Table 3 Mixed-effects linear model on the time (days) used by the referees to complete the review
From: The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Fixed effects | Estimate | Std. error | DF | t-value | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Intercept) | 32.523 | 5.754 | 4.212 | 5.652 | 0.004 |
Open review | 1.184 | 1.264 | 17,908.048 | 0.937 | 0.349 |
Status: Other | −1.141 | 0.906 | 17,785.534 | −1.259 | 0.208 |
Status: Dr | −1.367 | 0.475 | 17,885.086 | −2.880 | 0.004 |
Gender: Male | −1.770 | 0.846 | 17,703.590 | −2.091 | 0.037 |
Gender: Uncertain | −2.126 | 0.923 | 17,689.373 | −2.302 | 0.021 |
Year | −1.152 | 0.135 | 8588.867 | −8.513 | <0.001 |
Open review × Status: Other | 1.139 | 1.276 | 17,957.877 | 0.893 | 0.372 |
Open review × Status: Dr | 1.461 | 0.685 | 18,028.466 | 2.132 | 0.033 |
Open review × Gender: Male | −0.481 | 1.104 | 17,807.117 | −0.436 | 0.663 |
Open review × Gender: Uncertain | −0.310 | 1.219 | 17,804.771 | −0.254 | 0.799 |
Std. Dev. of random effects: | |||||
Submission (intercept) | 8.241 | ||||
Journal (intercept) | 12.690 | ||||
Residual | 18.984 | ||||
No. of observations | 18,100.0 | ||||
Log likelihood | −80,388.5 | ||||
AIC | 160,777.0 | ||||