Abstract
All living organisms on Earth have evolved mechanisms to counteract the effects of gravity. In space, however, shear forces, buoyancy-driven convection, and hydrostatic pressure are either eliminated or significantly reduced. Microgravity disrupts the balance between intracellular structures and external forces, leading to changes at both the cellular and subcellular levels. The absence of gravitational forces in microgravity significantly impacts cellular behavior, including changes in tumor cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and gene expression. Research has demonstrated that microgravity induces the three-dimensional aggregation of cancer cells into multicellular spheroids, which more closely resemble in vivo tumors. These spheroids exhibit altered behaviors, including increased apoptosis, autophagy, and reduced proliferation and migration. Such changes suggest that microgravity may offer a promising novel therapeutic approach for cancer treatment. However, the precise underlying mechanisms remain largely unexplored. This review examines current microgravity research platforms and explores how microgravity affects tumor cell molecular and biological behaviors, offering valuable insights into the potential for innovative cancer therapies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Facts
-
Microgravity profoundly reshapes the physical and biological behaviors of cancer cells, influencing their morphology, cytoskeletal organization, and gene expression.
-
The loss of gravitational forces promotes the formation of multicellular tumor spheroids that closely recapitulate the three-dimensional architecture of in vivo tumors.
-
Microgravity-induced alterations enhance apoptosis and autophagy while suppressing cell proliferation and migration.
-
Simulated microgravity platforms offer robust models for investigating tumor biology and identifying novel therapeutic targets.
-
Deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects may pave the way for the development of gravity-based anticancer strategies.
Introduction
Microgravity, a unique condition encountered in environments such as parabolic flights, orbiting spacecraft, and space station laboratories, has been a subject of increasing research since the early days of space exploration in the 1960s [1] (Fig. 1). Transitioning from Earth’s gravitational forces to a microgravity environment triggers significant physiological and cellular adaptations, affecting various bodily systems. Documented effects on astronauts in microgravity include osteoporosis, muscle atrophy, cardiac atrophy, increased intracranial pressure, immune system suppression, and cellular reorganization [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. These effects emphasize the importance of studying microgravity’s impact on health at the organ, tissue, cellular, and subcellular levels [10]. Typically, microgravity is considered detrimental to the human body, with various negative effects documented. However, this raises an intriguing question: Could microgravity environments also possess beneficial effects on the body?
A Model of the Tiangong space station laboratory. B Model of the International Space Station. C Model of the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft. D Model of the zero-gravity laboratory aboard the Airbus A300 ZERO-G aircraft by Novespace. E Launch site of Tianhe, the core module of China’s space station. F Model of the Shijian-10 recoverable satellite.
Recent research has expanded into exploring the effects of microgravity on cancer cells, revealing that the absence of gravity can influence tumor biology in profound ways. Cancer cells exposed to microgravity environments form three-dimensional multicellular spheroids, a model that more accurately mimics the structure of in vivo tumors compared to traditional two-dimensional cultures [11,12,13,14]. These spheroids exhibit altered biological behaviors, such as enhanced apoptosis, autophagy, and suppressed proliferation and migration, suggesting that microgravity may not only provide new insights into cancer progression but also hold potential as a novel therapeutic strategy [11,12,13, 15].
Cancer cells can proliferate uncontrollably and metastasize to distant organs, leading to severe impacts on human health due to their high morbidity and mortality rates [16,17,18]. As a leading cause of death, cancer underscores the urgent need for innovative treatment strategies. Microgravity, by influencing cellular and molecular processes, offers a new frontier in cancer research [19]. This review explores current microgravity research platforms, the molecular mechanisms driving cancer cell behavior in microgravity, and the potential of microgravity-based therapies to improve treatment outcomes.
Microgravity research platforms and equipment
Microgravity environments are typically classified as real or simulated [20]. Real microgravity refers to the sustained weightlessness experienced aboard space stations, while short-term microgravity is achieved during space flights, satellite missions, and spacecraft operations. However, challenges such as radiation interference and high operational costs limit the ability to conduct extensive microgravity research in these environments. To overcome these limitations, researchers have developed ground-based devices that simulate microgravity, aiming to replicate the physiological responses observed in space [21].
Simulated microgravity is commonly achieved through methods such as animal hindlimb unloading, human head-down tilt bed rest, and three-dimensional cell rotation systems [22]. The hindlimb unloading method is widely acknowledged as an effective animal model for simulating microgravity [23, 24], enabling the replication of spaceflight-induced weightlessness effects on various physiological systems [23, 25,26,27]. For cellular studies, two primary devices are used: the Random Positioning Machine (RPM) (Fig. 2A) [28], and the Rotating Wall Vessel (RWV), including NASA’s Rotating Cell Culture System (RCCS) (Fig. 2B) [29]. The RPM simulates microgravity by averaging the gravity vector to near zero through random movement [30], while the RWV and RCCS simulate microgravity by continuously rotating the vessel, neutralizing directional gravity forces to partially replicate the conditions of a space station (Fig. 2C) [31].
A Random Positioning Machine (RPM), which averages gravitational vectors to simulate microgravity. B Rotating Wall Vessel (RWV), including the Rotating Cell Culture System (RCCS), where continuous rotation counteracts gravitational directionality to simulate a microgravity environment. C Diagram illustrating the comparison between normal gravity (left), simulated microgravity (center), and real microgravity (right), showing the effects of gravity on cellular behavior in different environments.
Effects of microgravity on cellular cytoskeleton and morphology
Effects of microgravity on cytoskeleton and morphology of cancer cells
Cells are highly responsive to variations in gravity, particularly through changes in their cytoskeletal architecture, which governs shape, adhesion, and mechanotransduction [32,33,34]. The cytoskeleton, composed of actin filaments, microtubules, and intermediate filaments, plays a fundamental role in maintaining cellular integrity, mobility, and intracellular signaling. Given its involvement in tumor proliferation, progression, and metastasis, understanding how microgravity alters cytoskeletal dynamics is crucial for both space biology and cancer research [32, 33].
Both simulated [35,36,37] and real microgravity [38,39,40,41] induce cytoskeletal reorganization, altering cellular morphology and function. These changes often involve disassembly and redistribution of cytoskeletal components, affecting mechanical stability and intracellular signaling. For example, cytoskeletal alterations in Ewing’s sarcoma cells persist for at least 24 h after exposure to simulated microgravity, demonstrating the long-term impact of gravitational changes on cell structure [42]. Similarly, human breast, lung, and thyroid cancer cells tend to form three-dimensional aggregates or multicellular spheroids under microgravity conditions, which is linked to cytoskeletal rearrangements and gene expression changes [43,44,45,46].
