Abstract
The global demand for inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery continues to rise, yet little guidance exists on how mature, ultra-high-volume centers sustain efficiency, safety, and workflow at scale. Drawing on the experience of a single-surgeon center that performed more than 1500 primary inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantations, this perspective outlines the operational philosophy and practical architecture that enabled such volume. The model relies on extreme task specialization within a 13-member team, a streamlined triage and consultation pathway, strict pre-operative standardization, and tightly choreographed surgical logistics using two dedicated operating rooms. Long-standing collaboration among team members enables procedure times of approximately 40 min and supports a daily schedule of 7–15 cases. Prospective patient tracking and consistent postoperative protocols contribute to exceptionally low infection and mechanical revision rates. By describing the elements that enable this level of surgical throughput, rather than presenting these practices as a rigid template, this Perspective aims to stimulate discussion on how high-volume principles can be adapted to diverse clinical environments and how procedural specialization may shape the future of prosthetic urology.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analyzed for this descriptive Perspective report.
References
Ji YS, Ko YH, Song PH, Moon KH. Long-term survival and patient satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Korean J Urol. 2015;56:461–5.
Owusu R, Diego S, Seybold K, Qi D, Liu G, Hsieh T-C. MP25-11 The rise of outpatient penile prosthesis surgery: a cross-sectional analysis of national trends. J Urol. 2017;197:e314.
Andino JJ, Leelani N, Sato R, Shin Y, Rojanasarot S, Furtado T, et al. Association between surgeon procedure volume and reoperation rates for penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2025;22:916–23.
Onyeji IC, Sui W, Pagano MJ, Weinberg AC, James MB, Theofanides MC, et al. Impact of surgeon case volume on reoperation rates after inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. J Urol. 2017;197:223–9.
Nguyen V, Sato R, Loh-Doyle J, Brant W, Rojanasarot S, Telang S, et al. A nationwide analysis of postpenile prosthesis infection: do hospital and surgeon volume matter? Urology. 2025;201:159–66.
Lau M, Hamdan M, Kilany M. Effect of combined low dose spinal anesthesia and caudal block on postoperative pain outcomes of penile prosthesis surgery. J Sex Med. 2020;17:S140–1.
Eid JF, Wilson SK, Cleves M, Salem EA. Coated implants and ‘no touch’ surgical technique decreases risk of infection in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to 0.46%. Urology. 2012;79:1310–6.
Cohen SD, Eid JF. Hemostatic matrix during corporotomy closure. J Sex Med. 2014;11:869–72.
Shumaker L, Zulia N, Kennedy E, Beilan J, Ortiz N, Baumgarten A. Delayed closed-suction drain removal following inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a multi-institutional experience. J Sex Med. 2023;20:1440–5.
Osmonov D, Ragheb AM, Petry T, Eraky A, Bettocchi C, Lamers KG, et al. Value of prolonged scrotal drainage after penile prosthesis implantation: a multicenter prospective nonrandomized pilot study. Int J Impot Res. 2023;37:87–91.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MH Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Resources, Critical Revision. MGD Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing, Project Administration. AS Data Curation (operational metrics), Visualization (workflow structuring), Writing – Review & Editing. All authors approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
This report does not involve human participant data; therefore, ethical approval was not required.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hamdan, M., Deameh, M.G. & Sadeq, A. Meeting the growing demand: an operational blueprint for a 1500-case-per-year penile implant center of excellence. Int J Impot Res (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-026-01260-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-026-01260-5


