Fig. 5: Reverse correlation between MAML1 and Itch in TNBC. | Cell Death & Differentiation

Fig. 5: Reverse correlation between MAML1 and Itch in TNBC.

From: MAML1 drives Notch and Hedgehog oncogenic pathways by inhibiting Itch activity in triple-negative breast cancer

Fig. 5

Overall Survival (OS) (A) and Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) (B) Kaplan-Meier curves in Triple Negative Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma patients (n = 261) from METABRIC database. Patients were stratified in two groups, High and Low MAML1/Notch1 (left panel) and MAML1/Gli1 (right panel) signature, based on the expression levels of the MAML1/Notch1 and MAML1/Gli1 signature, using the higher tertile as threshold. Statistical significance was assessed using the log-rank test. The pvalues and the number of patients in each group are shown. C Left panel: representative immunohistochemical staining (IHC) of MAML1 expression in primary and metastatic human TNBC, compared to healthy tissue (scale bar: 250 μm or 50 μm, as indicated in the panels). Immunohistochemistry for MAML1 shows different intensities of staining in human TNBC. Right panel: H-scores analysis for MAML1 immunohistochemical staining by one-tailed unpaired t test; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. D Representative immunoblot analysis of MAML1 in different TNBC cell lines, compared to non-tumorigenic cell line MCF10a. E In vitro ubiquitination assay of endogenous Itch in MDA-MB-436 and MDA-MB-231, upon small interference of MAML1 (±siMAML1). Immunoprecipitation of Itch with α-Itch antibody and immunoblotting for Ubiquitin to detect the Itch polyubiquitylated forms. α-Itch antibody was used to re-probe blots to assess the levels of immunoprecipitated protein. The lower panel shows the Pre-IP WCE by using α-MAML1 antibody. F PLA analysis by confocal microscope of MDA-MB-436 and MDA-MB-231, upon 48 h of MAML1 silencing (siMAML1), compared to control cells (siScr). Itch ubiquitination levels were detected using a couple of probes α-Itch antibody and α-Ub antibody. Red fluorescence indicates the endogenous levels of Itch ubiquitination. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. The right panels show the data, indicated as indicated as intensity mean value (scale bar: 10 μm). G Representative immunoblots for MAML1, Itch, Gli1, Notch1Val1744, Notch1, Vimentin, N-Cadherin, and PCNA of MDA-MB-436 and MDA-MB-231 upon small interference of MAML1 (±siMAML1). H Left panel: analysis of cell counts in MDA-MB-436 and MDA-MB-231, upon MAML1 silencing (siMAML1), compared to control cells (siScr). Right panel: analysis of MTS absorbance value (490 nm) in MDA-MB-436 and MDA-MB-231, upon MAML1 silencing (siMAML1), compared to control cells (siScr). Data in panel (F and H) represent Mean ± SEM of n = 3 (panel F and left panel H) and n = 5 (right panel H) independent experiments; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 calculated by two-tailed unpaired t test. Representative immunoblotting of n = 3 biological replicates with similar results are shown in (D, E, and G). Tubulin was used as loading control. The arrows indicate the molecular weight of the immunoprecipitated protein.

Back to article page