A key structural transition involves actin filaments shifting from a longitudinal to a spherical arrangement in human lung and breast cancer cells [45, 46]. This phenomenon aligns with Ingber’s tensegrity model, which suggests that cellular architecture is maintained through a balance of tensile and compressive forces in the cytoskeleton [41, 45]. Disruptions in this balance can lead to altered adhesion, signaling pathways, and tumor progression [41, 45]. Data from both benign and malignant tumor types exposed to short-term microgravity further support this theory, demonstrating that microgravity-induced cytoskeletal disruption may play a role in tumor progression [46,47,48,49].
Tumor cells undergo significant morphological remodeling in microgravity, primarily through disruptions in adhesion followed by reorganization into spheroids [50, 51]. This restructuring correlates with actin filament accumulation, which shifts from an elongated alignment under normal gravity to a compact, spherical arrangement under microgravity [43, 50]. Disruptions in microfilaments and microtubules affect key cellular processes, including proliferation, DNA repair, and invasion [37, 52, 53]. Notably, actin filaments play an essential role in mitotic spindle formation, and their rearrangement under microgravity can impair cell division and decrease proliferation rates [54,55,56].
Distinct cancer cell lines exhibit unique cytoskeletal responses to microgravity. MCF-7 breast cancer cells display cytoskeletal alterations under simulated microgravity, suggesting significant reorganization of actin and microtubules [43]. FTC-133 thyroid cancer cells develop filamentous and lamellar structures in both real and simulated microgravity, indicating structural adaptations to the microenvironment [46]. A431 epidermoid carcinoma cells show a rapid increase in microfilament levels within just 7 min of exposure to real microgravity, highlighting the immediate cytoskeletal response [57].
These findings underscore the cytoskeleton’s role in tumor adaptation under microgravity and suggest that targeting cytoskeletal remodeling could be a promising avenue for future cancer therapies [58]. Given that microgravity conditions mimic aspects of tumor metastasis, understanding how cytoskeletal disruptions affect tumor behavior may inform novel therapeutic strategies, particularly for drug-resistant cancers.
Effects of microgravity on cytoskeleton and morphology of immune cells
Microgravity conditions have been shown to significantly impact the immune system, potentially altering the responsiveness of immune cells to immunotherapies. The immune system is compromised under microgravity, as evidenced by various studies. For instance, microgravity has been found to impair DNA damage repair in human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, which are crucial for generating immune cells necessary for an effective antitumor response [59]. Furthermore, microgravity has been observed to disrupt the signaling pathways in immune cells, such as the NFκB signaling in dendritic cells, which are vital for initiating immune responses [60]. This disruption leads to a less mature dendritic cell phenotype and impaired ability to induce T cell activation, which could hinder the effectiveness of immunotherapies that depend on dendritic cell function [60]. The impact of microgravity on T cells, which are central to many immunotherapies, is also notable. Studies have shown that microgravity can suppress T cell activation and proliferation, which are critical processes for the success of immunotherapies targeting cancer and infectious diseases [61, 62]. This suppression is linked to alterations in cytokine production and signaling pathways within T cells [61, 62]. Moreover, macrophages exhibit altered cytokine secretion and impaired ability to present antigens under microgravity conditions, which could affect the outcome of immunotherapies [63, 64]. Additionally, microgravity-induced alterations in immune cell metabolism and bioactive lipid signaling have been documented. These changes can influence the immune system’s overall homeostasis and responsiveness to therapeutic interventions, including immunotherapies [65]. Lastly, the combined effects of microgravity and other space-related stressors, such as radiation, further complicate immune cell function. This combination can lead to a more pronounced immune suppression, potentially reducing the efficacy of immunotherapies during space missions or in simulated microgravity environments on Earth [66].
These evidences suggest that microgravity conditions can significantly alter immune cell function and responsiveness, which may impact the effectiveness of immunotherapies. Understanding these changes is crucial for developing strategies to mitigate the adverse effects of microgravity on the immune system, especially for astronauts and individuals exposed to similar conditions.
Effects of microgravity on cytoskeleton and morphology of other cell types
Microgravity has been shown to significantly affect the cytoskeletal structure and morphology of other cell types, including fibroblasts and endothelial cells. In fibroblasts, exposure to simulated microgravity conditions can lead to alterations in the cytoskeleton, extracellular matrix, focal adhesion, and growth factors. For instance, juvenile normal human dermal fibroblasts grown under simulated microgravity exhibit changes in the expression of proteins such as fibronectin, laminin, and collagen, which are crucial for maintaining cell structure and function [67]. These changes are indicative of the fibroblasts’ adaptation to the microgravity environment, which may have implications for tissue engineering and wound healing [67].
Endothelial cells, which are highly sensitive to mechanical forces, also undergo significant changes in microgravity. Studies have shown that microgravity can lead to the depolymerization of actin filaments and microtubules in endothelial cells, affecting their morphology and function [35, 68]. These changes can influence the cells’ ability to regulate vascular homeostasis and respond to inflammatory stimuli. For example, endothelial cells exposed to microgravity show altered expression of adhesion molecules and cytokines, which are critical for maintaining vascular integrity and function [35, 68]. Furthermore, the cytoskeletal remodeling in endothelial cells under microgravity conditions can mimic the effects of mechanical disruption, such as that induced by cytochalasin D [69]. This suggests that the cytoskeleton plays a fundamental role in sensing and responding to gravitational changes, which can have downstream effects on cell signaling and function [69]. Additionally, microgravity-induced changes in endothelial cells can affect their migration and permeability, which are vital for vascular repair and function [70].
Overall, the impact of microgravity on the cytoskeletal structure and morphology of fibroblasts and endothelial cells highlights the importance of understanding these changes for space travel and potential applications in tumor medicine and tissue engineering.
Impact of microgravity on the biological behavior of cancer cells
Exposure to microgravity leads to significant changes in both the structure and function of cancer cells. Under microgravity conditions, adherent cancer cells detach from the culture surface and aggregate into three-dimensional multicellular spheroids [11, 12, 15]. These spheroids display distinct morphological changes and modified cellular behaviors [43,44,45,46]. Unlike normal cells, cancer cells under microgravity exhibit altered differentiation, adhesion, focal adhesion, apoptosis, proliferation, migration, and cell cycle regulation [52, 71, 72]. Microgravity regulates key gene expression pathways in cancer cells, potentially influencing tumorigenesis and offering novel avenues for anticancer strategies [73, 74].
Hypotheses on the effect of microgravity on tumor cell biological behavior
Although the behavioral changes in tumor cells under microgravity are widely accepted, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Several hypotheses have been proposed to elucidate how microgravity influences the biological behavior of tumor cells.
