Fig. 6 | Nature Communications

Fig. 6

From: Spin current generation and relaxation in a quenched spin-orbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensate

Fig. 6

GPE simulated SDM at various ΩF and the extracted SDM damping compared with experiment. a, b GPE simulations of the 1D momentum-space density distributions of the two bare spin components as a function of thold for the SDM at ΩF = 0 and ΩF = 1.3 Er, respectively. The 1D momentum density ρσ(ky) is obtained by integrating the 3D momentum density along kx and kz, i.e., \(\rho _\sigma \left( {k_y} \right) = {\int} {\kern 1pt} \rho _\sigma \left( {k_x,k_y,k_z} \right)dk_xdk_z\). Then, these integrated 1D atomic momentum densities for sequential hold times (thold) are combined to show the atomic density in momentum space along the SOC direction versus thold. c GPE simulations of the SDM damping versus thold at various ΩF. The violet lines are the ħkspin (defined as the difference between the CoM momenta of the two spin components) as a function of thold for various ΩF. The CoM momentum (ħk↑,↓) of each bare spin component (at a given thold) is calculated by taking a density-weighted average of the corresponding 1D momentum density distributions such as those shown in a, b. The black lines are damped sinusoidal fits for the calculated ħkspin to extract the corresponding SDM damping (1/Q) which is shown in d along with the experimental data reproduced from Fig. 3f. e Replotting of d with 1/Q shown in logarithmic scale. fj In situ (real space) atomic densities calculated from GPE simulations. f Initial in situ 2D density at Ω = ΩI (right before applying spin-dependent electric fields Eσ). gj In situ 2D density at thold = 1.5 ms (after the application of Eσ) for ΩF = 0, 0.4 Er, 0.9 Er, and 1.3 Er, respectively. For fj, the density is designated by brightness and the bare spin polarization by colors (red: ↓, blue: ↑, white: equal spin populations). The 2D densities ρσ(x, y) in fj are obtained by integrating the 3D atomic density along z, i.e., \(\rho _\sigma (x,y) = {\int} {\kern 1pt} \rho _\sigma (x,y,z)dz\). In this figure, the simulations used the following parameters representative of our experiment: ΩI = 5.2 Er, δR = 0, Nc = 1.6 × 104, ωz = 2π × 37 Hz, ωx = ωy = 2π × 205 Hz, tE = 1.0 ms

Back to article page