Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Is it safe to implant a penile prosthesis in a solid organ transplant recipient? A systematic review

Abstract

Solid organ transplant recipients exhibit an elevated incidence of erectile dysfunction, attributed to comorbidities and specific factors associated with organ failure. While treatment mirrors the general population’s, response rates are lower, and there is a heightened concern about implanting a penile prosthesis in immunocompromised patients due to the potential occurrence of severe complications. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of penile prostheses in this population. Among fourteen included studies, ten were case reports or series of cases, and four were non randomized case-control studies with non-transplanted patients as controls. Complications affected 34 patients (11.15%), with mechanical device failures in 18 cases (5.9%) and infections in 13 cases (4.26%). Most infections required hospitalization, antibiotic treatment, and prosthesis removal, with two cases of life-threatening Fournier’s gangrene. Case-control studies revealed no differences in overall reoperation rates between transplant recipients and controls. However, pelvic organ transplant recipients undergoing three-piece prosthesis implantation showed higher complications rates related to reservoir issues. Despite limited evidence, case-control studies demonstrated a generally low/moderate risk of bias within each specific domain, although overall bias was moderate/severe. As a result, clinicians may mitigate concerns regarding penile prosthesis implantation in solid organ transplant recipients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Flowchart: Literature Search and Systematic Review Process.
Fig. 2: Risk of Bias and Applicability Judgments Overview Using ROBINS-I.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kugler C, Gottlieb J, Warnecke G, Schwarz A, Weissenborn K, Barg-Hock H, et al. Health-related quality of life after solid organ transplantation: a prospective, multiorgan cohort study. Transplantation. 2013;96:316–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thirumavalavan N, Wilken N, Ramasamy R. Hypogonadism and renal failure: an update. Indian J Urol. 2015;31:89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Thirumavalavan N, Scovell JM, Link RE, Lamb DJ, Lipshultz LI. Does solid organ transplantation affect male reproduction? Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4:307–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Payne K, Popat S, Lipshultz LI, Thirumavalavan N. The prevalence and treatment of erectile dysfunction in male solid organ transplant recipients. Sex Med Rev. 2021;9:331–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosen RC, Fisher WA, Eardley I, Niederberger C, Nadel A, Sand M. The multinational Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) study: I. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction and related health concerns in the general population. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20:607–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma RK, Prasad N, Gupta A, Kapoor R. Treatment of erectile dysfunction with sildenafil citrate in renal allograft recipients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48:128–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Demir E, Balal M, Paydas S, Sertdemir Y, Erken U. Efficacy and safety of vardenafil in renal transplant recipients with erectile dysfunction. Transplant Proc. 2006;38:1379–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lasaponara F, Paradiso M, Milan MGL, Morabito F, Sedigh O, Graziano ME, et al. Erectile dysfunction after kidney transplantation: our 22 years of experience. Transplant Proc. 2004;36:502–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Livi U, Faggian G, Sorbara C, Gambino A, Calabrò A, Artibani W, et al. Use of prostaglandin E1 in the treatment of sexual impotence after heart transplantation: initial clinical experience. J Heart Lung Transplant Off Publ Int Soc Heart Transplant. 1993;12:484–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mansi MK, Alkhudair WK, Huraib S. Treatment of erectile dysfunction after kidney transplantation with intracavernosal self-injection of prostaglandin E1. J Urol. 1998;159:1927–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Carvalho J, Cilesiz NC, et al. EAU working group on male sexual and reproductive health. european association of urology guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health-2021 update: male sexual dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2021;8:333–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Erikoglu M, Tavli S, Turk S. Fournier’s gangrene after renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:449–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walther PJ, Andriani RT, Maggio MI, Carson CC. Fournier’s gangrene: a complication of penile prosthetic implantation in a renal transplant patient. J Urol. 1987;137:299–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun AY, Babbar P, Gill BC, Angermeier KW, Montague DK. Penile prosthesis in solid organ transplant recipients—a matched cohort study. Urology. 2018;117:86–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Knoll T, Omar MI, Maclennan S, Hernández V, Canfield S, Yuan Y, et al. Key steps in conducting systematic reviews for underpinning clinical practice guidelines: methodology of the European Association of Urology. Eur Urol. 2018;73:290–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

  17. Greenberg JW, Dick BP, Hellstrom WJG, Paramesh A, Raheem O. Safety of penile prosthesis surgery in solid organ transplant patients. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:507–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gaffney CD, Fainberg J, Punjani N, Aboukhshaba A, Pierce H, Patel N, et al. Immune deficiency does not increase inflatable penile prosthesis reoperation rates. J Sex Med. 2021;18:1427–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cuellar DC, Sklar GN. Penile prosthesis in the organ transplant recipient. Urology. 2001;57:138–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.

