Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Designable synthetic complex coacervates enabling protein delivery to cells

Abstract

Biomolecular condensates offer a versatile platform for the accumulation of biomacromolecules, particularly proteins. This study investigated synthetic complex coacervates as a model of biomolecular condensates and developed a novel tool for the intracellular delivery of proteins to overcome the issues of cytotoxicity and poor cellular uptake. By optimizing preparation conditions and chemical structures and developing a simple pre-coating method, we achieved an improvement in the interaction and internalization of coacervates for HeLa and Jurkat cells and the reduction of cytotoxicity. Furthermore, the use of charge-density reduced polymers enabled the effective encapsulation and intracellular delivery of various proteins. The mechanism of cellular internalization was also investigated, and macropinocytosis was concluded to be a primary internalization pathway. These findings provide a foundation for future advancements in biomaterials.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Scheme 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Niu X, Zhang L, Wu Y, Zong Z, Wang B, Liu J, et al. Biomolecular condensates: Formation mechanisms, biological functions, and therapeutic targets. MedComm (2020). 2023;4:e223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitrea DM, Mittasch M, Gomes BF, Klein IA, Murcko MA. Modulating biomolecular condensates: a novel approach to drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21:841–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Yewdall NA, André AAM, Lu T, Spruijt E. Coacervates as models of membraneless organelles. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;52:101416.

  4. Roy PS. Complex coacervate-based materials for biomedicine: recent advancements and future prospects. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2024;63:5414–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma L, Fang X, Wang C. Peptide-based coacervates in therapeutic applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:1100365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boija A, Klein IA, Young RA. Biomolecular condensates and cancer. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:174–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Forenzo C, Larsen J. Complex coacervates as a promising vehicle for mRNA delivery: a comprehensive review of recent advances and challenges. Mol Pharm. 2023;20:4387–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Margossian KO, Brown MU, Emrick T, Muthukumar M. Coacervation in polyzwitterion-polyelectrolyte systems and their potential applications for gastrointestinal drug delivery platforms. Nat Commun. 2022;13:2250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cao S, Song S, Ivanov T, Doan-Nguyen TP, Caire da Silva L, Xie J, et al. Synthetic biomolecular condensates: phase-separation control, cytomimetic modelling and emerging biomedical potential. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2024: e202418431.

  10. Chen S, Guo Q, Yu J. Bio-inspired functional coacervates. Aggregate, 2022;3.

  11. Wang L, Wang N, Zhang W, Cheng X, Yan Z, Shao G, et al. Therapeutic peptides: current applications and future directions. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7:48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Iwata T, Hirose H, Sakamoto K, Hirai Y, Arafiles JVV, Akishiba M, et al. Liquid droplet formation and facile cytosolic translocation of IgG in the presence of attenuated cationic amphiphilic lytic peptides. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2021;60:19804–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kapelner RA, Yeong V, Obermeyer AC. Molecular determinants of protein-based coacervates. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;52:101407.

  14. Rumyantsev AM, Jackson NE, de Pablo JJ. Polyelectrolyte complex coacervates: recent developments and new frontiers. Annu Rev Condens Matter Phys. 2021;12:155–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou L, Shi H, Li Z, He C. Recent advances in complex coacervation design from macromolecular assemblies and emerging applications. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2020;41:e2000149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou J, Wan Y, Cohen Stuart MA, Wang M, Wang J. Effects of control factors on protein-polyelectrolyte complex coacervation. Biomacromolecules. 2023;24:5759–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spath F, Donau C, Bergmann AM, Kranzlein M, Synatschke CV, Rieger B, et al. Molecular design of chemically fueled peptide-polyelectrolyte coacervate-based assemblies. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143:4782–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sathyavageeswaran A, Bonesso Sabadini J, Perry SL. Self-assembling polypeptides in complex coacervation. Acc Chem Res. 2024;57:386–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. K CB, Nii T, Mori T, Katayama Y, Akihiro K. Dynamic frustrated charge hotspots created by charge density modulation sequester globular proteins into complex coacervates. Chem Sci. 2023;14:6608–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu T, Liese S, Schoenmakers L, Weber CA, Suzuki H, Huck WTS, et al. Endocytosis of coacervates into liposomes. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;144:13451–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wibowo A, Osada K, Matsuda H, Anraku Y, Hirose H, Kishimura A, et al. Morphology control in water of polyion complex nanoarchitectures of double-hydrophilic charged block copolymers through composition tuning and thermal treatment. Macromolecules. 2014;47:3086–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar ARK, Shou Y, Chan B, Krishaa L, Tay A. Materials for improving immune cell transfection. Adv Mater. 2021;33:e2007421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Iwai R, Haruki R, Nemoto Y, Nakayama Y. Induction of cell self-organization on weakly positively charged surfaces prepared by the deposition of polyion complex nanoparticles of thermoresponsive, zwitterionic copolymers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017;105:1009–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aulia F, Matsuba H, Adachi S, Yamada T, Nakase I, Nii T, et al. Effective design of PEGylated polyion complex (PIC) nanoparticles for enhancing PIC internalisation in cells utilising block copolymer combinations with mismatched ionic chain lengths. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12:1826–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mangiarotti A, Dimova R. Biomolecular Condensates in Contact with Membranes. Annu Rev Biophys. 2024:53:319–41.

  26. Insua I, Wilkinson A, Fernandez-Trillo F. Polyion complex (PIC) particles: Preparation and biomedical applications. Eur Polym J. 2016;81:198–215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Nojima T, Iyoda T. Water-rich fluid material containing orderly condensed proteins. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56:1308–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin HP, Singla B, Ghoshal P, Faulkner JL, Cherian-Shaw M, O’Connor PM, et al. Identification of novel macropinocytosis inhibitors using a rational screen of Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs. Br J Pharm. 2018;175:3640–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (JP24H01151, JP23K23469, and 22H05429 to AK). BJL is grateful to the “Future-Creation (MIRAI)” Course, Kyushu University SPRING program (No. JPMJSP2136) for scholarship and research fund. We thank Drs. M. Goto, N. Kamiya, and R. Wakabayashi (Kyushu University) for their assistance with the CLSM measurements. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BJL performed the experiments and prepared the manuscript. BKC gave advice on the experiments. AK designed the research as a supervisor of BJL, validated data, and prepared the manuscript. TN, TM, and YK also validated data and gave advice on the experiments and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akihiro Kishimura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, B.J., K C, B., Nii, T. et al. Designable synthetic complex coacervates enabling protein delivery to cells. Polym J 57, 911–922 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-025-01043-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-025-01043-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links