Cytoskeletal reorganization hypothesis
One widely supported hypothesis is that microgravity induces significant changes in the cytoskeleton—a critical structural network that maintains cell shape and mechanical stability [36, 75]. Disruptions in cytoskeletal integrity can disturb cellular mechanical equilibrium, leading to changes in cell morphology, mechanical properties, extracellular matrix (ECM) organization, and intracellular signaling pathways, ultimately resulting in functional alterations. These changes not only disturb normal cell behavior but may also facilitate tumor progression and metastasis [76,77,78].
Gravireceptor-mediated apoptosis hypothesis
Another hypothesis involves the potential presence of a gravireceptor—a proposed sensor within cells that detects mechanical unloading in microgravity. For certain tumor types, such as lung cancer, microgravity has been linked to increased cell death through the activation of apoptosis-regulating genes, including TP53, PTEN, and RB1 [50]. This hypothetical sensor may convert diminished mechanical stimuli into biochemical signals that initiate apoptotic pathways. If identified, such a receptor could serve as a target for therapeutic strategies aiming to trigger selective apoptosis in cancer cells [38, 45, 50].
Mitochondrial stress hypothesis
The mitochondrial stress model suggests that microgravity disrupts mitochondrial function, contributing to altered tumor cell behavior. Studies involving astronauts and Earth-bound twins have revealed that prolonged spaceflight is associated with increased oxidative stress and reduced antioxidant capacity, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction [79]. In microgravity, the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is enhanced, which promotes apoptosis [80]. In human promyelocytic leukemia cells, simulated microgravity has been shown to reduce mitochondrial membrane potential, thereby activating the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway [81]. Furthermore, mitochondrial stress may influence cellular metabolism, potentially affecting tumor cell proliferation, survival, and response to therapeutic treatment [82].
Apoptosis under microgravity
Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, plays a crucial role in processes such as embryonic development, tissue remodeling, and wound repair. It is tightly regulated by the interplay between proteins that either promote or inhibit cell death [83]. In cancer, this regulation is often disrupted, leading to reduced apoptotic activity and enabling tumor cells—including those in malignant gliomas—to persist and evade destruction [84]. As a result, restoring or enhancing apoptotic pathways represents a critical objective in improving cancer therapies [13].
Research has demonstrated that microgravity—both actual and simulated—can significantly influence apoptotic activity [85, 86] (Fig. 3). Numerous studies have reported that microgravity conditions can induce apoptosis in various cancer cell types [50, 54, 87,88,89]. For instance, simulated microgravity in human lung cancer cells via RPM induces apoptosis within 24 h [50]. Additionally, drug-resistant Jurkat/A4 cells exhibit greater sensitivity to simulated microgravity than wild-type Jurkat cells [90]. Moreover, spheroid cells grown in simulated microgravity show a significantly higher incidence of apoptosis than adherent cells [91]. Furthermore, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exposed to simulated microgravity promoted apoptosis when an anti-cancer vaccine was used in animal models [92]. The pro-apoptotic effects of microgravity appear to be mediated by its influence on key signaling pathways. These effects include the upregulation of apoptosis-associated proteins such as Bax, PARP, and p53, as well as caspase activation. At the same time, microgravity can suppress critical survival pathways, including those regulated by FAK/RhoA-driven mTORC1/NF-κB and ERK1/2 signaling [37, 71, 88]. This dual modulation of cell death and survival mechanisms positions microgravity as a promising experimental model for uncovering novel anti-cancer strategies.
Microgravity can alter the fate of cancer cells by promoting either apoptosis or autophagy, both of which may contribute to the suppression of tumor growth. During apoptosis, cells undergo shrinkage and fragment into apoptotic bodies, which are efficiently engulfed and removed by macrophages. In contrast, autophagy involves the encapsulation of damaged organelles and proteins within autophagosomes, which subsequently fuse with lysosomes to facilitate degradation. This process supports cellular homeostasis and may act as a barrier to cancer development.
Microgravity can still induce apoptosis in genetically altered cells. In glioma cells (U251MG), microgravity also induces apoptosis by modulating the expression of apoptosis-associated proteins such as p21 and IGFBP-2, which may offer new therapeutic targets for glioma treatment [54]. In addition, a review highlights the potential of microgravity to alter cell proliferation, apoptosis, and gene expression of glioma cells [93]. Similarly, microgravity conditions have been found to trigger DNA damage and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis through ROS generation in human promyelocytic leukemia cells, indicating a potential pathway through which microgravity exerts its effects [81]. Moreover, microgravity has been observed to influence the apoptotic pathways in melanoma cells by suppressing the Uev1A/TICAM/TRAF/NF-κB-regulated anti-apoptosis and p53/PCNA- and ATM/ATR-Chk1/2-controlled DNA-damage response pathways, further supporting its role in promoting apoptosis in cancer cells [37]. Overall, microgravity disrupts tumor cell proliferation and promotes programmed cell death, suggesting its potential in developing novel cancer therapies. For detailed effects across tumor types, refer to Table 1.
Microgravity-induced autophagy
A key obstacle in conventional cancer treatments is the ability of tumor cells to evade apoptosis [94]. Autophagy, a distinct form of programmed cell death, may offer alternative therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment [78, 94]. Studies suggest that microgravity can upregulate autophagy across various cell types, contributing to muscle atrophy, ocular pathogenesis, and other spaceflight-associated diseases [95,96,97]. Interestingly, targeting autophagy in cancer cells under microgravity could inspire new strategies for combating cancer.
Table 1 summarizes the effects of microgravity on apoptosis and autophagy in different human cancer cell lines. In human colorectal cancer cells (HCT116) cultured using a RCCS to simulate microgravity, autophagy was enhanced, as evidenced by increased ATG expression [98]. Similarly, hepatoblastoma cell lines subjected to simulated microgravity exhibited upregulation of LC3-II relative to LC3-I and a downregulation of mTOR expression, indicating autophagy activation [99]. Notably, these changes were also seen in hepatoblastoma cells expressing mutant p53, a key regulator of both apoptosis and autophagy [99]. Jeong et al. reported that Hodgkin’s lymphoma cells exposed to two days of simulated microgravity showed autophagy induction via the AMPK/Akt/mTOR and MAPK signaling cascades [100]. Furthermore, colorectal cancer cells formed spheroids after 6–8 hours of exposure to simulated microgravity in RCCS [15]. When returned to normal gravity, these spheroids displayed deregulated autophagy [15]. In seminoma TCam-2 cells, microgravity conditions promoted substantial autophagy activity and disrupted the organization of actin microfilaments [101].
