Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A systematic evaluation of youtube as an information source for male infertility

Abstract

This study evaluates YouTube videos (YTVs) focused on male infertility to assess information quality and identify high-quality content that can reliably facilitate care. Top 50 YTVs based on relevance were identified using the keyword “male infertility.” A checklist, adapted from American Urological Association guidelines addressing male infertility, was developed to assess YTV content. Two investigators extracted YTV features (including duration, likes, views, upload date), classified creators and ranked YTVs based on checklist scores. YTVs were then assigned grades A–D based on checklist scores. Kruskal–Wallis test and ANOVA were employed to draw associations between grades, content creator, and YTV features. Higher grades were associated with shorter video duration (p = 0.0305). Most YTVs (23/42) were created by healthcare-related organizations. Of the 42 YTVs included in the final analysis, 31% (13/42) explicitly defined infertility as an inability to conceive after 12 months of unprotected intercourse. Ninety percent (38/42) discussed male infertility evaluation methods, while 71% (30/42) discussed various interventions. Various content creators have adopted YouTube to discuss male infertility, and healthcare practitioners should be aware of YouTube’s potential influence on patient understanding of male infertility. Knowledge gaps identified in YTVs can help improve patient counseling and enable practitioners to direct patients to reliable content.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Checklist used to assess YTVs.
Fig. 2: YTVs by content creator.
Fig. 3: Content found in YTVs.
Fig. 4: Content found in YTVs by creator.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.

  2. Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, Chyatte MR. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1.

  3. Oliva A, Spira A, Multigner L. Contribution of environmental factors to the risk of male infertility. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1768–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Elbardisi H, Majzoub A, Al Said S, Al Rumaihi K, El Ansari W, Alattar A, et al. Geographical differences in semen characteristics of 13 892 infertile men. Arab J Urol. 2018;16:3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nassan FL, Chavarro JE, Tanrikut C. Diet and men’s fertility: does diet affect sperm quality? Fertil Steril 2018;110:570–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pan MM, Hockenberry MS, Kirby EW, Lipshultz LI. Male infertility diagnosis and treatment in the era of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Med Clin N Am. 2018;102:337–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelly-Hedrick M, Grunberg PH, Brochu F, Zelkowitz P. “It’s Totally Okay to Be Sad, but Never Lose Hope”: content analysis of infertility-related videos on YouTube in relation to viewer preferences. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e10199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lorenc A, Robinson N. A tool to improve patient and public engagement in commissioning sexual and reproductive health and HIV services. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015;41:8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabarron E, Wynn R. Use of social media for sexual health promotion: a scoping review. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:32193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Press Y. YouTube in numbers [Webpage]. 2019. https://www.youtube.com/intl/en-GB/yt/about/press/.

  12. Balasubramanian A, Yu J, Thirumavalavan N, Lipshultz LI, Hotaling JM, Pastuszak AW. Analyzing online twitter discussion for male infertility via the hashtag #MaleInfertility. Urol Pract. 2020;7:68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jarow J, Sigman M, Kolettis PN, Lipshultz LR, McClure RD, Nangia AK, et al. Optimal evaluation of the infertile male. American Urological Association; 2019. https://www.auanet.org/guidelines/male-infertility-optimal-evaluation-best-practice-statement.

  14. Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85:257–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37:360–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Katz DJ, Teloken P, Shoshany O. Male infertility - The other side of the equation. Aust Fam Physician. 2017;46:641–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sonmez MG, Haliloglu AH. Role of varicocele treatment in assisted reproductive technologies. Arab J Urol. 2018;16:188–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

AWP is a National Institutes of Health K08 Scholar supported by a Mentored Career Development Award (K08DK115835-01) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. This work is also supported in part through a Urology Care Foundation Rising Stars in Urology Award (to AWP).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seul Ku.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ku, S., Balasubramanian, A., Yu, J. et al. A systematic evaluation of youtube as an information source for male infertility. Int J Impot Res 33, 611–615 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0322-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0322-9

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links