  21. Sausville J, Gupta G, Forrest G, Chai T. Salmonella infection of a penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2009;6:1487–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pavone C, Abbadessa D, Leto G, Giaimo RM, Ascoli R, Usala M, et al. Penile flexiflate ® Surgitek prosthesis explant and simultaneous three-component hydraulic titan ® Alpha 1 prosthesis implantation, with double incision technique in a patient with kidney and pancreas transplant. Urol J. 2011;78:22–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kabalin JN, Kessler R. Successful implantation of penile prostheses in organ transplant patients. Urology. 1989;33:282–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sidi AA, Peng W, Sanseau C, Lange PH. Penile prosthesis surgery in the treatment of impotence in the immunosuppressed man. J Urol. 1987;137:681–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pearson TC, Futral AA, Routenberg KL, Oʼbrien DP, Whelchel JD, Neylan JF, et al. Delayed urinary bladder leak after combined kidney-pancreas transplantation association with penile prosthesis implantation. Transplantation. 1995;60:624.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rowe SJ, Montague DK, Steinmuller DR, Lakin MM, Novick AC. Treatment of organic impotence with penile prosthesis in renal transplant patients. Urology. 1993;41:16–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Govier FE, Gibbons RP, Correa RJ, Pritchett TR, Kramer-Levien D. Mechanical reliability, surgical complications, and patient and partner satisfaction of the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology. 1998;52:282–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Timsit JF, Sonneville R, Kalil AC, Bassetti M, Ferrer R, Jaber S, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to infectious diseases in solid organ transplant recipients. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:573–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Natali A, Olianas R, Fisch M. Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany. J Sex Med. 2008;5:1503–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gon LM, De Campos CCC, Voris BRI, Passeri LA, Fregonesi A, Riccetto CLZ. A systematic review of penile prosthesis infection and meta-analysis of diabetes mellitus role. BMC Urol. 2021;21:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mandava SH, Serefoglu EC, Freier MT, Wilson SK, Hellstrom WJG. Infection retardant coated inflatable penile prostheses decrease the incidence of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2012;188:1855–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson SK, Gross MS. Biofilm and penile prosthesis infections in the era of coated implants: 2021 update. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:411–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hebert KJ, Kohler TS. Penile prosthesis infection: myths and realities. World J Mens Health. 2019;37:276.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Onyeji IC, Sui W, Pagano MJ, Weinberg AC, James MB, Theofanides MC, et al. Impact of surgeon case volume on reoperation rates after inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. J Urol. 2017;197:223–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Topuz B, Ebiloğlu T, Zor M, Kaya E, Sarıkaya S, Emrah Coğuplugil A, et al. Penile prosthesis implantation: a single center 25 years of experience. Prog En Urol. 2021;31:663–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Palmisano F, Boeri L, Cristini C, Antonini G, Spinelli MG, Franco G, et al. Comparison of infra pubic vs. penoscrotal approaches for 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis placement: do we have a winner? Sex Med Rev. 2018;6:631–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Conception and design: AT, Acquisition of data: ALA, MB, Analysis and interpretation of data: AT, ALA, MB, Drafting of the manuscript: AT, ALA, MB. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: AC, ERC, FC, GM, TP, APi, APe, BBM, MID, FE, GIR, RC, AB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelo Territo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The authors certify that this document complies with the current ethical standards and that no individual data have been used.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Territo, A., Belmonte, M., Cocci, A. et al. Is it safe to implant a penile prosthesis in a solid organ transplant recipient? A systematic review. Int J Impot Res 37, 18–26 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00939-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00939-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links