Given this evidence, it is essential to investigate the triggers of tumor cell death under microgravity, particularly the interconnected roles of apoptosis and autophagy. Under physiological conditions, the crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis may be mediated through proteolytic cleavage of the transcription factor p53 or through interactions involving BCL2 family proteins at the BH3 domain, mechanisms possibly regulated by kinases such as JNK and DAPK2 [102]. Further research is needed to clarify how autophagy and apoptosis are interlinked under microgravity and to explore the molecular mechanisms at play. The structural features of apoptosis and autophagy observed in tumor cells exposed to microgravity are depicted in Fig. 3, while Fig. 4 illustrates their potential relationship under microgravity.
Microgravity can trigger cellular stress responses such as oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress, which may lead to the activation of autophagy, potentially mediated by ATG [15, 98, 123]. Additionally, microgravity influences mitochondrial function, particularly by increasing the permeability of the mitochondrial outer membrane. This can cause the release of cytochrome c, a critical event in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, which is regulated by key proteins such as caspases, Bax, and Bak [11, 48, 81, 99, 118]. Under standard physiological conditions, apoptosis and autophagy generally act in opposition to maintain cellular balance. However, in microgravity, their relationship appears more complex [102]. Crosstalk between these pathways may be facilitated by mechanisms such as proteolytic cleavage of the transcription factor p53 or through interactions between BCL2 family proteins and the BH3 domain [102]. These processes may also be influenced by signaling pathways involving kinases like JNK and DAPK2 [102].
Impact of microgravity on the cell cycle
Microgravity has been found to significantly affect the cell cycle in cancer cells, primarily by impairing mitochondrial function, disrupting normal progression, and suppressing cellular proliferation [103]. Tumor cells cultured under simulated microgravity show distinct changes in the expression of proteins that regulate the cell cycle [71]. For instance, exposure to microgravity results in the downregulation of cyclin D1 and cyclin B1 in breast and colorectal cancer cells—two key regulators of cell cycle checkpoints [71]. In BL6-10 melanoma cells, reduced expression of ATR, ATM, and CDK1/2 during the transition from the S-phase to the G2-phase has been observed under microgravity conditions, which corresponds with a notable decline in the population of G2-phase cells [37]. Additionally, the PCNA-CDK-cyclin complex, a crucial component required for seamless progression through the cell cycle, is diminished in microgravity-exposed cells [104]. This downregulation is accompanied by increased levels of the P21 protein, a known inhibitor of DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression [104]. P21 can bind to PCNA, thereby inhibiting CDK function and arresting the cell cycle in the G1 phase [104]. Microgravity has also been shown to reduce the colony-forming ability of melanoma, colorectal, and leukemia cancer cell lines [37, 71]. These findings suggest that microgravity may hinder tumor cell proliferation and colony formation by modulating the expression of cell cycle-related genes and proteins.
Tumor cell adhesion in microgravity
Under normal gravity, epithelial-mesenchymal transition involves the loss of intercellular adhesion and enhanced interactions with the extracellular matrix (ECM) [105]. The ECM, adhesion molecules, and cytoskeleton components constitute a highly responsive network that adjusts to gravitational changes by modulating key signaling pathways [71]. Notably, changes in adhesion-related gene expression are among the earliest cellular responses to microgravity, preceding the onset of apoptosis. In real microgravity, human breast cancer cells exhibit rapid remodeling of adhesion and cytoskeletal proteins within six minutes, marked by a decline in E-cadherin levels, a molecule often associated with reduced metastatic potential [77].
Similarly, under simulated microgravity, both intercellular and focal adhesions are disrupted [106]. This is accompanied by inhibition of signaling pathways such as FAK, RhoA, and mTORC1, along with activation of the AMPK pathway, collectively contributing to decreased melanoma cell proliferation and metastatic behavior [107]. The suppression of cell adhesion under microgravity is further evidenced by reduced expression of adhesion markers like E-cadherin and integrin-β1 [106]. Proteomic studies in MCF-7 breast cancer cells have revealed downregulation of E-cadherin, claudin-3, and integrin-β4, along with reduced levels of their negative regulators, indicating that E-cadherin may be a key regulator of multicellular spheroid formation in microgravity [108]. These cellular adaptations likely represent responses to the abnormal mechanical environment of microgravity, in which altered external forces are translated into internal signals that affect cell morphology, adhesion properties, and cytoskeletal structure [106, 108]. The deregulation of adhesion-related proteins appears to play a central role in orchestrating these phenotypic changes [106].
Metabolic rewiring under microgravity
In human hepatic and biliary tree stem/progenitor cells, Costantini et al. demonstrated that the RCCS significantly enhances glycolytic metabolism [109]. Under RCCS-simulated microgravity conditions, metabolomic profiling of HGC-27 gastric cancer cells revealed paradoxical metabolic reprogramming. RCCS exposure promoted glycolytic flux while suppressing oxidative phosphorylation, suggesting potential inhibition of the Warburg effect in this specific tumor model [110]. Proteomic analysis of murine microgravity models further identified hyperactivation of rate-limiting glycolytic enzymes, including hexokinase and phosphofructokinase, driving enhanced glucose metabolism under SMG conditions [111]. However, the precise impact of SMG on tumor metabolism—particularly its regulatory effects on the Warburg effect—requires further validation through systematic investigations integrating multi-omics approaches and functional metabolic assays.
The future prospects and current dilemma of microgravity research
Microgravity presents exciting potential for future clinical applications, especially in areas such as wound repair, tissue regeneration, pharmaceutical development, and cancer therapy. As a novel experimental approach, it has produced encouraging early results, prompting increased interest in its role in regenerative medicine and innovative oncological treatments [13, 72, 112]. Despite these advancements, the practical use of microgravity in clinical settings remains in the early stages. Simulating microgravity requires sophisticated and costly equipment, and there is a scarcity of long-term studies to support its widespread application. Future progress in space technologies and biomedical research is expected to improve experimental systems and broaden their accessibility. To bridge the gap between laboratory research and clinical implementation, comprehensive preclinical studies—particularly those conducted aboard space platforms—will be critical. Establishing robust and scalable microgravity-based methodologies will be an important direction for translating this promising technology into healthcare solutions.
Conclusions
Microgravity provides a unique three-dimensional in vitro model that closely mimics the tumor microenvironment. Studies under microgravity have revealed critical insights into cancer cell behavior, including apoptosis, autophagy, adhesion, and cell cycle regulation. These findings challenge traditional research paradigms and suggest that microgravity could be instrumental in developing novel cancer therapies and prevention strategies. As research progresses, microgravity may become a vital tool in advancing cancer treatment and improving patient outcomes.
