Table 2 Key social processes

From: Social-ecological alignment and ecological conditions in coral reefs

Attributes

Measurement

Site

  

A

B

C

D

E

Trust

Trust in fishers, reported on a scale of 1–5 (none, more distrust than trust, half/half, trust more than distrust, trust all); mean/SD—FS

3.93 (0.96)

3.95 (0.98)

3.84 (0.95)

4.09 (1.11)*

3.63 (1.19)*

Common understanding/shared vision

Perception of resource state, where respondent reported there were less (−1), the same (0), or more (1) fish on reef than 5 years prior; mean/SD—FS

−0.82 (0.55)

−0.92 (0.35)

−0.84 (0.53)

−0.67 (0.72)*

−0.87 (0.44)

Commitments (rules)

      

 Closed area

Yes/no—CL

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

 Access rights

Yes/no—CL

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

 Gear restrictions

Yes/no—CL

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Conflict resolution mechanisms

Yes/no—CL

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

 Internal conflicts

Reports of conflict within the community over gear use; yes/no—ref. 53

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

  1. Indicators of key social processes theorized to be supported by social–ecological network closure across the five coral reef fishing communities studied (sites A–E). Notable differences are reported in bold. Asterisk (*) indicates a significantly different variance (p < 0.05) than those reported without an asterisk footnote according to Levene’s robust test statistic for the equality of variances between groups.
  2. FS fisher survey, CL community leader interview