Table 1 Summary of sequencing approaches in hereditary cancer testing (HCT).
From: Sequencing approaches in hereditary cancer testing: strengths, limitations and future directions
Sequencing Approach | Targeted Sequencing / MGPT | ES | GS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genome coverage | 10s–100s genes | All coding genes | Genome-wide | ||
Sequencing Technology | SRS | LRS | SRS | SRS | LRS |
Current application level | Clinical (Standard) | Emerging | Clinical | Clinical | Emerging |
Relative Cost | + | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++++ |
Sequencing deptha | ~200–1000x | ~50–200x | ~100x | ~30–40x | ~20–40x |
Covered regionsb | Exons + splice regions | Exons + Introns + UTR | Exons + splice regions | Genome-widef | Whole genome |
Primary research potential | Candidate CPG | Candidate CPG, non-coding variants, SV, Epigenetics | Candidate CPG | Candidate CPG, non-coding variants, PRS | Candidate CPG, non-coding variants, PRS, SV, Epigenetics |
Variant Detection | |||||
SNV/indels ( < 50 bp) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
SV/CNV | Limited | ✓ | Limited | Limited | ✓ |
Challenging HCT genes (PMS2) | Limited | ✓ | Limited | Limited | ✓ |
Orthogonal confirmation requiredc | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Epigeneticsd | X | PCR: X; Native DNA: ✓ | X | X | ✓ |
+ RNA Sequencing | |||||
Detection of abnormal splicing | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Detection of large intronic retentions | Limited | ✓ | Limited | Limited | ✓ |
Isoform quantification | X | ✓ | X | X | ✓ |
RNA quality requirementse | Medium | High | Medium-High | Medium-High | High |
+ Somatic Testing | |||||
Somatic second hits | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Mutational signature inference | X | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Epigeneticsd | X | PCR: X; Native DNA: ✓ | X | X | ✓ |