References
Krittanawong C, Singh NK, Scheuring RA, Urquieta E, Bershad EM, Macaulay TR, et al. Human Health during Space Travel: State-of-the-Art Review. Cells. 2022;12:40.
White RJ, Averner M. Humans in space. Nature. 2001;409:1115–8.
Farkas A, Farkas G. Effects of Spaceflight on Human Skin. Ski Pharm Physiol. 2021;34:239–45.
Genah S, Monici M, Morbidelli L. The Effect of Space Travel on Bone Metabolism: Considerations on Today’s Major Challenges and Advances in Pharmacology. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:4585.
Kim DS, Vaquer S, Mazzolai L, Roberts LN, Pavela J, Watanabe M, et al. The effect of microgravity on the human venous system and blood coagulation: a systematic review. Exp Physiol. 2021;106:1149–58.
Akiyama T, Horie K, Hinoi E, Hiraiwa M, Kato A, Maekawa Y, et al. How does spaceflight affect the acquired immune system? NPJ Microgravity. 2020;6:14.
Bateman GA, Bateman AR. A perspective on spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome causation secondary to elevated venous sinus pressure. NPJ Microgravity. 2022;8:3.
Lee PHU, Chung M, Ren Z, Mair DB, Kim DH. Factors mediating spaceflight-induced skeletal muscle atrophy. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2022;322:C567–C80.
Hart DA. Regulation of Bone by Mechanical Loading, Sex Hormones, and Nerves: Integration of Such Regulatory Complexity and Implications for Bone Loss during Space Flight and Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis. Biomolecules. 2023;13:1136.
Prasad B, Grimm D, Strauch SM, Erzinger GS, Corydon TJ, Lebert M, et al. Influence of Microgravity on Apoptosis in Cells, Tissues, and Other Systems In Vivo and In Vitro. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:9373.
Deng B, Liu R, Tian X, Han Z, Chen J. Simulated microgravity inhibits the viability and migration of glioma via FAK/RhoA/Rock and FAK/Nek2 signaling. Vitr Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2019;55:260–71.
Hybel TE, Dietrichs D, Sahana J, Corydon TJ, Nassef MZ, Wehland M, et al. Simulated Microgravity Influences VEGF, MAPK, and PAM Signaling in Prostate Cancer Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1263.
Grimm D, Schulz H, Kruger M, Cortes-Sanchez JL, Egli M, Kraus A, et al. The Fight against Cancer by Microgravity: The Multicellular Spheroid as a Metastasis Model. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:3073.
Dietrichs D, Grimm D, Sahana J, Melnik D, Corydon TJ, Wehland M, et al. Three-Dimensional Growth of Prostate Cancer Cells Exposed to Simulated Microgravity. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:841017.
Arun RP, Sivanesan D, Vidyasekar P, Verma RS. PTEN/FOXO3/AKT pathway regulates cell death and mediates morphogenetic differentiation of Colorectal Cancer Cells under Simulated Microgravity. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5952.
Gopaul CD, Singh A, Williams A, Ventour D, Thomas D. Cancer morbidity and mortality trends in Trinidad and Tobago (2008-2018). J Health Popul Nutr. 2023;42:58.
Jacobsen PB, Jim HS. Consideration of quality of life in cancer survivorship research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2011;20:2035–41.
Intlekofer AM, Finley LWS. Metabolic signatures of cancer cells and stem cells. Nat Metab. 2019;1:177–88.
Kim SC, Kim MJ, Park JW, Shin YK, Jeong SY, Kim S, et al. Effects of simulated microgravity on colorectal cancer organoids growth and drug response. Sci Rep. 2024;14:25526.
Andreeva E, Matveeva D, Zhidkova O, Zhivodernikov I, Kotov O, Buravkova L. Real and Simulated Microgravity: Focus on Mammalian Extracellular Matrix. Life (Basel). 2022;12:1343.
Shi L, Tian H, Wang P, Li L, Zhang Z, Zhang J, et al. Spaceflight and simulated microgravity suppresses macrophage development via altered RAS/ERK/NFkappaB and metabolic pathways. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18:1489–502.
Yan R, Liu H, Lv F, Deng Y, Li Y. Rac1/Wave2/Arp3 Pathway Mediates Rat Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction under Simulated Microgravity Based on Proteomics Strategy. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22.
Globus RK, Morey-Holton E. Hindlimb unloading: rodent analog for microgravity. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016;120:1196–206.
Grimm D. Microgravity and Space Medicine 2.0. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:4456.
Sarkar P, Sarkar S, Ramesh V, Hayes BE, Thomas RL, Wilson BL, et al. Proteomic analysis of mice hippocampus in simulated microgravity environment. J Proteome Res. 2006;5:548–53.
Wang Z, Wang XC, Chen YF, Wang CL, Chen L, Jiang MY, et al. Loss and recovery of myocardial mitochondria in mice under different tail suspension time: Apoptosis and mitochondrial fission, fusion and autophagy. Exp Physiol. 2023;108:1189–202.
Bellone JA, Gifford PS, Nishiyama NC, Hartman RE, Mao XW. Long-term effects of simulated microgravity and/or chronic exposure to low-dose gamma radiation on behavior and blood-brain barrier integrity. NPJ Microgravity. 2016;2:16019.
Benavides Damm T, Walther I, Wuest SL, Sekler J, Egli M. Cell cultivation under different gravitational loads using a novel random positioning incubator. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014;111:1180–90.
Klaus DM. Clinostats and bioreactors. Gravit Space Biol Bull. 2001;14:55–64.
Wuest SL, Richard S, Kopp S, Grimm D, Egli M. Simulated microgravity: critical review on the use of random positioning machines for mammalian cell culture. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:971474.
Hammond TG, Hammond JM. Optimized suspension culture: the rotating-wall vessel. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2001;281:F12–25.
Tran MT, Ho CNQ, Hoang SN, Doan CC, Nguyen MT, Van HD, et al. Morphological Changes of 3T3 Cells under Simulated Microgravity. Cells. 2024;13:344.
Kruger M, Melnik D, Kopp S, Buken C, Sahana J, Bauer J, et al. Fighting Thyroid Cancer with Microgravity Research. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:2553.
Najrana T, Sanchez-Esteban J. Mechanotransduction as an Adaptation to Gravity. Front Pediatr. 2016;4:140.
Janmaleki M, Pachenari M, Seyedpour SM, Shahghadami R, Sanati-Nezhad A. Impact of Simulated Microgravity on Cytoskeleton and Viscoelastic Properties of Endothelial Cell. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32418.
Wu XT, Yang X, Tian R, Li YH, Wang CY, Fan YB, et al. Cells respond to space microgravity through cytoskeleton reorganization. FASEB J. 2022;36:e22114.
