Table 3 Estimates of Bland-Altman analyses.

From: Body composition assessment in 6-month-old infants: A comparison of two- and three-compartment models using data from the Baby-bod study

Parameter

2C-PP vs 3C

2C-DD vs 3C

2C-PP vs 2C-DD

FM

 Mean difference

–0.0001 (–0.054, 0.054)

–0.007 (–0.043, 0.029)

0.007 (–0.073, 0.087)

 Upper LOA

0.439 (0.346, 0.533)

0.282 (0.221, 0.344)

0.657 (0.519, 0.7949)

 Lower LOA

–0.439 (–0.533, –0.346)

–0.296 (–0.358, –0.235)

-0.643 (-0.789, -0.505)

 Slope

–0.043 (–0.178, 0.093)

0.135 (0.062, 0.207)

-0.196 (-0.384, -0.009)

%FM

 Mean difference

0.0003 (–0.784, 0.785)

–0.109 (–0.624, 0.406)

0.109 (-1.043, 1.261)

 Upper LOA

6.352 (5.005, 7.699)

4.061 (3.176, 4.945)

9.436 (7.458, 11.414)

 Lower LOA

–6.352 (–7.699, –5.005)

–4.278 (–5.163, –3.394)

-9.217 (-11.196, -7.239)

 Slope

–0.032 (–0.220, 0.156)

0.205 (0.114, 0.297)

-0.287 (-0.539, -0.035)

  1. All values are estimate (95% confidence interval); FM fat mass, %FM percent fat mass, 2C-PP two-compartment model with PEA POD, 2C-DD two-compartment model with deuterium dilution technique, 3C three-compartment model, LOA limits of agreement.