Abstract
The Hippocratic text On Airs, Waters, Places advises physicians to attend to all aspects of the environment—the seasons, the wind direction, and the soil and water quality, i.e., the ecosystem—when addressing people’s health. Hippocrates emphasizes that the ecosystem influences health, disease, and therapeutic choices. Now is the time to consider how this medical wisdom can be integrated into healthcare systems and utilized for people’s health. This review discusses how the ecosystem can affect blood pressure (BP) in humans and provides a synthesis of the related resources available in the literature to inform the actions of healthcare providers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
High blood pressure (BP; hypertension) is a leading global health risk. In an international survey, the prevalence of persons who had systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg increased substantially from 1990 to 2015, and losses of disability-adjusted life-years and deaths associated with high BP also increased [1]. The drivers of these trends include urbanization in developing countries, increased dietary salt intake, low consumption of fruits and vegetables, overweight and obesity, low physical activity, and ecosystem disruption (e.g., pollution and natural disasters). Advanced technologies, including omics technology, data science, and mobile health, provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying high BP and could identify therapeutic targets for maintaining optimal BP and cardiovascular health over a lifetime. This review highlights three scientific focus areas that are emerging opportunities for future research in BP: (1) social and residential environmental determinants of high BP, (2) the role of internal and external microbiota in BP regulation, and (3) the effect of climate change on BP. Collectively, this review article emphasizes that the “ecosystem” is a key determinant of BP regulation in humans and discusses how the ecosystem concept can be integrated into healthcare systems and applied to improve human health.
The impacts of social and residential environmental factors on BP
Social factors, including education, income, occupation, housing, neighborhood, and social support, are crucial determinants of hypertension, racial health disparities in hypertension, compliance with treatment, and BP control among patients taking antihypertensive medication [3, 4]. The limited successes in achieving and sustaining BP control in the clinical setting must be overcome by improving the social determinants of health through a holistic health management approach tailored to each individual. We and other investigators have reported that regional differences are present within communities with regard to the prevalence and awareness of hypertension and hypertension-related target organ damage [5,6,7]. These regional differences may be attributable to the differences in access to services within the ecosystem (e.g., healthcare and education systems, safe places to engage in physical activity, ways to obtain healthy food) and in family system dynamics (e.g., early childhood experiences and development, such as nurturing by family members) across regions. Therefore, in the clinical setting, social and residential environmental factors should be assessed for each individual, and multilevel and multicomponent strategies, along with patient-level interventions, are required to achieve and sustain BP control. For example, maintaining continuity in attending medical appointments and medication adherence is challenging if patients have poor access to health services. In such cases, appropriate services, such as secured transportation systems, patient–healthcare provider communication facilitation using eHealth (e.g., remote telemonitoring) [8, 9], and community health worker engagement [10], may be required to improve productivity, retention, and quality of care. These interventions must involve multidisciplinary team-based care from a team that includes primary care providers, nurses, pharmacists, social workers, policy-makers, and community organizations [10, 11]. In the United States, states that have allocated more resources to social services than to medical expenditures have had better health outcomes than states that did not take such actions [12]. Early childhood programs (i.e., cognitive and social stimulation that develops language, emotional regulation, and cognitive skills from birth through 5 years of age) have led to reductions in BP during young adulthood [13]. Further investigations are required to determine how to incorporate social determinant data into clinical decision-making to improve BP management, including individualized risk assessments, the physician’s performance in conducting an appropriately thorough and comprehensive assessment of the factors affecting the patient’s BP, and person- and population-focused interventions. The widespread availability of digital technologies, electronic health records, mobile health apps, and machine learning analytic techniques offer opportunities to elucidate and validate the novel social and residential environmental factors associated with high BP, which in turn may lead to the identification of novel therapeutic targets for hypertension.
Role of microorganisms in BP
Microorganisms living within an ecosystem create microbial communities and play key roles in ecosystem functioning. During their lifespan, humans share their bodies with a variety of microorganisms. More than 10–100 trillion symbiotic microorganisms live on and within human beings, and the majority of these microorganisms populate the distal ileum and colon (referred to as the gut microbiota) [14]. For each individual, the taxonomic and functional composition of the gut microbiome is stable over time in the absence of stress or intervention [15]. While this may be true under highly controlled conditions, it is not the case for most human beings; we all experience stress, and most of us have been prescribed antibiotics at some point that have affected our microbiome.