Zhao T, Tang X, Umeshappa CS, Ma H, Gao H, Deng Y, et al. Simulated Microgravity Promotes Cell Apoptosis Through Suppressing Uev1A/TICAM/TRAF/NF-kappaB-Regulated Anti-Apoptosis and p53/PCNA- and ATM/ATR-Chk1/2-Controlled DNA-Damage Response Pathways. J Cell Biochem. 2016;117:2138–48.
Vorselen D, Roos WH, MacKintosh FC, Wuite GJ, van, Loon JJ. The role of the cytoskeleton in sensing changes in gravity by nonspecialized cells. FASEB J. 2014;28:536–47.
Hughes-Fulford M. Function of the cytoskeleton in gravisensing during spaceflight. Adv Space Res. 2003;32:1585–93.
Lewis ML, Reynolds JL, Cubano LA, Hatton JP, Lawless BD, Piepmeier EH. Spaceflight alters microtubules and increases apoptosis in human lymphocytes (Jurkat). FASEB J. 1998;12:1007–18.
Ingber D. How cells (might) sense microgravity. FASEB J. 1999;13:S3–15.
Romswinkel A, Infanger M, Dietz C, Strube F, Kraus A. The Role of C-X-C Chemokine Receptor Type 4 (CXCR4) in Cell Adherence and Spheroid Formation of Human Ewing’s Sarcoma Cells under Simulated Microgravity. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:6073.
Kopp S, Slumstrup L, Corydon TJ, Sahana J, Aleshcheva G, Islam T, et al. Identifications of novel mechanisms in breast cancer cells involving duct-like multicellular spheroid formation after exposure to the Random Positioning Machine. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26887.
Warnke E, Pietsch J, Wehland M, Bauer J, Infanger M, Gorog M, et al. Spheroid formation of human thyroid cancer cells under simulated microgravity: a possible role of CTGF and CAV1. Cell Commun Signal. 2014;12:32.
Hader DP, Braun M, Grimm D, Hemmersbach R. Gravireceptors in eukaryotes-a comparison of case studies on the cellular level. NPJ Microgravity. 2017;3:13.
Corydon TJ, Kopp S, Wehland M, Braun M, Schutte A, Mayer T, et al. Alterations of the cytoskeleton in human cells in space proved by life-cell imaging. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20043.
Ma X, Pietsch J, Wehland M, Schulz H, Saar K, Hubner N, et al. Differential gene expression profile and altered cytokine secretion of thyroid cancer cells in space. FASEB J. 2014;28:813–35.
Kopp S, Sahana J, Islam T, Petersen AG, Bauer J, Corydon TJ, et al. The role of NFkappaB in spheroid formation of human breast cancer cells cultured on the Random Positioning Machine. Sci Rep. 2018;8:921.
Aleshcheva G, Wehland M, Sahana J, Bauer J, Corydon TJ, Hemmersbach R, et al. Moderate alterations of the cytoskeleton in human chondrocytes after short-term microgravity produced by parabolic flight maneuvers could be prevented by up-regulation of BMP-2 and SOX-9. FASEB J. 2015;29:2303–14.
Dietz C, Infanger M, Romswinkel A, Strube F, Kraus A. Apoptosis Induction and Alteration of Cell Adherence in Human Lung Cancer Cells under Simulated Microgravity. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3601.
van den Nieuwenhof DWA, Moroni L, Chou J, Hinkelbein J. Cellular response in three-dimensional spheroids and tissues exposed to real and simulated microgravity: a narrative review. NPJ Microgravity. 2024;10:102.
Kimlin LC, Casagrande G, Virador VM. In vitro three-dimensional (3D) models in cancer research: an update. Mol Carcinog. 2013;52:167–82.
Mukhopadhyay S, Saha R, Palanisamy A, Ghosh M, Biswas A, Roy S, et al. A systems biology pipeline identifies new immune and disease related molecular signatures and networks in human cells during microgravity exposure. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25975.
Zhao J, Ma H, Wu L, Cao L, Yang Q, Dong H, et al. The influence of simulated microgravity on proliferation and apoptosis in U251 glioma cells. Vitr Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2017;53:744–51.
Kim YJ, Jeong AJ, Kim M, Lee C, Ye SK, Kim S. Time-averaged simulated microgravity (taSMG) inhibits proliferation of lymphoma cells, L-540 and HDLM-2, using a 3D clinostat. Biomed Eng Online. 2017;16:48.
Nakaseko Y, Yanagida M. Cell biology. Cytoskeleton in the cell cycle. Nature. 2001;412:291–2.
Rijken PJ, de Groot RP, Kruijer W, de Laat SW, Verkleij AJ, Boonstra J. Identification of specific gravity sensitive signal transduction pathways in human A431 carcinoma cells. Adv Space Res. 1992;12:145–52.
Bockhorn J, Yee K, Chang YF, Prat A, Huo D, Nwachukwu C, et al. MicroRNA-30c targets cytoskeleton genes involved in breast cancer cell invasion. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137:373–82.
Low EK, Brudvik E, Kuhlman B, Wilson PF, Almeida-Porada G, Porada CD. Microgravity Impairs DNA Damage Repair in Human Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells and Inhibits Their Differentiation into Dendritic Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2018;27:1257–67.
Calcagno G, Jeandel J, Frippiat JP, Kaminski S. Simulated Microgravity Disrupts Nuclear Factor kappaB Signaling and Impairs Murine Dendritic Cell Phenotype and Function. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:1720.
Luo H, Wang C, Feng M, Zhao Y. Microgravity inhibits resting T cell immunity in an exposure time-dependent manner. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11:87–96.
Spatz JM, Fulford MH, Tsai A, Gaudilliere D, Hedou J, Ganio E, et al. Human immune system adaptations to simulated microgravity revealed by single-cell mass cytometry. Sci Rep. 2021;11:11872.
Sun Y, Kuang Y, Zuo Z. The Emerging Role of Macrophages in Immune System Dysfunction under Real and Simulated Microgravity Conditions. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:2333.
Ludtka C, Silberman J, Moore E, Allen JB. Macrophages in microgravity: the impact of space on immune cells. NPJ Microgravity. 2021;7:13.
Fava M, De Dominicis N, Forte G, Bari M, Leuti A, Maccarrone M. Cellular and Molecular Effects of Microgravity on the Immune System: A Focus on Bioactive Lipids. Biomolecules. 2024;14:446.
Sadhukhan R, Majumdar D, Garg S, Landes RD, McHargue V, Pawar SA, et al. Simultaneous exposure to chronic irradiation and simulated microgravity differentially alters immune cell phenotype in mouse thymus and spleen. Life Sci Space Res (Amst). 2021;28:66–73.
