in carrying out the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DP—Writing—conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis, data curation, original draft, software. GRV—Formal analysis. VSJ—In vitro xenograft experiments. AR—DNA damage repair assays, data analysis. NK—Results interpretation. KK—Tissue pathology examination. RKT—CRISPR studies conceptualization based. PS—Conceptualization, supervision, resources, project administration, review, and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priya Srinivas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

All animal experiments were performed with the approval and according to the guidelines of Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) (Protocol No. IAEC/807/PRY/2020). All in vitro experiments were performed with approval and according to the guidelines of Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBSC), RGCB.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patra, D., Varghese, G.R., Jaikumar, V.S. et al. Decoding BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation: a new frontier in understanding sporadic breast cancer. Cancer Gene Ther 32, 1400–1413 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-025-00969-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-025-00969-7

Search

Quick links