Gut dysbiosis—an imbalance in the composition and function of the intestinal microbiome—has been shown to be associated with hypertension [16,17,18]. Furthermore, microbiome-encoded enzymes directly affect the intestinal and systemic metabolism of antihypertensive drugs [19]. In addition to the microbiota inside of the living body, external microbiota (e.g., the soil microbiome) may also affect BP in humans. For example, microorganisms in the foods we eat and the quality of these foods can affect micronutrient levels in humans and modulate our gut microbiota [20].
Biodiversity is fundamental for productivity, functioning, and stability within ecosystems [21, 22]. Biodiversity can maintain the stability and resilience of a healthy microbial ecosystem, e.g., even if a single species is lost, other species may reconstitute the missing biological function [23]. Emerging evidence suggests that decreased richness and diversity in the gut microbiota are associated with an increased risk for hypertension in humans [16, 17]. Loss of biodiversity in the gut microbiota occurs through aging, circadian rhythm disruption, and lifestyle choices, including poor diet and low physical activity [24, 25]. A loss of biodiversity in the gut microbiota renders people vulnerable to the stresses that elevate BP, including salt intake, socioeconomic factors, poor social environments, and sympathovagal imbalance [26].
Improvements in sanitation and personal hygiene and the increasing use of agrochemicals have reduced biodiversity in external microbiotas (e.g., the soil microbiome) [27]. These changes may affect human health. For example, an environment with low microbiotic diversity may cause allergies and autoimmune diseases (hygiene hypothesis) [28]. A loss of diversity in the soil microbiome causes forest degradation, which potentially affects BP in humans because of reduced opportunities to spend time relaxing in nature (e.g., shinrin-yoku) [29, 30]. Therefore, restoring biodiversity in our internal and external microbiotas may facilitate BP management in humans. Healthy diets (e.g., whole grains and vegetables), exercise, and adequate sleep quality help to restore biodiversity in the gut microbiota [31,32,33,34]. Increasing green spaces and vegetation and improving habitats to support a wide variety of plant and animal species within an environment can restore external biodiversity [35].
The gut microbiota in healthy adults is dominated by Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, followed by Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Archaea, Eucarya (predominantly yeasts), and multiple phages [36]. Microbial species and their relative proportions vary across individuals, and this variation has been shown to be correlated with hypertension. The Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio, which is increased by a Western diet [37], is a signature of gut dysbiosis, and a higher ratio is associated with hypertension [38]. Specific bacterial genera, including Streptococcus, Bifidobacterium, and Clostridium, may regulate BP by producing small molecules and metabolites generated from interactions with the host and its diet [16, 39,40,41]. For example, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), including acetate, propionate, and butyrate, are metabolites generated by the fermentation of food polysaccharides (e.g., vegetables and fruits). SCFAs absorbed across the epithelium into the circulation regulate renin secretion, vascular tone, and sympathetic nerve activity by binding to G-protein-coupled receptors in the kidney, vasculature, and brain [42, 43]. Reduced SCFA-producing gut bacteria and circulating SCFA levels are found in hypertensive rodents and human patients [43, 44]. Supplementation with SCFAs and with probiotics that increase the production of SCFAs has been shown to reduce BP in mice and humans [42, 44, 45]. Therefore, modulating the composition and function of the gut microbiota using probiotics, antibiotics, and fecal transplant may be a novel preventive and treatment strategy for hypertension. However, there are some concerns, including safety (e.g., infectious risk in fecal transplant recipients) and poor standardization for interventional approaches because of a lack of understanding regarding which specific species, strains, or metabolites reduce BP. Furthermore, microbiome associations are complex and partly dependent on host genetics, diet, and lifestyle. Microbiome engineering that increases or decreases specific bacteria as well as bacteriocins [46] and bacteriophages [47] may elucidate the individual contributions of microbiotic components to BP regulation and drug metabolism, which may inform the development of targeted therapies and personized treatments for hypertension.
The effect of climate change on BP
The global mean surface temperature has increased by 1 °C since preindustrial times due to increasing greenhouse gas emissions [48]. According to climate models, a further increase of 2–6 °C by the end of the 21st century is estimated if we continue to burn fossil fuels and accumulate greenhouse gases [49]. Greenhouse gas emissions add energy to the climate system, which can increase the prevalence of extreme weather and climate events (e.g., heat waves, floods, wildfires, and droughts) that disrupt ecosystems [50]. Increased mean surface temperatures reduce soil moisture and increase the respiration rate of the soil microbiome, stimulating carbon loss from soils and accelerating global warming [51]. Furthermore, increased temperatures alter plant phenology, weed and crop growth, and populations of insects and pests. These changes can adversely affect human health, contributing to malnutrition (i.e., obesity and undernutrition), heat-related morbidity, cardiovascular diseases, kidney diseases, water and foodborne illnesses, and mental health disorders [50, 52,53,54]. For example, in July 2019, 57 persons died due to heat-related medical issues during 1 week in Japan, and an additional 18,000 persons were hospitalized [55].
The human body maintains an average core body temperature of 37 °C to optimize its physiological function. In a warm environment, heat loss occurs via vasodilation and sweating in the skin. A recent study suggested that human body temperature has been reduced over the past century and a half [56]. However, little is known regarding how this change in chronic body temperature may alter physiological functions in humans. Heat exposure may affect pharmacokinetics in humans, and medications can affect the body’s response to heat. For example, diuretics cause dehydration, and some psychiatric medications reduce thirst. Diuretic and psychiatric medication use is associated with an increased risk for heat-related diseases, and the risk is particularly evident among older adults, persons with chronic diseases, persons who perform heavy physical labor, and underserved communities [57, 58]. Therefore, adjusting medication types and doses among high-risk populations during periods of hot weather may be required for BP management.
Climate change also threatens the achievement of effective universal healthcare. Extreme weather events due to climate can disrupt as shown in (Table 1).
Consequently, people may have difficulty achieving and sustaining BP control [60]. To avoid these outcomes, we can act now to mitigate climate change by developing and utilizing clean energy sources, producing and consuming sustainably produced food, and recycling nonhazardous waste. Implementing these strategies may be difficult given political, economic, and social challenges. However, as individuals, we can make a difference in mitigating climate change by changing our diets (reducing meat consumption and increasing fruit and vegetable intake) and transportation patterns. The healthcare sector should develop strategies for adapting to climate change (Table 2).
Conclusion
Hypertension is a complex and heterogeneous pathophenotype. A reductionist approach that assumes that all patients who have the same signs of a disease share a common disease mechanism and thus should be treated similarly is insufficient for optimal BP management. Herein, we have highlighted the contribution of the ecosystem to BP regulation in humans. In future studies, advanced analytic approaches and big data analyses that include information about the social determinants of health, panomics (i.e., transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and microbiomics), and climate will provide opportunities to elucidate the hidden and novel mechanisms underlying high BP, providing new strategies for improving BP management and human health.
References
Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, Ng M, Biryukov S, Marczak L, et al. Global burden of hypertension and systolic blood pressure of at least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990–2015. JAMA. 2017;317:165–82.
World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/globalchange/ecosystems/en/. Accessed Dec 23 2019.
Shahu A, Herrin J, Dhruva SS, Desai NR, Davis BR, Krumholz HM, et al. Disparities in socioeconomic context and association with blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes in ALLHAT. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e012277.
Lang T. Social and economic factors as obstacles to blood pressure control. Am J Hypertens. 1998;11:900–2.
Yano Y, Hoshide S, Tamaki N, Inokuchi T, Nagata M, Yokota N, et al. Regional differences in hypertensive cardiovascular remodeling between fishing and farming communities in Japan. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24:437–43.
Bravo MA, Batch BC, Miranda ML. Residential racial isolation and spatial patterning of hypertension in Durham, North Carolina. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019;16:E36.
Morenoff JD, House JS, Hansen BB, Williams DR, Kaplan GA, Hunte HE. Understanding social disparities in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control: the role of neighborhood context. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:1853–66.
Margolis KL, Asche SE, Bergdall AR, Dehmer SP, Groen SE, Kadrmas HM, et al. Effect of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management on blood pressure control: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310:46–56.
Mileski M, Kruse CS, Catalani J, Haderer T. Adopting telemedicine for the self-management of hypertension: systematic review. JMIR Med Inf. 2017;5:e41.
Mills KT, Obst KM, Shen W, Molina S, Zhang HJ, He H, et al. Comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies for blood pressure control in hypertensive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168:110–20.
Hammond G, Joynt Maddox KE. A theoretical framework for clinical implementation of social determinants of health. JAMA Cardiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3805. No abstract available. PMID: 31596433.
Bradley EH, Canavan M, Rogan E, Talbert-Slagle K, Ndumele C, Taylor L, et al. Variation In health outcomes: the role of spending on social services, public health, and health care, 2000–09. Health Aff. 2016;35:760–8.
Campbell F, Conti G, Heckman JJ, Moon SH, Pinto R, Pungello E, et al. Early childhood investments substantially boost adult health. Science. 2014;343:1478–85.
Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, Gordon JI. The human microbiome project. Nature. 2007;449:804–10.
Faith JJ, Guruge JL, Charbonneau M, Subramanian S, Seedorf H, Goodman AL, et al. The long-term stability of the human gut microbiota. Science. 2013;341:1237439.
Sun S, Lulla A, Sioda M, Winglee K, Wu MC, Jacobs DR Jr, et al. Gut microbiota composition and blood pressure. Hypertension. 2019;73:998–1006.
Kelly TN, Bazzano LA, Ajami NJ, He H, Zhao J, Petrosino JF, et al. Gut microbiome associates with lifetime cardiovascular disease risk profile among bogalusa heart study participants. Circ Res. 2016;119:956–64.
Yu Y, Mao G, Wang J, Zhu L, Lv X, Tong Q, et al. Gut dysbiosis is associated with the reduced exercise capacity of elderly patients with hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2018;41:1036–44.
Zimmermann M, Zimmermann-Kogadeeva M, Wegmann R, Goodman AL. Mapping human microbiome drug metabolism by gut bacteria and their genes. Nature. 2019;570:462–7.
Blum WEH, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Keiblinger KM. Does soil contribute to the human gut microbiome? Microorganisms. 2019;7:E287. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7090287.
Duffy JE, Godwin CM, Cardinale BJ. Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity. Nature. 2017;549:261–4.
Soliveres S, van der Plas F, Manning P, Prati D, Gossner MM, Renner SC, et al. Biodiversity at multiple trophic levels is needed for ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature. 2016;536:456–9.
Inda ME, Broset E, Lu TK, de la Fuente-Nunez C. Emerging frontiers in microbiome engineering. Trends Immunol. 2019;40:952–73.
Kaczmarek JL, Thompson SV, Holscher HD. Complex interactions of circadian rhythms, eating behaviors, and the gastrointestinal microbiota and their potential impact on health. Nutr Rev. 2017;75:673–82.
Claesson MJ, Jeffery IB, Conde S, Power SE, O’Connor EM, Cusack S, et al. Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature. 2012;488:178–84.
Dill-McFarland KA, Tang ZZ, Kemis JH, Kerby RL, Chen G, Palloni A, et al. Close social relationships correlate with human gut microbiota composition. Sci Rep. 2019;9:703.
Crowther TW, van den Hoogen J, Wan J, Mayes MA, Keiser AD, Mo L, et al. The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry. Science. 2019;365:eaav0550. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0550.
Rook GA. Review series on helminths, immune modulation and the hygiene hypothesis: the broader implications of the hygiene hypothesis. Immunology. 2009;126:3–11.
Liu Y, Wang S, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Qin H, Wei Z, et al. Soil microbiome mediated nutrients decline during forest degradation process. Soil Ecol Lett. 2019;1:59–71.
Ideno Y, Hayashi K, Abe Y, Ueda K, Iso H, Noda M, et al. Blood pressure-lowering effect of Shinrin-yoku (Forest bathing): a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complement Alter Med. 2017;17:409.
Bowyer RCE, Jackson MA, Pallister T, Skinner J, Spector TD, Welch AA, et al. Use of dietary indices to control for diet in human gut microbiota studies. Microbiome. 2018;6:77.
Partula V, Mondot S, Torres MJ, Kesse-Guyot E, Deschasaux M, Assmann K, et al. Associations between usual diet and gut microbiota composition: results from the Milieu Intérieur cross-sectional study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109:1472–83.
Monda V, Villano I, Messina A, Valenzano A, Esposito T, Moscatelli F, et al. Exercise modifies the gut microbiota with positive health effects. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:3831972.
Smith RP, Easson C, Lyle SM, Kapoor R, Donnelly CP, Davidson EJ, et al. Gut microbiome diversity is associated with sleep physiology in humans. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0222394.
Mills JG, Weinstein P, Gellie NJC, Weyrich LS, Lowe AJ, Breed MF. Urban habitat restoration provides a human health benefit through microbiome rewilding: the microbiome rewilding hypothesis. Restor Ecol. 2017;25:866.
Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, Sargent M, et al. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science. 2005;308:1635–8.
De Filippo C, Cavalieri D, Di Paola M, Ramazzotti M, Poullet JB, Massart S, et al. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:14691–6.
Yang T, Santisteban MM, Rodriguez V, Li E, Ahmari N, Carvajal JM, et al. Gut dysbiosis is linked to hypertension. Hypertension. 2015;65:1331–40.
Santisteban MM, Qi Y, Zubcevic J, Kim S, Yang T, Shenoy V, et al. Hypertension-linked pathophysiological alterations in the gut. Circ Res. 2017;120:312–23.
Huart J, Leenders J, Taminiau B, Descy J, Saint-Remy A, Daube G, et al. Gut microbiota and fecal levels of short-chain fatty acids differ upon 24-hour blood pressure levels in men. Hypertension. 2019;74:1005–13.
O’Mahony SM, Clarke G, Borre YE, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Serotonin, tryptophan metabolism and the brain-gut-microbiome axis. Behav Brain Res. 2015;277:32–48.
Pluznick JL, Protzko RJ, Gevorgyan H, Peterlin Z, Sipos A, Han J, et al. Olfactory receptor responding to gut microbiota-derived signals plays a role in renin secretion and blood pressure regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:4410–5.
Yang T, Magee KL, Colon-Perez LM, Larkin R, Liao YS, Balazic E, et al. Impaired butyrate absorption in the proximal colon, low serum butyrate and diminished central effects of butyrate on blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Acta Physiol. 2019;226:e13256.
Kim S, Goel R, Kumar A, Qi Y, Lobaton G, Hosaka K, et al. Imbalance of gut microbiome and intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction in patients with high blood pressure. Clin Sci. 2018;132:701–71.
Khalesi S, Sun J, Buys N, Jayasinghe R. Effect of probiotics on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Hypertension. 2014;64:897–903.
Van Staden Adu P, Heunis T, Smith C, Deane S, Dicks LM. Efficacy of lantibiotic treatment of staphylococcus aureus-induced skin infections, monitored by in vivo bioluminescent imaging. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:3948–55.
Kingwell K. Bacteriophage therapies re-enter clinical trials. Nat Rev Drug Disco. 2015;14:515–6.
National Centers for Environmental Information. Global climate report. Washington, DC: National Centers for Environmental Information: 2018. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201804.
Ahima RS. Global warming threatens human thermoregulation and survival. J Clin Invest. 2020:135006. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI135006.
Haines A, Ebi K. The imperative for climate action to protect health. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:263–73.
Bond-Lamberty B, Bailey VL, Chen M, Gough CM, Vargas R. Globally rising soil heterotrophic respiration over recent decades. Nature. 2018;560:80–83.
Dietz WH. Climate change and malnutrition: we need to act now. J Clin Invest. 2020:135004. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI135004.
Tsao TM, Tsai MJ, Hwang JS, Su TC. Health effects of seasonal variation in cardiovascular hemodynamics among workers in forest environments. Hypertens Res. 2019;42:223–32.
Modesti PA, Rapi S, Rogolino A, Tosi B, Galanti G. Seasonal blood pressure variation: implications for cardiovascular risk stratification. Hypertens Res. 2018;41:475–82.
Japan Times. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/08/06/national/57-dead-18000-taken-hospitals-one-week-amid-japan-heat-wave/#.XjHmYHdFw2z (2019).
Protsiv M, Ley C, Lankester J, Hastie T, Parsonnet J. Decreasing human body temperature in the United States since the industrial revolution. Elife. 2020;9:e49555. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49555.
Hausfater P, Megarbane B, Dautheville S, Patzak A, Andronikof M, Santin A, et al. Prognostic factors in non-exertional heatstroke. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:272–80.
Sommet A, Durrieu G, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Montastruc JL. Association of French PharmacoVigilance Centres. A comparative study of adverse drug reactions during two heat waves that occurred in France in 2003 and 2006. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21:285–8.
Salas RN, Jha AK. Climate change threatens the achievement of effective universal healthcare. BMJ. 2019;366:l5302.
Mobula LM, Fisher ML, Lau N, Estelle A, Wood T, Plyler W. Prevalence of hypertension among patients attending mobile medical clinics in the Philippines after typhoon Haiyan. PLoS Curr. 2016;8:ecurrents.dis.5aaeb105e840c72370e8e688835882ce. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.5aaeb105e840c72370e8e688835882ce.
Acknowledgements
I gratefully acknowledge my great mentors in Japan and the US as well as the numerous study investigators, fellows, nurses, and research coordinators at each of the study sites. I also gratefully acknowledge my family and friends; their continued support is essential in my journey as a physician and researcher.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yano, Y. Blood pressure management in an ecosystem context. Hypertens Res 43, 989–994 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-020-0464-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-020-0464-7
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Digital hypertension towards to the anticipation medicine
Hypertension Research (2023)
-
Role of housing in blood pressure control: a review of evidence from the Smart Wellness Housing survey in Japan
Hypertension Research (2023)
-
Air pollution impairs endothelial function and blood pressure
Hypertension Research (2022)
-
Role of the microbiota in hypertension and antihypertensive drug metabolism
Hypertension Research (2022)
-
Catheter-based ultrasound renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension: the randomized, controlled REQUIRE trial
Hypertension Research (2022)



