Abstract
This study evaluates YouTube videos (YTVs) focused on male infertility to assess information quality and identify high-quality content that can reliably facilitate care. Top 50 YTVs based on relevance were identified using the keyword “male infertility.” A checklist, adapted from American Urological Association guidelines addressing male infertility, was developed to assess YTV content. Two investigators extracted YTV features (including duration, likes, views, upload date), classified creators and ranked YTVs based on checklist scores. YTVs were then assigned grades A–D based on checklist scores. Kruskal–Wallis test and ANOVA were employed to draw associations between grades, content creator, and YTV features. Higher grades were associated with shorter video duration (p = 0.0305). Most YTVs (23/42) were created by healthcare-related organizations. Of the 42 YTVs included in the final analysis, 31% (13/42) explicitly defined infertility as an inability to conceive after 12 months of unprotected intercourse. Ninety percent (38/42) discussed male infertility evaluation methods, while 71% (30/42) discussed various interventions. Various content creators have adopted YouTube to discuss male infertility, and healthcare practitioners should be aware of YouTube’s potential influence on patient understanding of male infertility. Knowledge gaps identified in YTVs can help improve patient counseling and enable practitioners to direct patients to reliable content.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout




Similar content being viewed by others
References
WHO. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, Chyatte MR. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1.
Oliva A, Spira A, Multigner L. Contribution of environmental factors to the risk of male infertility. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1768–76.
Elbardisi H, Majzoub A, Al Said S, Al Rumaihi K, El Ansari W, Alattar A, et al. Geographical differences in semen characteristics of 13 892 infertile men. Arab J Urol. 2018;16:3–9.
Nassan FL, Chavarro JE, Tanrikut C. Diet and men’s fertility: does diet affect sperm quality? Fertil Steril 2018;110:570–7.
Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–8.
Pan MM, Hockenberry MS, Kirby EW, Lipshultz LI. Male infertility diagnosis and treatment in the era of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Med Clin N Am. 2018;102:337–47.
Kelly-Hedrick M, Grunberg PH, Brochu F, Zelkowitz P. “It’s Totally Okay to Be Sad, but Never Lose Hope”: content analysis of infertility-related videos on YouTube in relation to viewer preferences. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e10199.
Lorenc A, Robinson N. A tool to improve patient and public engagement in commissioning sexual and reproductive health and HIV services. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015;41:8–12.
Gabarron E, Wynn R. Use of social media for sexual health promotion: a scoping review. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:32193.
Press Y. YouTube in numbers [Webpage]. 2019. https://www.youtube.com/intl/en-GB/yt/about/press/.
Balasubramanian A, Yu J, Thirumavalavan N, Lipshultz LI, Hotaling JM, Pastuszak AW. Analyzing online twitter discussion for male infertility via the hashtag #MaleInfertility. Urol Pract. 2020;7:68–74.
Jarow J, Sigman M, Kolettis PN, Lipshultz LR, McClure RD, Nangia AK, et al. Optimal evaluation of the infertile male. American Urological Association; 2019. https://www.auanet.org/guidelines/male-infertility-optimal-evaluation-best-practice-statement.
Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85:257–68.
Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37:360–3.
Katz DJ, Teloken P, Shoshany O. Male infertility - The other side of the equation. Aust Fam Physician. 2017;46:641–6.
Sonmez MG, Haliloglu AH. Role of varicocele treatment in assisted reproductive technologies. Arab J Urol. 2018;16:188–96.
Acknowledgements
AWP is a National Institutes of Health K08 Scholar supported by a Mentored Career Development Award (K08DK115835-01) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. This work is also supported in part through a Urology Care Foundation Rising Stars in Urology Award (to AWP).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ku, S., Balasubramanian, A., Yu, J. et al. A systematic evaluation of youtube as an information source for male infertility. Int J Impot Res 33, 611–615 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0322-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0322-9
This article is cited by
-
Social Media and Men’s Health: Separating Science from Speculation in Andrology
Basic and Clinical Andrology (2025)
-
YouTube™ as a source of information on prostatitis: a quality and reliability analysis
International Journal of Impotence Research (2024)
-
Analysis of quality information provided by “Dr. YouTubeTM” on Phimosis
International Journal of Impotence Research (2023)
-
YouTube is inadequate as an information source on delayed ejaculation
International Journal of Impotence Research (2023)
-
Correlation between Twitter mentions and academic citations in sexual medicine journals
International Journal of Impotence Research (2022)

