Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Meeting the growing demand: an operational blueprint for a 1500-case-per-year penile implant center of excellence

Abstract

The global demand for inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery continues to rise, yet little guidance exists on how mature, ultra-high-volume centers sustain efficiency, safety, and workflow at scale. Drawing on the experience of a single-surgeon center that performed more than 1500 primary inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantations, this perspective outlines the operational philosophy and practical architecture that enabled such volume. The model relies on extreme task specialization within a 13-member team, a streamlined triage and consultation pathway, strict pre-operative standardization, and tightly choreographed surgical logistics using two dedicated operating rooms. Long-standing collaboration among team members enables procedure times of approximately 40 min and supports a daily schedule of 7–15 cases. Prospective patient tracking and consistent postoperative protocols contribute to exceptionally low infection and mechanical revision rates. By describing the elements that enable this level of surgical throughput, rather than presenting these practices as a rigid template, this Perspective aims to stimulate discussion on how high-volume principles can be adapted to diverse clinical environments and how procedural specialization may shape the future of prosthetic urology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Workflow summarizing staffing structure, patient triage, standardized pre-operative preparation, surgical logistics, and post-operative management in a high-volume penile implant center.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed for this descriptive Perspective report.

References

  1. Ji YS, Ko YH, Song PH, Moon KH. Long-term survival and patient satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Korean J Urol. 2015;56:461–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Owusu R, Diego S, Seybold K, Qi D, Liu G, Hsieh T-C. MP25-11 The rise of outpatient penile prosthesis surgery: a cross-sectional analysis of national trends. J Urol. 2017;197:e314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andino JJ, Leelani N, Sato R, Shin Y, Rojanasarot S, Furtado T, et al. Association between surgeon procedure volume and reoperation rates for penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2025;22:916–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Onyeji IC, Sui W, Pagano MJ, Weinberg AC, James MB, Theofanides MC, et al. Impact of surgeon case volume on reoperation rates after inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. J Urol. 2017;197:223–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen V, Sato R, Loh-Doyle J, Brant W, Rojanasarot S, Telang S, et al. A nationwide analysis of postpenile prosthesis infection: do hospital and surgeon volume matter? Urology. 2025;201:159–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lau M, Hamdan M, Kilany M. Effect of combined low dose spinal anesthesia and caudal block on postoperative pain outcomes of penile prosthesis surgery. J Sex Med. 2020;17:S140–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eid JF, Wilson SK, Cleves M, Salem EA. Coated implants and ‘no touch’ surgical technique decreases risk of infection in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to 0.46%. Urology. 2012;79:1310–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen SD, Eid JF. Hemostatic matrix during corporotomy closure. J Sex Med. 2014;11:869–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shumaker L, Zulia N, Kennedy E, Beilan J, Ortiz N, Baumgarten A. Delayed closed-suction drain removal following inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a multi-institutional experience. J Sex Med. 2023;20:1440–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Osmonov D, Ragheb AM, Petry T, Eraky A, Bettocchi C, Lamers KG, et al. Value of prolonged scrotal drainage after penile prosthesis implantation: a multicenter prospective nonrandomized pilot study. Int J Impot Res. 2023;37:87–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MH Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Resources, Critical Revision. MGD Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing, Project Administration. AS Data Curation (operational metrics), Visualization (workflow structuring), Writing – Review & Editing. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Ghassab Deameh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This report does not involve human participant data; therefore, ethical approval was not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamdan, M., Deameh, M.G. & Sadeq, A. Meeting the growing demand: an operational blueprint for a 1500-case-per-year penile implant center of excellence. Int J Impot Res (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-026-01260-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-026-01260-5

Search

Quick links