Table 1 Parameter estimates from dose-response model fitting to experimental data

From: Variation in Wolbachia effects on Aedes mosquitoes as a determinant of invasiveness and vectorial capacity

Parameter

p

\({\mathbf{\alpha}} _{{\bf Wolb}^{\bf +}}\)

\({\mathbf{\theta}} _{{\bf Wolb}^{\bf +}}\)

Brazil

MAP

1.149 × 10−7

0.3332

20.77

Median

1.066 × 10−7

0.3465

26.54

95% CI

5.720 × 10−8

0.1547

2.566

1.837 × 10−7

0.8907

447.0

Parameter

\({\mathbf{\alpha}} _{{\bf Wolb}^{\bf -}}\)

\({\mathbf{\theta}} _{{\bf Wolb}^{\bf -}}\)

\({\mathbf{\alpha}} _{{\bf Wolb}^{\bf +}}\)

\({\mathbf{\theta}} _{{\bf Wolb}^{\bf +}}\)

Vietnam

MAP

0.3602

347.1

0.2047

910.3

Median

0.3652

401.9

0.2064

944.5

95% CI

0.3045

235.4

0.1677

437.7

0.4366

761.4

0.2522

2363

  1. MAP denotes maximum a posteriori probability. In Brazil, p is the probability of infection for a Wolb mosquito per unit of viral challenge (TCID50), and \({\rm \alpha}_{{\rm Wolb}^+}\), \(\theta_{{\rm Wolb}^+}\) are the shape and scale parameters, respectively, of the gamma distribution determining the susceptibility factors of Wolb+ mosquitoes in relation to Wolb (i.e., with respect to p). In Vietnam paux = 10−8 (per log10 viral titre (RNA copies/ml)), was used as an auxiliary parameter, while \({\rm \alpha}_{{\rm Wolb}^–}\), \(\theta _{{\rm Wolb^-}}\) and \({\rm \alpha}_{{\rm Wolb}^+}\), \(\theta _{{\rm Wolb^+}}\) define the distributions of susceptibility of Wolb and Wolb+ mosquitoes, respectively, in relation to paux