Buken C, Sahana J, Corydon TJ, Melnik D, Bauer J, Wehland M, et al. Morphological and Molecular Changes in Juvenile Normal Human Fibroblasts Exposed to Simulated Microgravity. Sci Rep. 2019;9:11882.
Li N, Wang C, Sun S, Zhang C, Lu D, Chen Q, et al. Microgravity-Induced Alterations of Inflammation-Related Mechanotransduction in Endothelial Cells on Board SJ-10 Satellite. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1025.
Locatelli L, Maier JAM. Cytoskeletal Remodeling Mimics Endothelial Response to Microgravity. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:733573.
Li C, Pan Y, Tan Y, Wang Y, Sun X. PINK1-Dependent Mitophagy Reduced Endothelial Hyperpermeability and Cell Migration Capacity Under Simulated Microgravity. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:896014.
Vidyasekar P, Shyamsunder P, Arun R, Santhakumar R, Kapadia NK, Kumar R, et al. Genome Wide Expression Profiling of Cancer Cell Lines Cultured in Microgravity Reveals Significant Dysregulation of Cell Cycle and MicroRNA Gene Networks. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0135958.
Grimm D, Wehland M, Corydon TJ, Richter P, Prasad B, Bauer J, et al. The effects of microgravity on differentiation and cell growth in stem cells and cancer stem cells. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2020;9:882–94.
Shi ZX, Rao W, Wang H, Wang ND, Si JW, Zhao J, et al. Modeled microgravity suppressed invasion and migration of human glioblastoma U87 cells through downregulating store-operated calcium entry. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;457:378–84.
Topal U, Zamur C. Microgravity, Stem Cells, and Cancer: A New Hope for Cancer Treatment. Stem Cells Int. 2021;2021:5566872.
Davis T, Tabury K, Zhu S, Angeloni D, Baatout S, Benchoua A, et al. How are cell and tissue structure and function influenced by gravity and what are the gravity perception mechanisms? NPJ Microgravity. 2024;10:16.
Wang X, Du J, Wang D, Zeng F, Wei Y, Wang F, et al. Effects of simulated microgravity on human brain nervous tissue. Neurosci Lett. 2016;627:199–204.
Nassef MZ, Kopp S, Wehland M, Melnik D, Sahana J, Kruger M, et al. Real Microgravity Influences the Cytoskeleton and Focal Adhesions in Human Breast Cancer Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3156.
Wu XL, Chen Y, Kong WC, Zhao ZQ. Amyloid precursor protein regulates 5-fluorouracil resistance in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells by inhibiting the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2020;21:234–45.
da Silveira WA, Fazelinia H, Rosenthal SB, Laiakis EC, Kim MS, Meydan C, et al. Comprehensive Multi-omics Analysis Reveals Mitochondrial Stress as a Central Biological Hub for Spaceflight Impact. Cell. 2020;183:1185–201 e20.
Claro S, Oshiro ME, Mortara RA, Paredes-Gamero EJ, Pereira GJ, Smaili SS, et al. gamma-Rays-generated ROS induce apoptosis via mitochondrial and cell cycle alteration in smooth muscle cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 2014;90:914–27.
Singh R, Rajput M, Singh RP. Simulated microgravity triggers DNA damage and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis through ROS generation in human promyelocytic leukemic cells. Mitochondrion. 2021;61:114–24.
Lee YG, Park DH, Chae YC. Role of Mitochondrial Stress Response in Cancer Progression. Cells. 2022;11:771.
Riwaldt S, Monici M, Graver Petersen A, Birk Jensen U, Evert K, Pantalone D, et al. Preparation of A Spaceflight: Apoptosis Search in Sutured Wound Healing Models. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:2604.
Li J, Zhang S, Chen J, Du T, Wang Y, Wang Z. Modeled microgravity causes changes in the cytoskeleton and focal adhesions, and decreases in migration in malignant human MCF-7 cells. Protoplasma. 2009;238:23–33.
Kang CY, Zou L, Yuan M, Wang Y, Li TZ, Zhang Y, et al. Impact of simulated microgravity on microvascular endothelial cell apoptosis. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111:2131–8.
Dang B, Yang Y, Zhang E, Li W, Mi X, Meng Y, et al. Simulated microgravity increases heavy ion radiation-induced apoptosis in human B lymphoblasts. Life Sci. 2014;97:123–8.
Jiang M, Wang H, Liu Z, Lin L, Wang L, Xie M, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-dependent activation of iNOS/NO-NF-kappaB signaling and NLRP3 inflammasome contributes to endothelial inflammation and apoptosis associated with microgravity. FASEB J. 2020;34:10835–49.
Zhao T, Li R, Tan X, Zhang J, Fan C, Zhao Q, et al. Simulated Microgravity Reduces Focal Adhesions and Alters Cytoskeleton and Nuclear Positioning Leading to Enhanced Apoptosis via Suppressing FAK/RhoA-Mediated mTORC1/NF-kappaB and ERK1/2 Pathways. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1994.
Sharma CS, Sarkar S, Periyakaruppan A, Ravichandran P, Sadanandan B, Ramesh V, et al. Simulated microgravity activates apoptosis and NF-kappaB in mice testis. Mol Cell Biochem. 2008;313:71–8.
Sokolovskaya A, Korneeva E, Zaichenko D, Virus E, Kolesov D, Moskovtsev A, et al. Changes in the Surface Expression of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 3, the Induction of Apoptosis, and the Inhibition of Cell-Cycle Progression of Human Multidrug-Resistant Jurkat/A4 Cells Exposed to a Random Positioning Machine. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:855.
Bauer J. Microgravity and Cell Adherence. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:2214.
Li J, Chen J, Li X, Qian Y. Vaccination efficacy with marrow mesenchymal stem cell against cancer was enhanced under simulated microgravity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;485:606–13.
Costanzo R, Scalia G, Noto M, Marrone S, Ferini G, Maugeri R, et al. Microgravity Effects on Glioma Cells: A Comprehensive Review. Discov Med. 2024;36:2143–51.
Carneiro BA, El-Deiry WS. Targeting apoptosis in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:395–417.
Nguyen HP, Shin S, Shin KJ, Tran PH, Park H, De Tran Q, et al. Protective effect of TPP-Niacin on microgravity-induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction of retinal epithelial cells. Biochimica et biophysica acta Mol Cell Res. 2023;1870:119384.
Capri M, Conte M, Ciurca E, Pirazzini C, Garagnani P, Santoro A, et al. Long-term human spaceflight and inflammaging: Does it promote aging? Ageing Res Rev 2023;87:101909.
Aventaggiato M, Barreca F, Vitiello L, Vespa S, Valente S, Rotili D, et al. Role of SIRT3 in Microgravity Response: A New Player in Muscle Tissue Recovery. Cells. 2023;12:691.
Arun RP, Sivanesan D, Patra B, Varadaraj S, Verma RS. Simulated microgravity increases polyploid giant cancer cells and nuclear localization of YAP. Sci Rep. 2019;9:10684.
Fukazawa T, Tanimoto K, Shrestha L, Imura T, Takahashi S, Sueda T, et al. Simulated microgravity enhances CDDP-induced apoptosis signal via p53-independent mechanisms in cancer cells. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0219363.
Jeong AJ, Kim YJ, Lim MH, Lee H, Noh K, Kim BH, et al. Microgravity induces autophagy via mitochondrial dysfunction in human Hodgkin’s lymphoma cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8:14646.
Ferranti F, Caruso M, Cammarota M, Masiello MG, Corano Scheri K, Fabrizi C, et al. Cytoskeleton modifications and autophagy induction in TCam-2 seminoma cells exposed to simulated microgravity. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:904396.
Marino G, Niso-Santano M, Baehrecke EH, Kroemer G. Self-consumption: the interplay of autophagy and apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:81–94.
Takeda M, Magaki T, Okazaki T, Kawahara Y, Manabe T, Yuge L, et al. Effects of simulated microgravity on proliferation and chemosensitivity in malignant glioma cells. Neurosci Lett. 2009;463:54–9.
Povea-Cabello S, Oropesa-Avila M, de la Cruz-Ojeda P, Villanueva-Paz M, de la Mata M, Suarez-Rivero JM, et al. Dynamic Reorganization of the Cytoskeleton during Apoptosis: The Two Coffins Hypothesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:2393.
O’Connor JW, Mistry K, Detweiler D, Wang C, Gomez EW. Cell-cell contact and matrix adhesion promote alphaSMA expression during TGFbeta1-induced epithelial-myofibroblast transition via Notch and MRTF-A. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26226.
Shi S, Li Q, Cao Q, Diao Y, Zhang Y, Yue L, et al. EMT Transcription Factors Are Involved in the Altered Cell Adhesion under Simulated Microgravity Effect or Overloading by Regulation of E-cadherin. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1349.
Tan X, Xu A, Zhao T, Zhao Q, Zhang J, Fan C, et al. Simulated microgravity inhibits cell focal adhesions leading to reduced melanoma cell proliferation and metastasis via FAK/RhoA-regulated mTORC1 and AMPK pathways. Sci Rep. 2018;8:3769.
Sahana J, Nassef MZ, Wehland M, Kopp S, Kruger M, Corydon TJ, et al. Decreased E-Cadherin in MCF7 Human Breast Cancer Cells Forming Multicellular Spheroids Exposed to Simulated Microgravity. Proteomics. 2018;18:e1800015.
Costantini D, Overi D, Casadei L, Cardinale V, Nevi L, Carpino G, et al. Simulated microgravity promotes the formation of tridimensional cultures and stimulates pluripotency and a glycolytic metabolism in human hepatic and biliary tree stem/progenitor cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5559.
Chen ZY, Jiang N, Guo S, Li BB, Yang JQ, Chai SB, et al. Effect of simulated microgravity on metabolism of HGC-27 gastric cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 2020;19:3439–50.
Zhang X, Zhou X, Tu Z, Qiang L, Lu Z, Xie Y, et al. Proteomic and ubiquitinome analysis reveal that microgravity affects glucose metabolism of mouse hearts by remodeling non-degradative ubiquitination. PLoS One. 2024;19:e0313519.
Ma X, Wehland M, Schulz H, Saar K, Hubner N, Infanger M, et al. Genomic approach to identify factors that drive the formation of three-dimensional structures by EA.hy926 endothelial cells. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64402.
Pisanu ME, Noto A, De Vitis C, Masiello MG, Coluccia P, Proietti S, et al. Lung cancer stem cell lose their stemness default state after exposure to microgravity. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:470253.
Indo HP, Majima HJ, Terada M, Suenaga S, Tomita K, Yamada S, et al. Changes in mitochondrial homeostasis and redox status in astronauts following long stays in space. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39015.
Zhu M, Jin XW, Wu BY, Nie JL, Li YH. Effects of simulated weightlessness on cellular morphology and biological characteristics of cell lines SGC-7901 and HFE-145. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13:6060–9.
Grimm D, Bauer J, Kossmehl P, Shakibaei M, Schoberger J, Pickenhahn H, et al. Simulated microgravity alters differentiation and increases apoptosis in human follicular thyroid carcinoma cells. FASEB J. 2002;16:604–6.
Melnik D, Sahana J, Corydon TJ, Kopp S, Nassef MZ, Wehland M, et al. Dexamethasone Inhibits Spheroid Formation of Thyroid Cancer Cells Exposed to Simulated Microgravity. Cells. 2020;9:367.
Kossmehl P, Shakibaei M, Cogoli A, Infanger M, Curcio F, Schonberger J, et al. Weightlessness induced apoptosis in normal thyroid cells and papillary thyroid carcinoma cells via extrinsic and intrinsic pathways. Endocrinology. 2003;144:4172–9.
Masiello MG, Cucina A, Proietti S, Palombo A, Coluccia P, D’Anselmi F, et al. Phenotypic switch induced by simulated microgravity on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:652434.
Cui Q, Yang H, Gu Y, Zong C, Chen X, Lin Y, et al. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis of gene expression provides new insights into hindlimb unloading-induced skeletal muscle atrophy. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:1595.
Bonfiglio T, Biggi F, Bassi AM, Ferrando S, Gallus L, Loiacono F, et al. Simulated microgravity induces nuclear translocation of Bax and BCL-2 in glial cultured C6 cells. Heliyon. 2019;5:e01798.
Vincent L, Avancena P, Cheng J, Rafii S, Rabbany SY. Simulated microgravity impairs leukemic cell survival through altering VEGFR-2/VEGF-A signaling pathway. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005;33:1405–10.
Jaeger PA, Wyss-Coray T. All-you-can-eat: autophagy in neurodegeneration and neuroprotection. Mol neurodegeneration. 2009;4:16.
Funding
This research was funded by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. LQN25H160029).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, Jian Yuan and Sisi Zhang; writing—original draft, Jian Yuan, Sisi Zhang, and Yi Xu; writing—review and editing, Zuchao Cai and Qianming Chen; supervision and funding acquisition, Qianming Chen. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, J., Zhang, S., Xu, Y. et al. Microgravity and cancer cells: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. Cell Death Discov. 12, 9 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-025-02836-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-025-02836-8






