Fig. 6: Expression of SOX4, STAT6, p-STAT6, and MTHFD2 in HCC Specimens and Their Impact on Metabolomics and Drug Resistance.
From: SOX4-STAT6-MTHFD2 axis drives hepatocellular carcinoma progression and treatment resistance

A Western blot analysis of SOX4, p-STAT6 (Y641), STAT6, and MTHFD2 in paired normal (N) and tumor (T) tissues from 62 HCC patients. Representative data from 12 patients are shown; results for 50 additional samples are in Supplementart Fig. 3. β-actin was used as a loading control. Patients receiving TKIs, immunotherapy, or combination treatment are highlighted in red. B Quantification of protein band intensities using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), normalized to β-actin. Statistical significance: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. C Correlation analysis of protein expression levels. D Metabolomic analysis of SOX4/STAT6/MTHFD2high and SOX4/STAT6/MTHFD2low tumor samples (n = 21) using LC-MS. Differential metabolite abundance was analyzed with MetaboAnalyst 6.0 website (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/home.xhtml) [59]. The heatmap (left) shows log-ratio values, with red indicating upregulation and blue indicating downregulation. Identified metabolites are numbered 1-58 (right). The abundance of metabolites was showed in log10 value as scale bar. The sample number of clinical specimen was the same as the sample number present in Fig. 6A and Supplementary Fig. 3. E Clinical response and SOX4, STAT6, and MTHFD2 expression in 18 HCC specimens. Expression was normalized to β-actin, then further normalized as tumor/normal fold change. Colors indicate relative expressions (green to red). F Patient #6 (61 y/o male): Treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab for 9 cycles, achieving near-complete response at 6 months, with treatment cessation at 8 months. Patient #8 (45 y/o male): Progressed despite sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization.