Blood pressure targets in major international guidelines
Hypertension is a key modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide and continues to pose a critical public health challenge [1]. International hypertension guidelines have recently been revised and implemented in clinical practice [2,3,4,5]. Both the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH) [2] and the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) [3] published revised guidelines in 2025. A convergence across leading international societies, including the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [4], has led to a common recommendation of a treatment target of <130/80 mmHg for most adults with hypertension. This alignment is based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews demonstrating the cardiovascular benefits of more aggressive BP control [2,3,4,5]. The treatment target of <130/80 mmHg recommended by these major guidelines [2,3,4] is lower than that of the 2023 European Society of Hypertension (ESH) guidelines [5] (Table 1).
Within this global context, the JSH Guidelines for the Management of Elevated Blood Pressure and Hypertension 2025 (JSH2025) [2] introduce several advancements aimed at enhancing hypertension care in Japan. Particularly, BP target recommendations were formulated through a transparent and rigorous process based on Clinical Questions (CQs) derived from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This methodology, previously adopted in only two major guidelines (the 2017 AHA/ACC guidelines [6] and JSH 2019 [7]), ensures that recommendations are fully evidence-based and aligned with contemporary best practice.
The JSH2025 also highlights practical strategies for specific patient populations, including older adults, women, and cancer survivors. This report summarizes the revised BP targets and the key concepts incorporated into JSH2025.
Evidence-based framework for BP target recommendations
The JSH2025 employs two complementary formats: a CQ-based structure, where evidence directly informs recommendations, and a narrative descriptive format for clinical reference. Seven CQs specifically addressed BP treatment targets. Eligible studies were systematically identified and evaluated for methodological quality, and the data were synthesized into structured summaries. Both the anticipated benefits and potential harms were assessed when determining the strength and direction of each recommendation. A consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi approach with three rounds of online voting, and agreement levels were documented to ensure transparency. The draft recommendations underwent internal, external, and public consultations before the final approval. This robust process enhances the validity and credibility of the BP targets in JSH2025 and reflects growing international emphasis on transparency in guideline development and stakeholder engagement.
Simplified BP targets in JSH2025
Systematic reviews conducted for JSH2025 support an office BP target of <130/80 mmHg in most adults with hypertension [8]. The evidence includes high-risk subgroups, such as adults aged ≥75 years [9], those with a history of stroke [10], diabetes mellitus [11], heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [12], or chronic kidney disease [13]. Notably, no significant increase in serious adverse events was identified in these populations when the BP target was reduced to <130/80 mmHg. The findings were consistent across the subgroups, sustaining a universal treatment target regardless of age or multimorbidity [8,9,10,11,12,13].
Home BP monitoring is a key component of hypertension management. This approach is supported by recent systematic reviews demonstrating that home BP-based antihypertensive treatment is superior to office BP–based treatment in improving clinical outcomes, including ambulatory BP levels, in adult patients with essential hypertension [14]. Based on this evidence, JSH2025 proposes a home BP treatment target of <125/75 mmHg [1]. Strengthening routine home BP measurements is expected to enhance earlier detection, treatment adherence, and BP control rates.
An important conceptual shift in JSH2025 is the transition from age-based to condition-based recommendations. In managing blood pressure in older adults with hypertension, the guidelines emphasize functional status, frailty, cognitive function, and life expectancy. Adults aged ≥75 years who are functionally independent and tolerate therapy well are recommended to pursue a systolic blood pressure target of <130 mmHg. For those with frailty, dementia, or a high risk of falls, individualized treatment is essential to balance clinical benefits against potential harms [9].
For individuals with high-normal BP (130–139/80–89 mmHg) who are at low to moderate cardiovascular risk and lack diabetes or target organ damage, intensive lifestyle modification may serve as the initial management strategy, with decisions guided by the clinical context and cost-effectiveness [1].
In hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, evidence is insufficient to confirm whether pharmacological treatment targeting BP levels <130/80 mmHg improves maternal and fetal outcomes. As a result, JSH2025 refrains from providing specific recommendations regarding BP treatment targets for this population [15].
Safety considerations in intensive BP management
Although intensive systolic BP lowering, particularly to <120 mmHg, has demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in RCTs, it may increase the risk of adverse events, including symptomatic hypotension and acute kidney injury [7, 16, 17]. However, the absolute risks remain relatively low in controlled settings. Therefore, JSH2025 [2] recommends careful clinical monitoring to mitigate the risks associated with overtreatment, including orthostatic hypotension, renal function deterioration, and electrolyte abnormalities such as hyperkalemia. Similar cautionary guidelines are reflected in the 2025 AHA/ACC guidelines [3]. These recommendations underscore the necessity for individualized treatment planning, especially in older adults and patients with multimorbidity.
Implementation challenges and future directions
Hypertension remains the most prevalent modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide [1]. Reducing the number of individuals with uncontrolled BP is a critical global challenge. Despite universal healthcare coverage in Japan, approximately 4.5 million individuals remain untreated despite awareness of their hypertension status, and an estimated 12.5 million remain uncontrolled despite treatment [2]. This gap between clinical potential and real-world outcomes highlights the urgent need to improve the implementation of guidelines. The simplified BP targets in JSH2025 are expected to enhance primary care usability and support uniform applications in clinical practice.
The adoption of home BP monitoring is another significant opportunity to enhance BP control. The broader deployment of digital health tools, patient education programs, and team-based hypertension management can further optimize the outcomes [2,3,4,5]. Furthermore, the global harmonization of BP targets across major guidelines may promote more consistent clinical communication and patient engagement.
The ongoing evaluation of the impact of JSH2025 guidelines on treatment intensification, safety outcomes, and BP control rates is crucial. Continuous updating of evidence and adaptive implementation strategies will ensure that the guidelines remain responsive to changing demographics, emerging technologies, and evolving scientific knowledge.
JSH2025 guidelines mark an important milestone in the advancement of evidence-based management of elevated BP and hypertension. Through a rigorous systematic review methodology, simplified BP targets, and a condition-based approach to treatment recommendations, the guidelines are expected to improve clinical adoption and enhance BP control nationwide. Continued efforts to translate these recommendations into clinical practice hold promise for substantial cardiovascular benefits in Japan and will contribute to international progress in hypertension care.
References
NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Long-term and recent trends in hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in 12 high-income countries: an analysis of 123 nationally representative surveys. Lancet. 2019;394:639–51.
Japanese Society of Hypertension. JSH guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025). Hypertens Res. In press.
Jones DW, Ferdinand KC, Taler SJ, Johnson HM, Shimbo D, Abdalla M, et al. 2025 AHA/ACC/AANP/AAPA/ABC/ACCP/ACPM/AGS/AMA/ASPC/NMA/PCNA/SGIM guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation and management of high blood pressure in adults: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2025;152:e114–e218.
McEvoy JW, McCarthy CP, Bruno RM, Brouwers S, Canavan MD, Ceconi C, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:3912–4018.
Mancia G, Kreutz R, Brunström M, Burnier M, Grassi G, Januszewicz A, et al. 2023 ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension: Endorsed by the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the European Renal Association (ERA). J Hypertens. 2023;41:1874–2071.
Reboussin DM, Allen NB, Griswold ME, Guallar E, Hong Y, Lackland DT, et al. Systematic review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71:e116–e135.
Umemura S, Arima H, Arima S, Asayama K, Dohi Y, Hirooka Y, et al. The Japanese Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension (JSH 2019). Hypertens Res. 2019;42:1235–481.
Haze T, Katsurada K, Sakata S, Kuwabara M, Nishida N, Azegami T, et al. Effect of intensive versus standard blood pressure control on cardiovascular outcomes in adult patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens Res. 2025;48:1846–58.
Nozato Y, Nohara-Shitama Y, Kubozono T, Akasaka H, Takami Y, Arima H, et al. Targeting a systolic blood pressure of <130 mmHg is beneficial in adults with hypertension aged ≥75 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens Res. 2025;48:2527–36.
Maeda T, Ohya Y, Ishida S, Inoue Y, Fujii T, Sakamoto Y, et al. Optimal blood pressure target for patients with prior stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens Res. 2025;48:1859–69.
Abe M, Segawa H, Kinguchi S, Satoh A, Zamami R, Nishikido T, et al. Intensive blood pressure-lowering treatment to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens Res. 2025;48:2024–33.
Matsumoto C, Nagai M, Shinohara K, Morikawa N, Kai H, Arima H. Systolic blood pressure lower than 130 mmHg in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. Hypertens Res. 2025;48:2138–51.
Tada K, Fujiwara A, Sugano N, Hayashi K, Sakima A, Takami Y, et al. Evaluating blood pressure targets in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens Res. 2025;48:2358–67.
Maruhashi T, Tatsumi Y, Satoh M, Kobayashi Y, Ogoyama Y, Sakima A, et al. Updated meta-analysis for antihypertensive treatment guided by home blood pressure compared to treatment based on office blood pressure: systematic review. Hypertens Res. 2025;48:1839–45.
Abe M, Shinohara Y, Arata N, Metoki H, Fukami A, Arima H, et al. Blood pressure-lowering treatment for pregnant women with non-severe hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens Res. 2025;48:2152–62.
Whelton PK, O’Connell S, Mills KT, He J. Optimal antihypertensive systolic blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2024;81:2329–39.
Guo X, Sun G, Xu Y, Zhou S, Song Q, Li Y, et al. Benefit-harm trade-offs of intensive blood pressure control versus standard blood pressure control on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: an individual participant data analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2025;406:1009–19.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the use of OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Editage (www.editage.jp) for the English language editing and proofreading of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sakima, A., Hirawa, N. & Ohya, Y. Advancing evidence-based blood pressure targets in JSH2025. Hypertens Res (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-025-02518-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-025-02518-z