Fig. 5
Electrochemical performance comparison of the cells using PEO-DLSL and planar Li-foil anode, respectively. a Voltage profiles of symmetric cells using different anodes at different current densities. b, c Detailed voltage profiles at the current density of 0.1 and 0.5 mA cm−2, respectively. d Comparison of the long-term cycling stability of the symmetric cells with PEO-DLSL and Li-foil anodes at a current density of 0.5 mA cm−2. e Rate capability comparison of Li-LFP full batteries with PEO-DLSL and Li-foil anode. f GDC curves of PEO-DLSL/LFP and Li-foil/LFP full cells at 2 C current density. g Long-term cycling performance of batteries at a current density of 0.5 C. All cells were operated at 60 °C
