We read with interest the article by Goldberg et al. [1] regarding lacrimal stenting alone versus Kelly punch punctoplasty (KPP) combined with stenting for the treatment of simple punctal stenosis. Both techniques involve the use of a Mini Monoka (MM) silicon stent (FCI Ophthalmics, France Chirurgie Instrumentation, Paris, France) kept in-situ for one month to maintain patency of the punctum in the early post-operative period. The authors concluded that simple punctal dilation with MM stent insertion is effective in relieving symptoms of punctal stenosis and that KPP with MM stent conferred no additional benefits [1]. While we agree that punctal dilation with MM without punctoplasty has the advantage of being performed as an office procedure, the value of punctoplasty combined with lacrimal stenting—in group 2 of this study—for simple punctal stenosis is unclear. The latter approach may, however, be suitable in selected patients including cicatrising peri-punctal disease, internal punctal stenosis, or canalicular stricture.

Comparable results have been shown between punctal dilation with stenting and 3 snip punctoplasty without stenting, highlighting that stenting is not essential in the latter. Other non-comparative studies of surgical punctoplasty without stenting also show high anatomical and functional success rates of up to over 90% [2,3,4]. Not only does stent placement require an interim clinic review—with inherent costs—for stent removal before the evaluation of symptomatic improvement can be carried out, but it may carry risks including stent retention [5], migration [6], granuloma formation [7], infection, and biofilm formation [8], and potential trauma to the canalicular system with creation of a false passage. Furthermore, the design of a MM stent relies on the plug component to anchor the stent into the punctum; division of the ampulla as is performed in a surgical punctoplasty potentially renders the stent unstable, and may therefore increase the risk of stent prolapse or migration.

Log in or create a free account to read this content

Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com

Access through your institution

or

Sign in or create an account
Continue with Google
Continue with ORCiD